모든 템플릿

Time-of-Use & Dynamic Electricity Pricing Acceptance Survey

Measures residential electricity customers' acceptance of time-of-use (TOU) and dynamic pricing plans, perceived fairness, enrollment intent, and preferred program features. Suitable for utilities and energy researchers designing or evaluating variable-rate programs.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for participating in this study about electricity pricing options. Your responses are completely confidential and will be analyzed only in aggregate to inform energy program design. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. This survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may skip any question or stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

Do you pay or share responsibility for your household's electricity bill?

  • Yes, I pay it myself
  • Yes, I share responsibility
  • No, someone else pays
Q03
의견 척도

How familiar are you with time-of-use (TOU) or dynamic electricity rates?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q04
드롭다운

How long have you been on your current TOU or dynamic pricing plan?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
Q05
의견 척도

If a TOU or dynamic pricing plan were available to you, how likely would you be to enroll in the next 6 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q06
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: TOU or dynamic pricing is a fair way to charge for electricity.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about electricity pricing, fairness, or what would make time-based pricing work better for you.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for your time—your feedback is very valuable and will help shape fairer electricity pricing options. You may now close this window.

Q10
메시지

TOU rates charge different prices at different times of day (e.g., higher during peak hours, lower off-peak). Dynamic rates change more frequently (e.g., daily or hourly) based on electricity grid conditions. Both are designed to reward shifting usage to lower-cost, less congested times.

Q11
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with your TOU or dynamic pricing plan?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q12
순위 매기기

Please rank the following barriers to enrolling in a TOU or dynamic pricing plan from most important to least important.

  1. Unclear or uncertain cost savings
  2. Difficulty shifting usage due to work or family schedule
  3. Worry about bill spikes or financial risk
  4. Lack of smart home technology (e.g., smart thermostat, smart plugs)
  5. Distrust of utility, provider, or program
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q13
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: People who use electricity at off-peak times should pay less than those who use it at peak times.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q14
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

In the past 12 months, did your electricity bill increase noticeably in any month compared to what you expected?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q16
의견 척도

Since enrolling in your current plan, how has the predictability of your electricity bill changed?

척도: 17
최소:Much less predictable최대:Much more predictable
Q17
객관식

Which of the following program features would make you more comfortable trying a TOU or dynamic pricing plan? Select all that apply.

  • Bill protection for the first 3 months
  • Personalized savings estimate before enrolling
  • Alerts before high-price hours
  • Rebates or discounts on smart devices
  • Easy opt-out at any time with no penalty
  • Live support to help plan usage
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: Variable electricity pricing could create hardship for people on fixed incomes or with inflexible schedules.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q19
드롭다운

Which country do you currently live in?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • Other
Q20
객관식

Which best describes your current electricity pricing plan?

  • Flat, fixed per-kWh rate
  • Time-of-use (TOU) pricing
  • Dynamic or real-time pricing
  • Prepay plan
  • Not sure
Q21
의견 척도

How likely are you to opt out of your current TOU or dynamic pricing plan in the next 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q22
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I trust my electricity provider to implement time-based pricing in a way that benefits customers.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
객관식

What is your current housing situation?

  • Own
  • Rent
  • Live with parents or relatives
  • Other
Q24
의견 척도

How acceptable would it be to have up to 10 'critical peak' days per year when electricity prices are approximately double from 4–6 PM, with notice given one day ahead?

척도: 17
최소:Completely unacceptable최대:Completely acceptable
Q25
드롭다운

Including yourself, how many people currently live in your household?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6 or more
Q26
순위 매기기

Please rank the following pricing design goals from most important to least important to you.

  1. Lower average electricity cost
  2. Predictable monthly bills
  3. Simple and transparent pricing structure
  4. Environmental benefits (e.g., less grid strain)
  5. Rewards for shifting usage to off-peak times
  6. Bill protections during extreme weather events
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q27
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Not employed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
객관식

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Rural

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that probes each respondent's own answers for open-ended context on their pricing attitudes, not just a generic open-text box
  • Combines attitudinal opinion-scale items (fairness, trust, predictability, acceptability of critical peak days) with ranking exercises on barriers and pricing-design priorities, giving both quantitative and preference-ranked data
  • Segments respondents by current plan status and tenure (dropdown on how long they've been enrolled) so utilities can compare enrolled vs. not-yet-enrolled customers within one instrument
  • Captures full demographic and housing context (household size, housing situation, area type) needed to model enrollment intent and fairness perceptions across customer segments

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

This is a generic concept/pricing evaluation template rather than one built for electricity rate structures, TOU billing, or utility program design specifically. It's useful as a general pricing-acceptance framework but would need heavy customization to cover critical peak pricing, enrollment barriers, or utility trust dimensions. Best viewed as a category-level pricing template, not a fielding-ready energy survey.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with broad question-library support for pricing research
  • Template is framed around general concept and price-sensitivity testing, which is a reasonable starting structure for willingness-to-pay questions

아쉬운 점

  • No utility- or energy-specific content (no TOU mechanics, critical peak days, or plan-tenure segmentation)
  • Static question-and-answer format with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent finds a rate fair or unfair
  • No published methodology showing how quality scoring or response validation is handled

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.