Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Property Finder Experience & Priorities Survey
Measures how people search for a home or investment property — what they're trying to find, which features matter most, and how well your search tool delivers — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that made the search frustrating or reassuring, not just a satisfaction number.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
What best describes what you're using (Replace with your property finder tool's name — Template note: this text appears throughout the survey, swap it everywhere before launch) for right now?
- Buying a home
- Renting a home
- Investing in property
- Just browsing or exploring options
- Other
Q03
객관식필수
How far along are you in your property search?
- Just starting to look
- Actively comparing a shortlist
- Made an offer or application
- Finalized a deal or lease
- Paused or gave up searching for now
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
When you're deciding between properties, which of these matter most and least to you?
- Location or neighborhood
- Price or affordability
- Number of bedrooms/bathrooms
- Property size or square footage
- Proximity to work or schools
- Move-in readiness or condition
- Outdoor space or yard
- Parking or garage availability
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most when choosing a property최악:Matters least when choosing a property
Q05
평점 척도필수
How helpful were the search filters (price, location, amenities, etc.) at surfacing properties that actually matched what you wanted?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not helpful at all최대:Extremely helpful
Q06
매트릭스필수
How important is each of the following when you're evaluating a listing?
6개 행 × 5개 열
- Listing photos
- Floor plans
- Virtual tours or video walkthroughs
- Neighborhood information
- Price history or comparable sales
- 외 1개
열: Not important · Somewhat important · Important · Very important · Essential
Q07
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this property search experience to a friend or colleague also looking for a place?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct the single biggest frustration or standout moment from the respondent's property search — what specifically went wrong or right (inaccurate listings, missing details, too many irrelevant results, a fast or slow response from an agent). Anchor on their recommendation score: if 0-6, dig into the exact moment that soured them and what they wish had happened instead; if 9-10, find what specifically won them over. Close by asking what one change would have made their search noticeably faster or more confident.
Q09
객관식
In the last 30 days, how often have you used a property search tool to look for listings?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times total
- This was my first time
Q10
장문형
What's one thing that would have made your property search noticeably easier or faster?
Q11
객관식
Which best describes your current living situation?
- Renting
- Own my home
- Living with family or friends
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
What is your age range?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That's everything — thank you for the detailed answers! We'll use this to improve search filters, listing details, and how quickly you can find the right property.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a single satisfaction rating by using an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment that made the search frustrating or reassuring for that respondent.
- Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force real trade-offs between property features instead of asking people to rate everything as 'important'.
- Combines a matrix of listing-evaluation criteria, a filter-helpfulness rating, and an open-ended 'what would have made this easier' question, then rolls it all into an auto-generated report.
- Segments respondents by tool usage frequency, search stage, living situation, and age so you can see whether frustrations differ by buyer type — without adding survey length, since the AI follow-up only digs deeper when relevant.
Jotform
Property Finder Form TemplateA static form template for collecting buyer/renter property preferences (budget, location, features). It's built for lead capture and requirement-gathering rather than measuring search experience or satisfaction. Easy to customize and embed, but it's a form, not a research instrument.
잘하는 점
- Simple drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's form builder
- Good for capturing structured property requirements from prospects
- Free to start, widely used for lead-gen style forms
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent gets the same fixed field set regardless of answers
- Not designed to measure or score search experience/satisfaction, just to collect preference data
- No automated analysis or generated reporting on responses
SurveySparrow
Property Finder Survey TemplateA conversational survey template aimed at understanding property search preferences and satisfaction. It's a fielding-ready template with SurveySparrow's chat-style UI, but it relies on static branching logic rather than open-ended AI probing of a specific frustrating moment. Reporting is dashboard-based rather than narrative/auto-summarized per response.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-like survey format that feels less like a form
- Pre-built template covering property preferences and general satisfaction
- Supports standard skip/branch logic for basic personalization
아쉬운 점
- No AI-driven follow-up that adaptively probes the specific moment behind a rating
- No per-response quality scoring of open-text answers
- No published, transparent prompt/methodology for how any AI features (if present) generate insights
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.