모든 템플릿

Sales Compensation Plan Clarity and Fairness Survey

Measures whether reps understand how they're paid, whether quotas feel attainable, and how the comp plan shapes day-to-day selling behavior — built for sales leadership and RevOps. An AI follow-up reconstructs the specific moment a rep's trust in the plan was tested, going deeper than a top-line fairness score.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're reviewing the comp plan and want to hear honestly how clear, attainable, and motivating it actually is for you — your name won't be attached to individual answers. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

How clearly do you understand exactly how your commission or bonus is calculated?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all clearly최대:Extremely clearly
Q03
객관식필수

Based on the last full quarter, how attainable was your quota?

  • Unattainable even with strong effort
  • Attainable only with exceptional performance
  • Attainable with consistent, solid effort
  • Easily attainable
  • Not sure / no fixed quota
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about your current comp plan?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • It rewards the behaviors that actually drive revenue
  • My quota was set using data relevant to my territory or accounts
  • Top and average performers see meaningfully different payouts
  • I trust that commissions are calculated and paid accurately
  • It's comparable to what peers in similar roles are paid
: Strongly Disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly Agree
Q05
평점 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate the fairness of your current compensation plan?

범위: 15
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q06
의견 척도필수

How motivating is your current plan to push past quota, rather than just hit it?

척도: 17
최소:Not motivating at all최대:Extremely motivating
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these has the biggest effect on whether you see the comp plan as fair?

  • How the quota-setting process works
  • Speed and predictability of payout
  • Mid-year changes to the plan
  • Clawback or chargeback policies
  • Accelerators and decelerators at plan thresholds
  • How territories or accounts are assigned
  • How my payout compares to peers'
  • How clearly the plan is communicated
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Affects my sense of fairness the most최악:Affects my sense of fairness the least
Q08
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, how many times has your plan's structure, rates, or quota changed?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • Twice
  • Three or more times
  • Not sure
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct one specific, recent situation where the respondent's trust in the comp plan was tested — for example a deal, a payout, or a quota conversation. Ask what happened, what they expected versus what they got, and how it changed how they sell or whether they'd recommend the job to a peer. If they rated the plan as fair overall but flagged a low-agreement item in the statement battery, probe that specific gap directly.

Q10
장문형

If you could change exactly one thing about the comp plan, what would it be and why?

Q11
메시지

Just a few quick background questions to help us compare results across teams — all optional.

Q12
객관식

What's your current role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead
  • Manager
  • Director or above
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How long have you been in your current sales role?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • 5+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

Which segment do you primarily sell into?

  • Enterprise
  • Mid-market
  • SMB
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the honest answers. Responses will be aggregated and shared with sales leadership and RevOps to shape the next round of plan design.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Uses an AI follow-up interview block that reconstructs a specific recent moment when a rep's trust in the comp plan was tested, going beyond a single fairness rating
  • Pairs quantitative measures (rating-scale on pay-calculation clarity, rating on overall fairness, matrix agreement statements, best-worst trade-off on fairness drivers) with qualitative depth
  • Includes segmentation questions (role level, tenure, sales segment) so RevOps can compare results across teams
  • Captures behavioral context — quota attainability over the last full quarter and frequency of plan changes in the last 12 months — not just sentiment

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.