모든 템플릿

Color Vision & Contrast Digital Accessibility Assessment

Evaluates how users with color vision differences experience color and contrast in digital interfaces, measuring pain points, satisfaction, design preferences, and customization needs to inform accessible UI/UX design.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey explores your experience with color and contrast in digital interfaces. Your participation is voluntary — you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we want your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to inform more accessible design. Estimated completion time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
객관식

Do you have a diagnosed or suspected color vision difference?

  • Yes, clinically diagnosed
  • I suspect I have one
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how often did color choices in websites or apps make it harder for you to complete tasks?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q04
의견 척도

How important is strong color contrast for your everyday use of digital interfaces?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all important최대:Extremely important
Q05
의견 척도

How readable do you find light text on a dark background (e.g., white text on dark blue)?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult to read최대:Very easy to read
Q06
장문형

Please describe a recent experience with a website or app where color or contrast either helped or hindered your ability to complete a task.

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for participating! Your responses are valuable and will help make digital interfaces more accessible for everyone.

Q09
드롭다운

Which type best describes your color vision difference?

  • Deuteranomaly/deuteranopia (red–green)
  • Protanomaly/protanopia (red–green)
  • Tritanomaly/tritanopia (blue–yellow)
  • Monochromacy (achromatopsia)
  • Not sure
Q10
객관식

In the past 30 days, which of the following were difficult when color was the only cue? Select all that apply.

  • Seeing active vs. inactive states
  • Reading status badges (e.g., success, error)
  • Understanding form validation states
  • Reading charts or heatmaps
  • Interpreting maps or legends
  • Telling links from regular text
  • Distinguishing buttons from text
  • Other (please specify)
Q11
순위 매기기

Rank the following alternatives to color-only cues from most to least helpful for you.

  1. Text labels
  2. Icons or symbols
  3. Patterns or textures
  4. Underlines or borders
  5. Different shapes
  6. Haptic or audio feedback
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q12
의견 척도

How readable do you find dark text on a light background (e.g., black text on white)?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult to read최대:Very easy to read
Q13
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn more about your color accessibility experiences. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q14
객관식

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

Which types of digital devices do you use most frequently? Select all that apply.

  • Smartphone
  • Tablet
  • Laptop
  • Desktop monitor
  • Smart TV or large display
  • Other
Q16
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with the color accessibility of the apps and websites you regularly use?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q17
객관식

If the following customization options were available, which would you be likely to use? Select all that apply.

  • High-contrast theme
  • Color-blind-friendly palettes
  • Increased color differences for states
  • Icons on status messages
  • Underline all links
  • Patterns added to charts
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
의견 척도

How readable do you find low-contrast text (e.g., gray text on a light gray background)?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult to read최대:Very easy to read
Q19
장문형

Based on your responses throughout this survey, is there anything else you would like designers to know about your color and contrast needs?

Q20
드롭다운

In which region do you primarily live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend the apps or websites you currently use to someone with a similar color vision profile?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q22
의견 척도

How readable do you find colored text on a colored background (e.g., red text on green)?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult to read최대:Very easy to read

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated screening flow (diagnosed/suspected color vision difference, specific type) before any experience questions, so responses can be properly segmented rather than treated as one generic audience.
  • Contains four distinct readability rating scales (light-on-dark, dark-on-light, low-contrast, colored-on-colored) to quantify perception differences instead of asking one vague 'how readable is it' question.
  • Pairs quantitative satisfaction/likelihood-to-recommend scales with a ranking of alternative-to-color cues and a customization-preference question, directly connecting pain points to actionable design fixes.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that lets participants elaborate on a described accessibility incident in their own words, something a fixed-question form cannot do.

QuestionPro

Product/Service Design Survey Template

This is a generic product/service design feedback template, not built around color vision or accessibility at all. It's a ready-to-field static form suited for broad design satisfaction feedback, but a team studying color/contrast accessibility would need to substantially rewrite it. Useful only as a starting skeleton, not a purpose-built accessibility instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Part of an established survey platform with broad template variety and likely easy customization
  • Likely includes standard rating-scale questions for gauging product/service satisfaction

아쉬운 점

  • No color vision, contrast, or digital accessibility focus in the template itself
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual accessibility incidents
  • No published prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Design Feedback Survey Template

A general-purpose design feedback template aimed at gathering opinions on a design/product, not specifically color vision or contrast accessibility. It's fielding-ready for broad UX feedback collection but doesn't address diagnosed color vision differences, readability contrast scenarios, or assistive customization needs. Would require heavy rebuilding to serve this use case.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a widely-used survey platform, easy to deploy quickly
  • Likely covers general aesthetic/usability feedback with familiar question formats

아쉬운 점

  • No questions targeting color vision differences or contrast-specific readability scenarios
  • Fixed-question static form, no adaptive AI or voice interview to explore individual pain points
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.