모든 템플릿

Donor Stewardship & Impact Transparency Survey

Measures donor satisfaction with recognition practices, organizational transparency, and impact reporting quality to inform stewardship strategy and improve donor retention.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for taking part in this survey about your experience as a donor to our organization. This survey takes approximately 6–8 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Your feedback will be used internally to improve our donor communications, recognition practices, and impact reporting. By proceeding, you confirm that you have read and understood this information.

Q02
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you made a donation to our organization?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with the donor recognition you received from us in the last 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
의견 척도

How transparent has our organization been about how your donations were used in the last 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all transparent최대:Extremely transparent
Q05
객관식

Through which channels would you prefer to receive impact and financial updates from us? Select all that apply.

  • Email newsletter
  • One-to-one email from staff
  • SMS / text message
  • Mailed letter
  • Website or blog updates
  • Social media
  • Donor portal or dashboard
  • Webinar or virtual briefing
  • In-person events
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
장문형

What one change would most improve how we report on the impact of your donations or our organizational transparency?

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is invaluable in helping us improve our donor stewardship and transparency practices. We appreciate your continued support.

Q09
드롭다운

Approximately how many separate donations did you make to us in the last 12 months?

  • Once
  • 2–3 times
  • 4–6 times
  • 7–10 times
  • More than 10 times
Q10
객관식

Which of the following forms of recognition did you personally receive from us in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Thank-you email
  • Handwritten note
  • Name listed publicly (e.g., website or report)
  • Recognition at an event
  • Impact update tied to my gift
  • Small thank-you gift
  • None of the above / I did not receive recognition
Q11
객관식

How often did you receive impact or financial updates from us in the last 12 months?

  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • Quarterly
  • Twice a year
  • Once a year
  • I don't recall receiving updates
Q12
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your responses so far.

Q13
드롭다운

How do you describe your gender?

  • Man
  • Woman
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

Which of the following best describe your reasons for donating to us? Please select up to 3.

  • Belief in our mission
  • Personal connection to the cause
  • Visible community impact
  • Trust in organizational transparency
  • Recognition/appreciation
  • Tax deduction
  • Recommendation from someone I trust
  • Employer match available
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
순위 매기기

Please rank the following recognition methods in order of your preference, from most to least preferred.

  1. Personalized email
  2. Handwritten note
  3. Impact story with outcomes
  4. Name listed in report or website
  5. Small thank-you gift
  6. Invitation to donor webinar or briefing
  7. Recognition at events
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q16
의견 척도

How would you rate the clarity of our impact reports in explaining how donations were used?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q17
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your overall donor experience with us.

Q18
드롭다운

Where do you currently live?

  • United States
  • Canada
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • European Union
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

How would you rate the timeliness of the impact updates you received from us?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all timely최대:Extremely timely
Q20
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • High school or less
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

How well did our impact reports use specific data or measurable outcomes to demonstrate results?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all well최대:Extremely well
Q22
의견 척도

How well did our impact reports include real-world stories or examples to illustrate our work?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all well최대:Extremely well

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview segment that can probe deeper into donor sentiment beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Combines quantitative opinion-scale ratings on recognition, transparency, and report clarity with open-text and ranking questions for richer stewardship insight
  • Separates recognition experience from impact-reporting quality (clarity, timeliness, data use, storytelling) so nonprofits can pinpoint exactly what to fix
  • Ends with an open-ended reflection question plus structured demographics, giving both narrative and segmentable data for retention strategy

QuestionPro

Nonprofit Donor Feedback Survey Questions + Sample Survey Template

This is a sample question bank and template page for nonprofit donor feedback rather than a ready-to-field adaptive interview. It covers general donor satisfaction themes and can be customized within QuestionPro's survey builder. Good starting point for basic feedback collection but static in format.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with broad question-type library
  • Provides a curated set of sample donor feedback questions as a starting template
  • Supports standard skip logic and reporting typical of QuestionPro's builder

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing—respondents answer fixed questions only
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • Does not publish transparent prompt-level methodology behind question logic

SurveyMonkey

Donor Feedback Survey Template: Ask Smart Questions to Improve Every Event

A static, ready-to-use template focused on event-oriented donor feedback rather than deeper stewardship or transparency themes. Easy to deploy and benefits from SurveyMonkey's familiar builder and analytics, but questions are fixed once launched. Best suited to quick post-event pulse checks rather than in-depth impact reporting evaluation.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known, easy-to-use builder with fast deployment
  • Template is tailored toward event feedback, useful for donor-event follow-up
  • Includes standard analytics/reporting dashboards

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up interviewing
  • No voice AI interview or guided task/screen-share capability
  • Limited depth on transparency/impact-reporting quality compared to a dedicated stewardship survey

SurveySparrow

Charity Donor Feedback Survey

A conversational-style, ready-to-field template aimed at general charity donor feedback. It leverages SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format but relies on pre-set question flows rather than true AI-driven interviewing. Useful for basic satisfaction pulse-checks but not focused specifically on stewardship or impact-report transparency.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational UI format that may feel more engaging than plain forms
  • Ready-to-use charity-focused template
  • Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product

아쉬운 점

  • No genuine adaptive AI interviewing—conversational UI is still a fixed question path
  • No voice AI interview or automated per-response quality scoring
  • Does not focus deeply on impact-reporting clarity, data use, or storytelling quality

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.