모든 템플릿

Data Residency & Sovereignty Preferences Survey

Measures user and organizational preferences for data storage location, cross-border transfer conditions, and governance trade-offs to inform product policy, compliance strategy, and trust-building initiatives.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 20개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey explores your preferences for data storage locations, cross-border transfer conditions, and related trade-offs. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.

Q02
객관식

Are you responding to this survey for personal use or on behalf of an organization?

  • Personal use (myself)
  • On behalf of an organization
Q03
의견 척도

How familiar are you with the concept of data residency (i.e., where data is physically stored and processed)?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q04
객관식

Do you currently require data to be stored in a specific country or region?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q05
순위 매기기

Please rank the following factors by how much they influence your data residency decisions. Drag to reorder (top = most important).

  1. Regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA)
  2. Legal jurisdiction and liability
  3. Performance and latency
  4. Availability and disaster recovery
  5. Provider transparency and auditability
  6. Price and total cost
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
의견 척도

How confident are you that your current or prospective vendors can meet your data residency requirements?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q07
드롭다운

In which region are you (or your organization) primarily located?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey! Your input will help us design data residency options that better meet your needs.

Q09
드롭다운

Approximately how many employees are in your organization?

  • 1–9
  • 10–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000+
  • Not applicable
Q10
의견 척도

How familiar are you with the concept of data sovereignty (i.e., data being subject to the laws of the country where it is stored)?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q11
객관식

Which locations are acceptable for storing your data? Select all that apply.

  • In-country only (no cross-border transfers)
  • Within my broader region (e.g., EU, US, APAC)
  • European Union member states
  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia or New Zealand
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
객관식

Which conditions, if any, would make cross-border data transfers acceptable to you? Select all that apply.

  • In-country only — no transfers under any conditions
  • Transfers allowed under Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs)
  • Transfers allowed under Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs)
  • Transfers allowed where adequacy decisions exist
  • Allowed if customer-managed encryption keys stay in-country
  • Allowed if data is anonymized or pseudonymized
  • Not sure
Q13
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or concerns about your data residency or sovereignty needs.

Q14
드롭다운

Which of the following best describes your role in data governance or technology decisions?

  • IT / Engineering
  • Security / Compliance
  • Legal / Privacy
  • Executive leadership
  • Procurement / Vendor management
  • Other
  • Not applicable
Q15
의견 척도

How important is the physical location of data storage when you choose a product or service?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all important최대:Extremely important
Q16
객관식

Which data residency arrangement would best suit your needs?

  • Single-country only
  • Regional within a geography (e.g., EU-only, US-only)
  • Multi-region with customer choice per dataset
  • Provider-managed best-effort regional placement (no hard guarantees)
  • No preference
  • Not sure
Q17
드롭다운

What percentage premium, if any, would you be willing to pay for guaranteed in-country data storage?

  • 0% — not willing to pay more
  • 1–5%
  • 6–10%
  • 11–20%
  • More than 20%
  • Not sure
Q18
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn a bit more about your data residency priorities. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions.

Q19
드롭다운

When will you next review or decide on data residency requirements?

  • Actively selecting now
  • Within 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • More than 12 months
  • No plans to review
  • Not applicable
Q20
객관식

Which of the following would prevent you from adopting a product or service? Select all that apply.

  • Data stored outside my specified location
  • Cross-border transfers without clear transparency
  • Inability to audit or verify data location
  • No residency-related SLAs or commitments
  • No option for customer-managed encryption keys
  • Regulatory non-compliance risk
  • Significantly higher total cost
  • Significant performance degradation
  • Other (please specify)

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Our template combines closed-ended questions (opinion scales, rankings, multiple choice) with an adaptive AI follow-up interview that lets respondents elaborate on their data residency priorities in their own words, moderated by AI rather than a static open-text box.
  • It captures nuanced governance trade-offs — willingness-to-pay premiums for in-country storage, acceptable cross-border transfer conditions, and deal-breaker criteria — rather than a single generic satisfaction or intent question.
  • Built-in per-response quality scoring and transparent, auditable prompts mean compliance and product teams can trust the qualitative AI-interview data enough to cite it in policy decisions.
  • Results roll into an auto-generated report segmenting respondents by organizational role, employee count, and region, so product and compliance stakeholders get a ready-made breakdown rather than raw export data.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.