모든 템플릿

Boredom Proneness Scale for Workplace Engagement

Measures how prone employees are to feeling bored or understimulated at work, using a trait-style statement battery, situational triggers, and coping responses. Built for HR, L&D, and people-analytics teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent boring moment to separate personality-driven boredom proneness from fixable role-design problems.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how boredom shows up in your work day. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right or wrong answers here — honest responses are what make this useful. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about yourself?

7개 행 × 5개 열
  • It's easy for me to stay focused on my work tasks.
  • I often find myself with time on my hands and nothing to do.
  • During the day, time seems to drag on and on.
  • I get bored more easily than most of my coworkers.
  • I need a lot of variety in my work to stay interested in it.
  • 외 2개
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
의견 척도필수

Thinking about the last 30 days, how often did you feel bored or understimulated during your work day?

척도: 010
최소:Never최대:Nearly all day, every day
Q04
객관식

Which of the following most often leave you feeling bored at work? Select all that apply.

  • Routine or repetitive tasks
  • Meetings without a clear agenda
  • Waiting for input or approval from others
  • Training or onboarding sessions
  • Slow periods with light workload
  • Tasks that don't match my skills or interests
Q05
순위 매기기

When you feel bored at work, how do you typically respond? Rank these from your most common response (top) to your least common (bottom).

  1. Look for something else productive to do
  2. Let my mind wander
  3. Ask for additional or different work
  4. Scroll social media or browse online
  5. Chat with coworkers
  6. Push through and wait it out
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
슬라이더 매트릭스

How boring do you find each of these, on a typical day?

5개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • Attending routine meetings
  • Doing repetitive administrative tasks
  • Waiting for approvals or handoffs
  • Completing required training
  • Working during slow or quiet periods
슬라이더 0–10최소:Not boring at all최대:Extremely boring
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to describe the most recent specific moment they felt bored at work: what task or situation triggered it, how long it lasted, and what they did in response. Anchor on whether the boredom came from too little stimulation (repetitive tasks, understaffed slow periods) or too much friction (unclear priorities, waiting on others). If their earlier answers suggested high boredom proneness overall, probe whether this feels like a lasting personal trait or a symptom of how their current role is designed.

Q08
메시지

Just a few quick background questions — all optional — to help us see patterns across teams.

Q09
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식

How long have you worked at your current organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • 5-10 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

What best describes your current work arrangement?

  • Fully onsite
  • Hybrid
  • Fully remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
드롭다운

Which department or team are you part of? (Template note: replace this list with your organization's actual department names before launching.)

  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Engineering/Production
  • Administration
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed into a report on where and why boredom shows up in day-to-day work, so we can redesign the parts that don't need to be dull.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated agree/disagree statement battery for trait-level boredom proneness, not just a generic Likert template
  • Adds situational triggers (multiple-choice) and a ranked coping-response question so responses map to real workplace behavior, not just abstract agreement
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct a specific recent boring moment, separating personality-driven boredom proneness from fixable role-design issues — something no static form can do
  • Pairs a slider matrix on daily task boredom with optional demographic and tenure questions so HR/L&D teams can segment results by department, work arrangement, and time at company

QuestionPro

Boredom Proneness Scale Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a directly comparable, topic-matched template built around the classic Boredom Proneness Scale item set. It's presented as a static questionnaire with sample questions rather than an adaptive interview, so it works well for straightforward academic-style scoring but not for probing individual responses. Good reference for question wording, less useful for distinguishing trait boredom from workplace/role factors.

잘하는 점

  • Directly matches the boredom proneness topic with a recognizable scale-based question set
  • Likely includes sample questionnaire structure useful for quick deployment
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and reporting tools

아쉬운 점

  • Static Likert-style form with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a respondent feels bored
  • No mechanism to separate stable trait boredom proneness from situational or role-design causes
  • No published methodology on how per-response scoring or interpretation is derived

SurveyMonkey

Likert Scale Survey Template

This is a generic Likert scale template, not a boredom-proneness-specific instrument — a team would need to substitute in all boredom-related statements themselves. It's a solid general-purpose scaffold for agree/disagree batteries but offers no boredom triggers, coping-response ranking, or workplace-engagement framing out of the box.

잘하는 점

  • Flexible, well-known template usable for any agree/disagree statement battery
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature distribution and basic reporting features
  • Easy starting point for teams already familiar with the platform

아쉬운 점

  • No boredom-specific content — trigger questions, coping rankings, and situational context must be built from scratch
  • Purely static scale with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual boredom experiences
  • No built-in way to separate personality-driven boredom from fixable job-design issues

SurveySparrow

Free Likert Scale Questionnaire Template

Another generic, customizable Likert scale template rather than a purpose-built boredom proneness instrument — 'boredom' isn't the subject, agreement-scale methodology is. It's a reasonable base for building a trait statement battery but lacks any of the situational, coping, or interview-based components the topic calls for, and would need substantial customization for workplace boredom research.

잘하는 점

  • Customizable Likert framework adaptable to many survey topics
  • Conversational survey format may improve completion rates
  • Simple to adapt for HR teams already using SurveySparrow

아쉬운 점

  • Not boredom-specific out of the box; all trait statements, triggers, and coping items must be authored manually
  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a real recent boring moment or probe root causes
  • No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation tied to boredom proneness specifically

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.