모든 템플릿

Distance Learning Experience Survey for Teachers

Captures how teachers are actually experiencing remote and hybrid instruction — platform use, engagement and assessment challenges, confidence levels, and support priorities — for school and district leaders planning training and tools. An AI follow-up interview digs into each teacher's single biggest obstacle and what would genuinely fix it, not just a wish list.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Hi! We're gathering feedback from teachers on distance and hybrid learning to figure out what's working and what support you actually need. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 6-7 minutes, and there are no right or wrong answers — just your real experience.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your current teaching setup?

  • Fully remote
  • Hybrid (some in-person, some remote)
  • Occasional remote days
  • Not currently teaching remotely
Q03
객관식필수

Which platform do you use most often to teach or manage remote lessons?

  • Zoom
  • Google Classroom
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Canvas
  • Seesaw
Q04
매트릭스필수

How difficult or easy is each of the following in a distance or hybrid learning format?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Keeping students engaged during lessons
  • Assessing whether students understand the material
  • Communicating with parents or guardians
  • Managing technical issues in real time
  • Maintaining work-life boundaries
: Very difficult · Somewhat difficult · Neutral · Somewhat easy · Very easy
Q05
의견 척도필수

Compared to in-person teaching, how would you rate your ability to build relationships with students in a distance or hybrid format?

척도: 17
최소:Much worse than in-person최대:Much better than in-person
Q06
슬라이더 매트릭스필수

How confident do you feel in each of the following right now?

4개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • Delivering an engaging lesson remotely
  • Using your platform's tools effectively
  • Troubleshooting technical issues on your own
  • Supporting a struggling student remotely
슬라이더 0–10최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q07
숫자필수

In a typical week, how many hours do you spend specifically preparing materials for distance or hybrid instruction (e.g., recording videos, building online assignments)?

Q08
객관식필수

Have you received formal training on distance learning tools and teaching methods from your school or district?

  • Yes, extensive training
  • Yes, some training
  • No formal training, mostly self-taught
  • No training at all
Q09
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of the following would most improve your distance or hybrid teaching experience?

  • More dedicated planning time
  • More reliable technology or devices
  • Formal training on remote teaching methods
  • Smaller class sizes for remote instruction
  • Dedicated IT support staff
  • Clearer communication from school/district leadership
  • Additional pay or compensation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most helpful최악:Least helpful
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Identify the single biggest obstacle this teacher faces in distance or hybrid teaching, using their matrix and confidence ratings as a starting point, and get a concrete recent example of it happening. Push past generic complaints like 'engagement' or 'tech issues' to specifics: what exactly went wrong, with which students or tools, and what they tried. If they picked a top support priority in the trade-off exercise, ask what that support would need to look like in practice to actually solve the problem, not just help a little.

Q11
객관식

What grade level(s) do you primarily teach?

  • Elementary (K-5)
  • Middle school (6-8)
  • High school (9-12)
  • Post-secondary
Q12
객관식

How many years of teaching experience do you have?

  • 0-2 years
  • 3-5 years
  • 6-10 years
  • 11-20 years
  • More than 20 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

What type of school do you teach at?

  • Public
  • Private
  • Charter
  • Homeschool co-op
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your answers will be combined with other teachers' feedback to shape training, tools, and support decisions — no individual responses will be shared with your school.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static rating questions with an AI follow-up interview that digs into each teacher's single biggest obstacle and probes for what would genuinely fix it, not just a wish list
  • Combines structured measurement (platform use, a difficulty matrix, a confidence slider-matrix, and a MaxDiff prioritization of fixes) with open-ended AI probing in one flow
  • Segments respondents by grade level, years of experience, and school type so district leaders can see whether obstacles and confidence levels differ by teacher group
  • Uses transparent, published prompts and automated per-response quality scoring, then rolls results into an auto-generated report for leaders planning training and tools

QuestionPro

Distance learning survey template for teachers

A ready-to-field template covering teachers' distance-learning experience, likely with standard rating and multiple-choice items. It's aimed at the same audience as ours but appears to rely on fixed questions rather than any adaptive probing. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the 'why' behind a teacher's answers.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for teachers' distance-learning feedback
  • Part of a large established survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Fielding-ready template, not just a guide

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a teacher's specific biggest obstacle
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
  • No academic-specific pricing tier comparable claims possible

Jotform

Distance Learning Survey Form Template

A customizable form-builder template for gathering distance-learning feedback, strong on form design and easy distribution. It's a static questionnaire rather than an interview, so it can collect ratings and comments but can't probe further based on a teacher's specific answer. Best suited to simple, low-friction data collection.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform
  • Simple distribution and embedding options
  • Fielding-ready template for quick use

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No auto-generated analysis report built into the template

SurveyMonkey

Distance Learning Survey Template

A coronavirus-era distance learning template from a major survey platform, likely covering general satisfaction and challenge questions. It's a static survey rather than a conversational interview, so it captures broad sentiment but not the depth of an individual teacher's biggest obstacle. Useful for quick pulse-checks, less for diagnostic depth.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a widely used, established survey platform
  • Likely includes benchmarking and reporting tools common to SurveyMonkey
  • Fielding-ready template for fast deployment

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore individual obstacles in depth
  • No guided task or screen-share component for platform-use observation
  • No transparent prompt-level methodology published

SurveySparrow

Distance Learning Check-in Bot Template

A conversational chatbot-style check-in template, closer in format to a chat experience than a typical form. It offers a friendlier, sequential question flow but the bot follows a scripted path rather than adaptively probing based on a teacher's specific response. Good for lightweight, recurring check-ins rather than deep diagnostic interviews.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style format that feels less like a static form
  • Designed for repeated check-ins over time
  • Fielding-ready template built for quick launch

아쉬운 점

  • Scripted bot flow, not true adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated obstacle identification
  • No voice AI interview option

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.