모든 템플릿

Educator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey

Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this survey about educators' experiences with artificial intelligence tools. For this survey, "AI" includes tools such as ChatGPT, built-in AI features in learning management systems or productivity apps, AI writing assistants, and image or audio generators. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. All responses are anonymous and will be reported in aggregate only. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experiences and opinions. This survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete.

Q02
객관식

Which levels do you currently teach? Select all that apply.

  • Elementary (K–5)
  • Middle (6–8)
  • High school (9–12)
  • Higher education
  • Adult/continuing education
  • Other
Q03
객관식

In the past 6 months, how often have you personally used AI tools for teaching or preparation?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • 1–3 times per month
  • About weekly
  • Multiple times per week
Q04
객관식

Which best describes your institution's current stance on AI use?

  • Clear written policy
  • Informal guidelines
  • Under exploration
  • No policy
  • Not sure
Q05
의견 척도

Since AI tools became available in your context, how has student engagement in learning activities changed?

척도: 15
최소:Significantly decreased최대:Significantly increased
Q06
의견 척도

Overall, how beneficial has AI been for your teaching practice?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all beneficial최대:Extremely beneficial
Q07
순위 매기기

Please rank the following AI guardrail priorities from most to least important to you.

  1. Data privacy and security
  2. Transparency/disclosure to students
  3. Reducing bias and harmful outputs
  4. Teacher oversight and accountability
  5. Age-appropriate boundaries
  6. Accessibility and inclusion
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts, examples, or concerns about AI in your teaching.

Q09
드롭다운

How many years have you been teaching?

  • 0–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–15
  • 16–20
  • 21+
Q10
메시지

Thank you for your time — your insights will help inform practical, evidence-based guidance for educators navigating AI integration.

Q11
객관식

Which AI tools or features have you used for teaching in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.

  • ChatGPT or similar chatbots
  • Built-in AI in LMS (e.g., Canvas, Google Classroom features)
  • AI in productivity apps (e.g., Slides/Docs, PowerPoint/Word)
  • AI writing assistants (e.g., Grammarly, QuillBot)
  • Image generation tools
  • Speech-to-text or text-to-speech
  • Assessment/feedback tools with AI
  • None of the above
  • Other
Q12
의견 척도

How clear are the current AI guidelines for your role?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q13
의견 척도

Since AI tools became available, how has the overall quality of student work changed?

척도: 15
최소:Significantly decreased최대:Significantly increased
Q14
의견 척도

How likely are you to continue or expand your use of AI tools for teaching over the next 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q15
객관식

What support would help you use AI responsibly this term? Select all that apply.

  • Example lesson plans or use cases
  • Policy and disclosure templates
  • Student-facing guidance materials
  • Professional development workshops
  • One-on-one coaching or office hours
  • Peer community of practice
  • I do not plan to use AI
  • Other
Q16
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn more about your experiences with AI in teaching. Please share your thoughts, and we may ask a couple of follow-up questions.

Q17
객관식

What is your current teaching employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Long-term substitute
  • Short-term/on-call substitute
  • Adjunct/contingent
  • Other
Q18
객관식

For which of the following tasks have you used AI tools in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.

  • Lesson planning or curriculum design
  • Creating assignments or assessments
  • Generating instructional materials (slides, handouts, worksheets)
  • Grading or providing student feedback
  • Differentiating instruction for diverse learners
  • Administrative tasks (emails, reports, communications)
  • Research or professional learning
  • Student-facing activities (tutoring tools, practice exercises)
  • None of the above
  • Other
Q19
객관식

Which safeguards are currently in place at your institution? Select all that apply.

  • Student data privacy restrictions
  • Age-based access controls
  • Plagiarism/AI-detection workflows
  • Required disclosure of AI use
  • Allowlist or restricted list of AI tools
  • Human review requirements
  • None that I am aware of
  • Other
Q20
의견 척도

Since AI tools became available, how has the time you spend on lesson planning and preparation changed?

척도: 15
최소:Significantly decreased최대:Significantly increased
Q21
드롭다운

Where do you primarily teach?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • European Union
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

Since AI tools became available, how have concerns about academic integrity in your classes changed?

척도: 15
최소:Significantly decreased최대:Significantly increased
Q23
객관식

What is the highest degree you have completed?

  • High school or equivalent
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate/EdD/PhD
  • Other
Q24
의견 척도

Since AI tools became available, how has your overall teaching workload changed?

척도: 15
최소:Significantly decreased최대:Significantly increased
Q25
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
객관식

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Purpose-built to measure AI adoption specifics — usage frequency, specific tools/features, and task-level use cases — rather than general classroom quality, giving institutions actionable evidence-based data on AI integration.
  • Captures institutional policy clarity, current safeguards, and guardrail priorities (via a dedicated ranking question), which generic education templates don't address at all.
  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview alongside opinion-scale questions on engagement, work quality, workload, and academic integrity shifts, so open-ended nuance is captured automatically instead of left to unstructured comments.
  • Spans K-12 and higher ed with teaching-level, employment-status, and tenure/demographic questions, letting institutions segment findings by educator subgroup rather than relying on a single audience template.

SurveySparrow

Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary Levels

This is a fielding-ready static form aimed at elementary classroom observation, not AI adoption research — the topic overlap with our survey is limited to shared education/teacher audience. It's useful for instructional quality checks but has no content on AI tool usage, policy, or guardrails. Best viewed as an adjacent education template rather than a direct competitor for this specific research goal.

잘하는 점

  • Focused, easy-to-deploy template tailored to elementary classroom observation workflows
  • Built on SurveySparrow's survey platform, so it likely supports standard question branching and reporting
  • Clear, narrow scope makes it quick for observers to complete

아쉬운 점

  • No content addressing AI tool usage, institutional AI policy, or classroom AI impact — off-topic for AI adoption research
  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to probe open-ended educator experiences
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report; results would need manual analysis

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.