모든 템플릿

Internal Process Improvement Diagnostic Survey

Diagnoses friction in a specific internal process — where time gets lost, which steps break down, and what to fix first — built for ops leads, IT, or process owners running a targeted improvement review. A trade-off ranking surfaces the top pain point, and the AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example instead of a generic complaint.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us fix this process! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest experience matters more than the 'official' version of how things work. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which process are you evaluating today? (Template note: replace with the specific process names you're studying before launching.)

  • Process A (Replace with your process name)
  • Process B (Replace with your process name)
  • Process C (Replace with your process name)
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how efficient is this process today?

척도: 110
최소:Extremely inefficient최대:Extremely efficient
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with the following statements about this process?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Steps in this process are clearly documented
  • Handoffs between teams or systems are smooth
  • The tools/systems I use support this work well
  • I have the authority to resolve issues without escalating
  • Exceptions or edge cases are handled effectively
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did this process cause a delay, error, or rework you had to fix?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Every time
Q06
점수 배분

Allocate 100 points across these stages based on where the most time gets lost or wasted. (Template note: replace the stage names with the actual steps in your process.)

  • Intake/request submission (Replace with your stage)
  • Review/approval (Replace with your stage)
  • Execution/fulfillment (Replace with your stage)
  • Handoff to another team (Replace with your stage)
  • Quality check/rework (Replace with your stage)
  • Closeout/reporting (Replace with your stage)
100점 배분
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Comparing these pain points, which is the biggest problem and which is the smallest? (Template note: replace with the actual pain points your team has flagged.)

  • Unclear ownership of steps (Replace with your pain point)
  • Manual data entry/re-entry (Replace with your pain point)
  • Slow approvals (Replace with your pain point)
  • Poor visibility into status (Replace with your pain point)
  • Outdated tools or systems (Replace with your pain point)
  • Inconsistent instructions across teams (Replace with your pain point)
  • Too many exceptions/special cases (Replace with your pain point)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Biggest problem최악:Smallest problem
Q08
AI 인터뷰필수

Probe the specific pain point the respondent ranked as the biggest problem: ask for a recent, concrete example — what triggered it, how much time or effort it added, and who else was involved. If their overall efficiency rating was low but the pain point they picked seems minor, reconcile that gap by asking what else is really driving the frustration. Close by asking what a realistic fix would look like and what has stopped that fix from happening already.

Q09
장문형

If you could change exactly one step in this process, what would it be and why?

Q10
객관식

Which department or team are you part of?

  • Operations (Replace with your department)
  • Customer Support (Replace with your department)
  • Engineering/IT (Replace with your department)
  • Finance (Replace with your department)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How long have you been performing this process?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-12 months
  • 1-3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a process review, and the biggest pain points will be prioritized for fixes this quarter.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • A max diff trade-off ranking forces respondents to name their single biggest pain point instead of listing generic complaints, and the AI follow-up interview then digs into a concrete recent example of that exact pain point.
  • A constant-sum allocation (100 points across process stages) pinpoints where time is actually being lost, paired with a frequency question on delays, errors, and rework in the last 30 days for a factual baseline.
  • A matrix of agreement statements and an efficiency rating give quantifiable process-health scores, while an open long-text question captures the one change respondents would prioritize.
  • Responses feed directly into an auto-generated report built for a process review, with per-response quality scoring so ops leads can trust which answers are substantive.

Jotform

Process Improvement Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use static form template on Jotform's builder, easily customizable with their drag-and-drop editor and form logic. It's a fielding-ready survey but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive questioning. Good for quick deployment if you already know exactly what to ask.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template with drag-and-drop customization
  • Benefits from Jotform's broader form logic and integration ecosystem
  • Likely quick to deploy and embed

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses in depth
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No voice interview option or transparent prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Tool And Process Improvement Survey Template

A fielding-ready static survey template covering tool and process improvement broadly, backed by SurveyMonkey's established analytics and benchmarking features. It's a solid generic starting point but not tailored specifically to diagnosing one named internal process end-to-end.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready with SurveyMonkey's analytics dashboard
  • Backed by broad survey benchmarking data
  • Familiar, trusted platform for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into a specific recent example
  • No automated quality scoring per response
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Process Improvement Survey Template

A fielding-ready conversational-style template, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like UI for a more engaging respondent experience. Sample questions are provided but appear to be static, not dynamically generated based on answers. Good for a friendlier feel but not a diagnostic deep-dive tool.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style question flow
  • Fielding-ready with sample questions included
  • Likely mobile-friendly presentation

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational tone is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up
  • No mechanism to surface and then probe a top-ranked pain point
  • No per-response quality scoring or auto-generated diagnostic report

Typeform

Process Improvement Survey Template

A fielding-ready template built on Typeform's well-known one-question-at-a-time design, good for completion rates and polish. It's a static question set with branching logic at best, not a system that interviews respondents about specific examples. Best suited for lightweight pulse checks rather than a targeted diagnostic review.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, high-completion-rate question flow
  • Fielding-ready with Typeform's design strengths
  • Supports basic conditional logic branching

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology since there's no AI involved

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.