모든 템플릿

API Developer Experience: Endpoints, Errors & Auth

Measures developer satisfaction with API endpoint clarity, error diagnostics, and authentication workflows to identify friction points and inform API roadmap priorities.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 27개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the API Developer Experience Survey. This survey asks about your recent experience with our API — specifically around endpoint clarity, error handling, and authentication. Your responses will help us identify pain points and prioritize improvements. • Estimated time: 12 minutes • Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only • There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest experience • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time Please proceed to begin.

Q02
드롭다운

In the past 30 days, how often did you interact with our API?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • Weekly
  • Once or twice
  • Not in the past 30 days
Q03
의견 척도

How clear is the URL structure and naming of our API endpoints?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q04
드롭다운

In the past 30 days, approximately how often did you encounter an API error response?

  • Never
  • Rarely (1–2 times)
  • Sometimes (3–5 times)
  • Often (6 or more times)
  • Not sure
Q05
객관식

Which authentication methods did you use or configure in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • API key
  • OAuth 2.0 — Client Credentials
  • OAuth 2.0 — Authorization Code
  • JWT / Service account
  • HMAC or request signing
  • No auth changes in the past 30 days
  • Not sure
Q06
의견 척도

Overall, how would you rate the clarity of our API (documentation, endpoints, and error messages combined)?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about your API experience.

Q08
드롭다운

Which of the following best describes your primary role?

  • Backend engineer
  • Frontend engineer
  • Full-stack developer
  • DevOps / SRE
  • Data engineer
  • Product manager
  • QA / Tester
  • Student
  • Other
Q09
메시지

Thank you for your time. Your feedback directly helps us improve the API experience for all developers.

Q10
객관식

Which of the following activities did you perform with the API in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • Reading/fetching data
  • Creating or updating records
  • Managing authentication/authorization
  • Configuring webhooks/callbacks
  • Bulk or asynchronous jobs
  • Building or maintaining integrations/SDKs
  • Testing or troubleshooting
  • Other
Q11
의견 척도

How clear are the required and optional request parameters (headers, query params, body)?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q12
객관식

Which of the following error types did you encounter? Select all that apply.

  • Validation errors (4xx)
  • Authentication failures (401)
  • Permission/scope issues (403)
  • Resource not found (404)
  • Rate limiting (429)
  • Timeouts or network errors
  • Server errors (5xx)
  • Deprecation or version errors
  • Other
Q13
의견 척도

How easy or difficult was it to generate or rotate API keys or credentials?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q14
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend our API to a fellow developer?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q15
드롭다운

How long have you been working with web APIs?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–9 years
  • 10+ years
Q16
의견 척도

How clear are the response formats and field definitions returned by our endpoints?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q17
의견 척도

How helpful were the API error messages in diagnosing and resolving issues?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all helpful최대:Extremely helpful
Q18
의견 척도

How easy or difficult was it to set up an OAuth flow (authorization code or client credentials)?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q19
순위 매기기

Rank the following areas by how much improvement would benefit your workflow (drag the highest-impact area to the top).

  1. Endpoint clarity
  2. Error message quality
  3. Authentication flows
  4. API documentation
  5. SDKs & developer tools
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q20
드롭다운

What is the approximate size of your organization?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
Q21
의견 척도

How clear is the pagination behavior (cursors, offsets, page limits) across endpoints?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q22
장문형

If you recall a particularly unhelpful error message, please paste it or summarize it briefly.

Q23
의견 척도

How easy or difficult was it to manage token refresh or session handling?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q24
객관식

Which programming languages or platforms do you primarily use with our API? Select all that apply.

  • JavaScript / TypeScript
  • Python
  • Java
  • Go
  • Ruby
  • C# / .NET
  • PHP
  • Other
Q25
장문형

Name one endpoint or area of the API that felt unclear and briefly explain why.

Q26
장문형

Describe any authentication blockers or confusing steps you encountered.

Q27
드롭다운

In which region are you primarily located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes four dedicated opinion-scale questions plus an open-text follow-up isolating endpoint, parameter, response, and pagination clarity rather than lumping 'API quality' into one vague score
  • Separates error-handling friction from auth friction with distinct question blocks (error frequency, error types, error-message helpfulness, a paste-in field for actual unhelpful error text, then a parallel set for API keys, OAuth setup, and token refresh)
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes on whatever the respondent actually reported, plus a drag-and-drop ranking of improvement priorities to directly inform roadmap decisions
  • Captures role, API experience tenure, org size, languages/platforms, and region as segmentation variables so friction points can be sliced by developer profile

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.