Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Grant Application Process Experience Survey
Captures how applicants experienced your grant application process — from finding guidelines to hearing back on a decision — for foundations, government agencies, and grant-making bodies. An AI follow-up interview digs into the exact stage that caused the most friction, so program teams know precisely what to fix before the next funding cycle.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
Have you applied for a grant with us before?
- This was my first time applying
- I've applied 1-2 times before
- I've applied 3 or more times before
Q03
객관식필수
What was the outcome of your most recent application?
- Funded
- Not funded
- Still under review
- Withdrew application
Q04
의견 척도필수
How clear were the eligibility requirements and guidelines before you started your application?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q05
매트릭스필수
Please rate each part of the application process.
5개 행 × 5개 열
- Finding the application guidelines
- Completing the application form
- Gathering required documents and attachments
- Communication during the review period
- Receiving the funding decision
열: Very poor · Poor · Fair · Good · Very good
Q06
객관식필수
How would you describe the amount of time it took to complete the full application?
- Much too long
- Somewhat too long
- About right
- Somewhat too short
- Much too short
Q07
평점 척도필수
Overall, how would you rate your experience with our grant application process?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Identify the single stage of the application process (guidelines, form completion, documentation, review communication, or decision notification) that was most frustrating for this respondent, and reconstruct specifically what went wrong and what they expected instead. If they rated the overall experience highly, probe what almost went wrong or could still be improved. If they were not funded, explore whether the rejection communication was clear enough for them to understand why and what to do differently next time.
Q09
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend applying for funding from us to a peer organization?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
장문형
What's the one change that would most improve the grant application process for future applicants?
Q11
객관식
What type of organization do you represent?
- Nonprofit or charity
- Educational institution
- Government agency
- For-profit business
- Individual applicant
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
What is your organization's annual operating budget?
- Under $100,000
- $100,000–$499,999
- $500,000–$999,999
- $1 million–$4.9 million
- $5 million or more
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
Thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly into improving our grant application process and communications for future applicants.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that digs into whichever stage (guidelines, form completion, review wait, decision communication) actually caused friction for that specific applicant, rather than relying on generic ratings alone
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale on guideline clarity, a matrix rating each process stage, an overall experience rating, and a recommendation likelihood score) with open-ended and adaptive follow-up so program teams get both benchmarkable scores and specific root causes
- Captures applicant context (repeat vs. first-time applicant, application outcome, organization type, and annual operating budget) so friction points can be segmented by applicant profile before the next funding cycle
- Closes with a direct improvement question and a thank-you message, framing the survey as feedback on the applicant experience rather than as another form to fill out
Jotform
Student Grant Application Form TemplateThis is a form for collecting new grant applications (student-focused), not a survey about the applicant's experience with the process. It's a fielding-ready form builder template, useful for intake but not for post-application feedback. Relevant only as a reference point for the grant space, not a direct feedback-survey competitor.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use, customizable form builder with drag-and-drop fields
- Likely supports file uploads and conditional logic common to Jotform templates
- Free tier available for basic form deployment
아쉬운 점
- Designed for collecting applications, not for measuring applicant satisfaction or friction points
- No adaptive follow-up questioning to identify which stage caused problems
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated experience reporting
SurveyMonkey
Grant Application Form TemplatePositioned as a form for intaking grant applications rather than a survey capturing how applicants experienced that process end-to-end. It offers SurveyMonkey's standard static question library and reporting dashboards. Solid for straightforward data collection but not built to probe applicant pain points.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with broad question-type library
- Standard analytics and reporting dashboards
- Easy to deploy without technical setup
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI interview to pinpoint the specific friction stage
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- Reporting is templated analytics, not an automatically generated narrative report tied to individual responses
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.