Clinical & Professional Supervision Quality Evaluation
Measures how well a supervisor delivers feedback, availability, psychological safety, and case guidance to the people they supervise — built for healthcare, social work, counseling, and training programs. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent supervision moment behind the overall rating, surfacing what actually helped or hindered instead of vague satisfaction talk.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last month, how often did you have a scheduled one-on-one supervision session?
- Never
- Once
- 2-3 times
- Weekly or more often
- Supervision is on-demand, not scheduled
Thinking about your supervisor over the last 3 months, how often did they do each of the following?
- Gave clear, actionable feedback on my work
- Was available when I needed timely support
- Helped me apply policies or protocols correctly to real cases
- Encouraged me to reflect on my own reasoning rather than just handing me the answer
- Created a safe space to discuss mistakes without fear of blame
- 외 1개
How comfortable do you feel raising a mistake or concern with your supervisor?
Overall, how would you rate the quality of supervision you've received in the last 3 months?
Which format best describes most of your supervision sessions?
- One-on-one, in person
- One-on-one, video or phone call
- Group supervision session
- Informal or ad hoc check-ins
- A mix of formats
Which of these matter most to your growth as a professional, and which matter least, when it comes to what your supervisor provides?
- Clinical or technical guidance on cases
- Emotional support and encouragement
- Career development advice
- Timely feedback on my work
- Availability and responsiveness
- Constructive handling of mistakes
- Help prioritizing my caseload or workload
Anchor on the respondent's overall quality rating and ask them to walk through one specific, recent supervision interaction that best explains that score — what the situation was, what the supervisor did or said, and what the outcome was. Probe for a concrete example rather than a general impression, and if the rating was very low or very high, ask directly what would need to change (or what should never change) for next time.
What's one thing your supervisor could start, stop, or continue doing to better support you?
Which best describes your current role or level?
- Trainee or student
- Entry-level staff
- Mid-level staff
- Senior staff
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been supervised by your current supervisor?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-11 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for your candor. Your responses will be combined with others to help strengthen how supervision is delivered across the team.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Anchors the AI follow-up interview on the respondent's own overall rating, prompting them to reconstruct one specific recent supervision moment rather than answer in the abstract
- Combines structured measurement (matrix of supervisor behaviors over 3 months, opinion scale on psychological safety, max-diff on what matters most to growth) with open-ended probing for context
- Captures format and tenure context (session frequency, format, time under current supervisor) so results can be segmented by role and relationship length
- Ends with a directed long-text prompt on what the supervisor should start/stop/continue, giving actionable, specific feedback instead of generic satisfaction scores
QuestionPro
Supervisor Evaluation Survey Questions for Feedback + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a supervisor evaluation questionnaire template paired with editorial guidance on writing supervision feedback questions, making it a reasonable direct comparable for this topic. It reads as a static question bank rather than a platform with adaptive follow-up capability. Reporting appears to rely on QuestionPro's standard survey analytics rather than any interview-style reconstruction of specific incidents.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built questionnaire specifically for supervisor/supervision feedback
- Includes sample questions and guidance on structuring a supervision evaluation survey
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution support
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a rating or reconstruct a specific supervision moment
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published prompt methodology
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.