모든 템플릿

Company Mission and Values Alignment Survey

Measures the gap between the values a company says it holds and the values employees actually experience in day-to-day decisions, priorities, and leadership behavior. Built for HR and leadership teams auditing culture health, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent moment where a decision either honored or contradicted a stated value.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We want to know whether our stated values actually show up in how decisions get made day to day — not just how they sound on the wall. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Honest answers help most. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
매트릭스필수

Thinking about the last few months, how often have you seen each of these values actually reflected in decisions at this company? (Template note: replace the rows below with your organization's real stated values.)

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Customer Obsession (Replace with your value)
  • Integrity
  • Innovation
  • Collaboration
  • Ownership
: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Always
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how well do the decisions you see made here match the values the company says it stands for?

척도: 110
최소:Not aligned at all최대:Fully aligned
Q04
객관식필수

Which of our stated values is most often set aside when things get busy or under pressure? (Template note: replace options with your organization's real stated values.)

  • Customer Obsession (Replace with your value)
  • Integrity
  • Innovation
  • Collaboration
  • Ownership
  • None — they all hold up under pressure
Q05
순위 매기기

Rank these values by how much they actually influence real decisions here, from most to least influential in practice. (Template note: replace with your organization's real stated values.)

  1. Customer Obsession (Replace with your value)
  2. Integrity
  3. Innovation
  4. Collaboration
  5. Ownership
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
의견 척도필수

In the last 3 months, how often have you personally witnessed a decision that contradicted one of our stated values?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct one specific, recent instance the respondent witnessed of a decision that either honored or contradicted a stated company value — anchor on what was actually decided, who made the call, and what was said publicly versus what happened in practice. If they say they've never witnessed a contradiction, probe for a moment that best exemplified a value being lived out well instead, and what made it credible.

Q08
평점 척도필수

How much do you trust senior leadership to act consistently with our stated values when it's costly or inconvenient to do so?

범위: 15
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q09
객관식

Has the gap (or match) between our stated values and lived behavior affected your intent to stay at this company?

  • Yes, it makes me want to leave
  • Somewhat, I've started reconsidering
  • No effect either way
  • Yes, it makes me want to stay longer
  • Not sure
Q10
메시지

Last section — a few quick details to help us spot patterns across teams. All optional.

Q11
객관식

Which department or function are you part of?

  • Engineering
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Product
  • Operations
  • HR/People
  • Finance
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you worked at this company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leadership / executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the candor. Your responses will be aggregated into a values-alignment report for leadership, and used to identify where our stated values need real changes to how we operate, not just new language.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes a matrix and opinion-scale set that separately measures stated-value frequency versus lived decision-making, directly capturing the say-do gap rather than personal values in isolation.
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview step to reconstruct one specific, recent decision the respondent witnessed that honored or contradicted a stated value, producing concrete behavioral evidence instead of only abstract ratings.
  • Adds a ranking exercise and a multiple-choice item on which stated value gets set aside under pressure, giving leadership a prioritized, actionable view of where values erode first.
  • Closes with department, tenure, and role-level segmentation plus a trust-in-leadership rating, letting HR cross-tab the values gap by team and seniority in an auto-generated report.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.