모든 템플릿

Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this social studies course. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest feedback helps shape how it's taught next time — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In a typical week this course, how often did you complete the assigned readings or materials before class?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • About half the time
  • Most weeks
  • Every week
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this course?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The course materials connected to real-world issues or events
  • The instructor explained concepts in ways I could understand
  • Class discussions encouraged me to think critically, not just memorize facts
  • Assignments and tests reflected what was actually taught in class
  • The pace of the course was appropriate for the material covered
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these course units did you find most valuable versus least valuable to your learning? (Template note: replace the units below with your actual course topics before launching.)

  • World History
  • U.S. History
  • Geography
  • Civics & Government
  • Economics
  • World Cultures
  • Current Events
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable최악:Least valuable
Q05
객관식

Which teaching method in this course helped you learn best?

  • Lectures
  • Small-group discussion
  • Analyzing primary sources
  • Videos or multimedia
  • Debates or simulations
  • Group projects
Q06
평점 척도

How would you rate the quality of feedback you received on assignments and tests?

범위: 15
최소:Not helpful최대:Extremely helpful
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student with similar interests?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommend score, anchoring on specifics from the course rather than general impressions — ask for a moment or assignment that shaped that score. Then explore why they picked their most and least valuable units in the trade-off question: what made one stick and the other fall flat. If they rushed through the agreement statements or gave a low completion-of-readings answer, gently probe what got in the way of engaging with the material.

Q09
장문형

If you could change one thing about this course, what would it be?

Q10
객관식

What is your current grade level or year?

  • 9th grade
  • 10th grade
  • 11th grade
  • 12th grade
  • Undergraduate
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Before taking this course, how would you describe your interest in social studies?

  • Not interested
  • Slightly interested
  • Moderately interested
  • Very interested
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your thoughtful answers! Your responses will be shared with the teaching team to help improve how this course is taught in the future.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a recommend score with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasoning behind a student's rating and unit preferences
  • Includes a max-diff unit ranking exercise to surface which specific units landed versus fell flat, not just an overall satisfaction number
  • Pairs a teaching-method multiple-choice question with a matrix of course agreement statements, giving both quantitative and qualitative signal on clarity and discussion quality
  • Captures prior interest level and grade/year alongside a long-text 'what would you change' question, giving curriculum teams context for interpreting results

QuestionPro

Social studies course evaluation survey questions + sample questionnaire template

This is the most directly comparable page, offering a sample questionnaire specifically for social studies course evaluation. It's a static question bank meant to be copied or lightly customized rather than an adaptive interview experience. Useful as a starting question list but doesn't dig deeper into individual responses.

잘하는 점

  • Subject-specific to social studies, so questions are pre-aligned to the same use case
  • Presented as a ready sample questionnaire, easy to review and adapt quickly
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type support

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question list with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a student gave a particular rating
  • No mention of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed or scored

Jotform

Create Free Course Evaluation Forms - Course Evaluation Form Templates

This is a category/gallery page of generic course evaluation form templates rather than a social-studies-specific instrument, so it requires manual customization for this use case. It's a form-builder product, strong on layout and integrations but not tailored to curriculum-review needs out of the box. No academic-specific version is presented.

잘하는 점

  • Large template gallery covering many course-evaluation variants to start from
  • Drag-and-drop form builder makes customization straightforward
  • Free tier available for basic form creation

아쉬운 점

  • Generic templates aren't tailored to social studies content, unit rankings, or discussion quality
  • Static form fields with no adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This template is built around corporate/professional training evaluation rather than an academic social studies course, so several questions and framing won't map cleanly onto a classroom curriculum review. It reads partly as a feedback guide with explanatory content alongside the template itself. Still relevant as a general course-feedback comparison point.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
  • Guide-style content explains why each question is included, useful for question design reference
  • Established templating system with logic and skip options

아쉬운 점

  • Oriented toward corporate training, not academic course content like units or discussion quality
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the reasoning behind a recommend score
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring per response

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor Feedback

This template centers on instructor feedback broadly across courses rather than social-studies-specific content like unit relevance or discussion quality. It's a ready-to-field static form, which is useful as a baseline but doesn't adapt based on how a student answers. Good as a general education-sector comparison.

잘하는 점

  • Education-sector focused, so terminology aligns reasonably well with academic settings
  • Conversational form UI that may feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning to explore the 'why' behind a recommendation score
  • No unit-level ranking mechanism (like max-diff) to identify which topics landed
  • No published prompt transparency or automated response-quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.