모든 템플릿

Internal Process Time-Waste & Automation Opportunity Survey

Pinpoints which internal processes waste the most employee time, how often people route around official steps with workarounds, and which tasks are the best candidates for automation. Built for ops, IT, or PMO teams doing a process-improvement audit; the AI follow-up reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers so you know exactly what to fix first.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this one. We're mapping out which internal processes cost the most time and where people build workarounds, so we can prioritize fixes and automation. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes, and honest answers (even 'I skip that step') are exactly what we need.

Q02
객관식필수

Which of the following processes do you interact with at least monthly? (Template note: replace this list with your organization's actual core processes, e.g. expense reporting, ticket routing, onboarding, procurement approvals.)

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
  • (Replace with process specific to your org)
Q03
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Across the processes below, which wastes the MOST of your time and which wastes the LEAST? (Template note: swap in the 6-9 processes most relevant to your organization.)

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Wastes the most time최악:Wastes the least time
Q04
숫자필수

In a typical week, how many hours do you estimate you spend on manual, repetitive, or duplicate work caused by these processes?

Q05
의견 척도필수

In the last 30 days, how often did you use an unofficial workaround (a spreadsheet, a side channel, a manual fix) instead of following the official process?

척도: 010
최소:Never used a workaround최대:Used one almost every time
Q06
매트릭스필수

How often does each of the following happen to you at work?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • I redo work because a system or process failed the first time
  • I wait on someone else's manual approval before I can proceed
  • I re-enter the same data into more than one system
  • I ask a colleague how to get around a slow official step
: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Almost always
Q07
객관식

For which of these processes do you (or your team) regularly use a workaround instead of the documented steps? (Template note: mirror the process list used earlier.)

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
Q08
장문형

Briefly describe the workaround you use most often and why the official process didn't work for that situation.

Q09
객관식필수

Which single process would you most want automated or streamlined first?

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
Q10
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that automating this process would actually save meaningful time, without creating new problems?

척도: 15
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q11
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific process the respondent flagged as the biggest time-waster or automation candidate: walk through the exact steps they take today, where the delay or duplication actually happens, and what tool or manual fix they lean on instead. If they mentioned a workaround, get concrete detail on how it's done and who else relies on it, since that reveals hidden risk. If they said they're not confident automation would help, probe what past attempt or system limitation makes them skeptical.

Q12
메시지

Almost done — just a couple of quick background questions to help us group the findings by team.

Q13
객관식

Which department or function do you primarily work in? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list.)

  • Operations
  • Finance
  • IT / Engineering
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • HR / People
  • Marketing
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

How long have you worked at the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a process-improvement backlog we'll use to prioritize fixes and automation over the next planning cycle.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated MaxDiff question to force-rank which processes waste the most time, not just a generic satisfaction scale
  • Pairs quantitative workaround-frequency questions (rating-scale, matrix) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers
  • Closes with a open-text + AI interview combo specifically aimed at extracting 'why the official process doesn't work,' turning vague complaints into concrete process-fix candidates
  • Ends in an auto-generated report designed for ops/IT/PMO teams to prioritize automation targets, not just a raw response export

Jotform

Process Improvement Survey Form Template

A static, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive questioning. Good for basic feedback collection, not deep root-cause investigation.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization
  • Part of a large, mature form template library
  • Simple to deploy quickly

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual answers
  • No mechanism to reconstruct specific workaround steps behind a time-waste report
  • No automated per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Tool And Process Improvement Survey Template

A standard static survey template from an established survey platform, likely paired with SurveyMonkey's benchmarking and analytics features. It's ready to field but built around fixed-choice and scale questions rather than conversational follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a well-known, established survey platform
  • Likely includes analytics/benchmarking dashboards
  • Straightforward to launch at scale

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into individual open-ended answers
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology for how follow-ups would be generated

SurveySparrow

Process Improvement Survey Template

A conversational-style form template with sample questions, good for a friendlier respondent experience. It's still a fixed, pre-scripted question flow rather than a dynamic AI-driven interview that adapts to each answer.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like UI for higher completion rates
  • Includes sample questions to speed up setup
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No mechanism to reconstruct workaround steps behind a flagged answer
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

Typeform

Process Improvement Survey Template

A polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time template known for strong design and UX. It's a static template with predefined questions and branching logic, not a genuinely adaptive AI interview.

잘하는 점

  • Strong visual design and respondent experience
  • Simple logic-based branching between questions
  • Widely used, familiar tool for internal surveys

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No built-in method to reconstruct the specific steps behind a reported workaround

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.