Media Release And Consent Preferences Survey
Captures how comfortable people are with having their photo, video, or quote used in marketing, training, or press materials — and under what conditions. The AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind any hesitation so legal and marketing teams know exactly what conditions to honor, not just a yes/no checkbox.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Please review the statement below before continuing.
Which types of media are you comfortable being featured in?
- Photos
- Video
- Audio/voice recordings
- Written quotes or testimonials
- None of these
How comfortable are you with your photo, video, or quote appearing in each of the following?
- Company website or blog
- Social media posts
- Printed materials (brochures, signage)
- Internal training materials
- Paid advertising campaigns
How comfortable are you with your full name being shown alongside your photo, video, or quote?
Would you like to review content before it's published?
- Yes, review every use before it's published
- Only for major campaigns or public-facing use
- No, I don't need to review it first
How long should your consent remain valid?
- One-time use only
- One year from today
- Ongoing, until I withdraw consent
- Indefinite, no expiration needed
Are there any specific restrictions on how your photo, video, or quote can be used (for example: not in certain countries, blur my face, don't use my name)? Describe them here.
Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's comfort level and any restrictions they listed. If they marked low comfort or added restrictions, ask what specifically concerns them (context, audience, permanence) and what would need to change for them to feel comfortable. If they chose 'review every use,' clarify what a fast, low-friction review process would look like for them. If any answers about duration or review preference seem to conflict with their stated restrictions, gently surface the conflict and ask them to resolve it.
Please sign below to confirm the consent choices you've made in this survey.
What's your relationship to (Replace with organization name)?
- Employee
- Customer
- Event attendee
- Partner or vendor
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you! Your preferences will be logged and used to guide exactly how and where any media of you gets used. You can update or withdraw your consent at any time by contacting us.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a yes/no checkbox with a matrix question breaking down comfort level by media type and use case (marketing, training, press), plus an opinion scale on being named alongside the image.
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that explores the reasoning behind any hesitation or restriction, so legal and marketing teams know exactly what conditions to honor rather than guessing from a flat form.
- Captures durable consent terms explicitly — how long consent remains valid, whether the person wants pre-publication review rights, and open-ended restrictions on usage — then closes with a signature to confirm the specific choices made.
- Auto-generates a report from structured answers and interview transcript, giving compliance teams a documented, defensible record instead of a static PDF.
Jotform
Consent Of Media Release Form TemplateA ready-to-field static form template for collecting media release consent, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It likely supports e-signature fields and basic conditional logic but captures a fixed set of questions rather than exploring individual reasoning. Good for quick legal sign-off collection at scale, not for nuanced preference-gathering.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template, easy to customize via Jotform's builder
- Likely supports e-signature capture, a core need for consent forms
- Broad integrations typical of Jotform's ecosystem
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive follow-up questioning to understand why someone hesitates or restricts usage
- No per-response quality scoring or automated reporting
- No transparent methodology for how questions are chosen or scored
SurveyMonkey
Social Media Consent Form TemplateA static survey template focused on social media consent, using SurveyMonkey's standard question types. It's suitable for quick baseline consent capture but treats every respondent the same way regardless of their comfort level or concerns. No mechanism to dig deeper into conditional or partial consent.
잘하는 점
- Familiar, fielding-ready survey format
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established analytics and reporting dashboard
- Easy distribution across common channels
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interviewing to surface the 'why' behind restrictions
- No voice AI interview option for respondents who prefer speaking over typing
- No transparent, publishable prompt/methodology behind question logic
SurveySparrow
Free Social Media Photo Release Form TemplateA conversational-style, static template aimed at collecting photo release consent for social/marketing use. SurveySparrow's chat-like UI improves completion experience over traditional forms, but the question set is fixed and doesn't adapt based on answers. Best for simple opt-in/opt-out capture rather than nuanced condition-setting.
잘하는 점
- Conversational UI likely improves completion rates versus flat forms
- Fielding-ready, free template lowers barrier to start
- Marketing-oriented template positioning fits campaign use cases
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive follow-up probing into reasoning behind partial consent or restrictions
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No guided task or screen-share capability for more complex consent walkthroughs
Typeform
Media Release Form TemplateA polished, conversational static form for media release consent, leveraging Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time flow. It's fielding-ready and visually strong, but like other static tools it can't dynamically explore individual concerns or generate a synthesized report on reasoning.
잘하는 점
- Strong conversational UX known for higher completion rates
- Fielding-ready template with Typeform's design polish
- Logic-jump capability for basic branching
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to uncover reasoning behind hesitation
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated compliance report
- No transparent prompt methodology published for how branching decisions are made
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.