모든 템플릿

Employee Comfort Delegating Tasks to AI Agents

Measures how comfortable employees are handing off specific work to AI agents, what's currently delegated, how closely output gets checked, and what would build more trust. Built for HR and AI-adoption teams rolling out agentic tools, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real reasons behind hesitation or over-reliance rather than generic attitude scores.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this! We're trying to understand how comfortable people feel delegating tasks to AI agents at work, and what would make that easier. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest answers help shape how we roll out these tools — about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, which of these tasks have you delegated to an AI agent (not just a chatbot for quick questions, but something that completed a task with less oversight)?

  • Scheduling or calendar management
  • Drafting emails or documents
  • Summarizing meetings or reports
  • Data analysis or reporting
  • Customer-facing responses
  • Writing or reviewing code
  • Research or information gathering
  • I haven't delegated any tasks to an AI agent
Q03
매트릭스필수

How comfortable are you delegating each type of task to an AI agent, even if you haven't tried it yet?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Administrative or scheduling tasks
  • Drafting communications on your behalf
  • Data analysis or reporting
  • Customer-facing responses
  • Decisions that affect budget or priorities
  • 외 1개
: Very uncomfortable · Somewhat uncomfortable · Neutral · Somewhat comfortable · Very comfortable
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how much do you trust an AI agent to complete a delegated task correctly without you double-checking it?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all — I always check최대:Completely — I rarely check
Q05
객관식필수

When an AI agent completes a task for you, how often do you review its output before acting on it or sending it forward?

  • Always review it fully
  • Usually skim it
  • Occasionally spot-check
  • Rarely review it
  • Never — I use it as-is
Q06
순위 매기기필수

Rank these concerns from biggest to smallest when it comes to delegating tasks to AI agents.

  1. Errors or inaccurate output
  2. Losing my own skills or judgment
  3. Not knowing who's accountable if something goes wrong
  4. Data privacy or security
  5. Impact on my job security
  6. Quality dropping below my own standard
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these would do the most, and the least, to make you more comfortable delegating tasks to AI agents?

  • Clear logs of what the AI agent did and why
  • An easy way to undo or override its actions
  • Proof it's been tested on tasks like mine
  • Training on how to supervise it well
  • Clear rules on who's accountable for mistakes
  • Seeing colleagues use it successfully first
  • Starting with low-stakes tasks only
  • A human always reviewing before anything goes out
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would help most최악:Would help least
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the real story behind this person's comfort level with AI agents. Ask them to describe one specific recent time they delegated a task and one time they held back or double-checked everything — what made the difference. If they picked a top concern (like accountability or errors), get a concrete example of when that concern was realized or nearly was. If they said they never review output, gently check whether that's confidence or just not having noticed a problem yet.

Q09
평점 척도

How satisfied are you with the training and support your company has provided for working with AI agents?

범위: 15
최소:Very unsatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q10
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be pooled with your colleagues' to guide training, guardrails, and which tasks we roll AI agents out to next.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the real reasons behind hesitation or over-reliance, rather than stopping at a generic attitude score
  • Combines a matrix question on comfort level by task type with a multiple-choice question on what's actually been delegated in the last 30 days, so results tie stated comfort to real behavior
  • Uses a ranking question and a max-diff exercise to force trade-offs on concerns and trust-building actions, giving HR and AI-adoption teams prioritized, decision-ready data instead of flat rating averages
  • Captures oversight behavior directly (how often output gets reviewed before use) alongside satisfaction with training/support, so the report can connect trust, checking behavior, and enablement gaps

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.