모든 템플릿

Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check

Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how your team is working together. Your honest input helps us fix what's actually getting in the way. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate your team's performance over the last quarter?

척도: 010
최소:Far below expectations최대:Far exceeds expectations
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your team?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • My team communicates openly about problems and roadblocks
  • My team meets its commitments and deadlines
  • My team resolves disagreements without lingering tension
  • Team members hold each other accountable for quality work
  • My team makes decisions quickly enough to keep work moving
  • 외 1개
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did your team hit its stated deadlines?

  • Always
  • Most of the time
  • About half the time
  • Rarely
  • Never / not applicable
Q05
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the clarity of communication within your team over the last month?

범위: 15
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these areas most needs improvement for your team to perform better, and which matters least right now?

  • Communication and information-sharing
  • Clarity of goals and priorities
  • Accountability for commitments
  • Speed of decision-making
  • Workload balance across the team
  • Skills or knowledge gaps
  • Support from leadership/manager
  • Cross-team collaboration
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most needs improvement최악:Least needs improvement
Q07
점수 배분필수

Thinking about a typical work week, how does your team's collaborative time actually get spent? Distribute 100 points across these activities.

  • Planning and alignment
  • Focused execution / deep work
  • Meetings and status updates
  • Unblocking and problem-solving
  • Administrative tasks
100점 배분
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct a specific, recent example behind the respondent's overall performance rating and their top-priority improvement area from the trade-off question: what happened, who was involved, and what got in the way. If the rating was high, probe what specifically is working so it can be reinforced. If it was low, push for what a fix would concretely look like and who would need to act on it.

Q09
객관식필수

How confident are you that your team will meet its goals this quarter?

  • Not at all confident
  • Slightly confident
  • Moderately confident
  • Very confident
  • Extremely confident
Q10
객관식

Which best describes your role on this team?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / manager
  • Director or above
  • Other
Q11
객관식

How long have you been part of this team?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with your teammates' answers into a summary report used to strengthen how this team works, not to evaluate any individual.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific, recent example behind the respondent's biggest rated gap, turning a vague low score into an actionable incident instead of leaving it as a number
  • Combines quick quantitative pulse questions (opinion scale, matrix agreement, deadline frequency, communication rating, max-diff prioritization, constant-sum time allocation) with role and tenure context so results can be segmented by who is answering
  • Ends with a transparent, respondent-friendly close explaining that responses will be combined with teammates' answers, setting expectations for aggregated reporting
  • Built specifically for managers and HR/People teams running recurring quarterly or post-project pulse checks, not a generic one-off satisfaction survey

Jotform

Team Performance Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready, customizable form template covering general team performance questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's designed for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payments, workflows, etc.). It is a static question set with no mechanism to probe deeper into any individual response.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form builder interface
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform (notifications, workflows, storage)
  • Low barrier to quick deployment for teams already using Jotform

아쉬운 점

  • Static question list with no adaptive follow-up to dig into specific low scores or incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology or transparent prompt logic behind question design

SurveyMonkey

Team Performance Survey: Questions & Template

SurveyMonkey offers a template built from expert-written question sets aimed at gauging team performance, backed by their established survey analytics and benchmarking tools. It's a solid fixed-format questionnaire but relies on respondents' self-rated closed answers without follow-up. Reporting is analytics-dashboard based rather than narrative incident reconstruction.

잘하는 점

  • Well-established survey analytics and dashboard reporting
  • Question set informed by SurveyMonkey's broad survey-design experience
  • Easy to launch to teams already using SurveyMonkey's distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore the story behind a low-rated area
  • No voice-based interview option for open-ended reflection
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

QuestionPro

Top 15 Teamwork Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is primarily an educational/reference page listing sample teamwork survey questions rather than a single fielding-ready template, though QuestionPro's platform can operationalize the questions. It's useful as a question-bank reference for teams building their own survey. It does not present a packaged, ready-to-send instrument with built-in reporting the way a template page typically would.

잘하는 점

  • Curated list of teamwork-focused questions covering multiple dimensions
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey platform capabilities
  • Useful as a reference for teams designing their own custom questionnaire

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a guide/question list rather than a ready-to-field packaged template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind any specific answer
  • No automated per-response scoring or auto-generated qualitative reporting mentioned

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.