QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Contactless Health Check Experience Survey

Captures how patients and employees experience contactless vital-sign screening — camera- or sensor-based checks for temperature, heart rate, or oxygen — covering ease of use, trust in accuracy, and privacy comfort. Built for clinics and workplaces piloting no-touch screening, with an AI follow-up that probes what drove doubt or confidence in the reading.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for trying our contactless health check! We'd like to hear about your experience — how easy it was, whether you trusted the results, and how it compared to a traditional check. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Where did you use the contactless health check?

  • Doctor's office or clinic waiting room
  • Workplace or office lobby
  • Pharmacy or retail health kiosk
  • Airport or travel screening point
  • At home with a personal device
Q03
객관식필수

Which of the following did the contactless check measure? Select all that apply.

  • Body temperature
  • Heart rate
  • Blood oxygen level
  • Respiratory rate
  • Blood pressure
  • Not sure
Q04
평점 척도필수

How easy was it to complete the contactless health check?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q05
의견 척도필수

How much did you trust the accuracy of the results compared to a traditional in-person check (e.g., thermometer, blood pressure cuff)?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all confident최대:Completely confident
Q06
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about the contactless check?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The check felt fast
  • I felt my privacy was respected
  • The instructions were clear
  • I felt comfortable with no physical contact
  • I understood what my results meant
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
객관식필수

Did you receive a clear explanation of your results?

  • Yes, fully explained
  • Mostly, but some questions remained
  • Only a basic pass/fail result
  • No explanation was given
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Explore what specifically shaped this respondent's trust (or distrust) in the contactless reading — did they compare it to a past traditional check, notice inconsistent results, or feel rushed? If they said their results weren't clearly explained, ask what specific question went unanswered and what they did next (asked staff, looked it up, or ignored it).

Q09
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When choosing between a contactless check and a traditional one, which of these matter most and least to you?

  • Speed of the check
  • Accuracy of the results
  • Not being touched by equipment or staff
  • Privacy of my health data
  • How clearly results were explained
  • Cost of the check
  • Availability without an appointment
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q10
객관식필수

Next time you have the option, would you choose a contactless health check over a traditional one?

  • Definitely contactless
  • Probably contactless
  • No preference
  • Probably traditional
  • Definitely traditional
Q11
장문형

Is there anything about the contactless check that confused you, worried you, or that you'd change?

Q12
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How comfortable are you generally with health technology (apps, wearables, telehealth)?

  • Very comfortable
  • Somewhat comfortable
  • Neutral
  • Somewhat uncomfortable
  • Very uncomfortable
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will help us improve the accuracy, clarity, and comfort of contactless health checks for future users.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that explores what specifically drove a respondent's trust or distrust in the reading, going beyond a static trust-rating question
  • Combines quantitative measures (rating, opinion scale, matrix, max-diff) with open-ended long-text and adaptive probing in one flow, so both patterns and reasons are captured
  • Separates use-context (clinic vs. workplace), measurement type, and demographic/tech-comfort questions so results can be segmented without extra surveys
  • Ends with a clear wrap-up message and produces an auto-generated report, so teams don't have to manually compile findings from a static form

QuestionPro

Contactless health check survey template

This is the closest direct competitor, covering the same core topic of contactless vital-sign screening experience. It appears to be a standard fielding-ready template with fixed questions rather than an adaptive interview flow. No indication it offers voice-based or AI-probed follow-up on trust/accuracy perceptions.

잘하는 점

  • Directly targets the same contactless health screening use case
  • Likely offers quick deployment as a ready-made template within a broader survey platform
  • Backed by an established survey platform with wide question-type support

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent trusted or doubted the reading — likely fixed questions only
  • No indication of voice AI interview capability or screen-share guided tasks
  • No published methodology for how question order or logic was designed, unlike transparent prompt design

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기