모든 템플릿

Prototype Usability Debrief Survey

A structured post-session debrief for prototype usability tests, measuring task completion, perceived difficulty, friction points, and improvement priorities to inform iterative design decisions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 28개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this usability session debrief. This short survey (approximately 12 minutes) asks about your experience with the prototype you just tested. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest impressions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the product. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

Have you tested interactive prototypes before today?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
메시지

Now think about the main task you were asked to complete during this session.

Q04
의견 척도

The navigation structure was clear and predictable.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
객관식

Which of the following obstacles, if any, did you encounter during the task? Select all that apply.

  • Couldn't find the right feature
  • Unclear wording or labels
  • Navigation felt inconsistent
  • Buttons or links didn't work
  • Pages loaded slowly
  • Too much visual clutter
  • Form or validation issues
  • No obstacles
  • Other
Q06
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with the prototype experience?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn a bit more about your experience. A short follow-up conversation will ask a couple of questions based on your earlier responses.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for your time—your feedback will directly help us improve this prototype!

Q10
드롭다운

Which device did you primarily use during this session?

  • Desktop or laptop
  • Smartphone
  • Tablet
  • Other
Q11
객관식

Were you able to complete the main task in this session?

  • Completed without issues
  • Completed with minor issues
  • Completed with major issues
  • Partially completed
  • Could not complete
  • Did not attempt
Q12
의견 척도

Labels and instructions were easy to understand.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q13
장문형

If you encountered any friction during the task, please briefly describe the most significant point.

Q14
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend this product to a colleague, based on what you experienced today?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q15
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with the prototype?

Q16
객관식

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
드롭다운

Which browser did you use during this session?

  • Chrome
  • Safari
  • Firefox
  • Edge
  • Other
  • Not sure
Q18
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take you to finish or stop the main task?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • More than 10 minutes
  • Not sure
Q19
의견 척도

The visual design helped me focus on the right actions.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q20
객관식

If you could change one thing about this prototype, what would you change first?

  • Make labels clearer
  • Simplify navigation
  • Improve visibility of the primary action
  • Reduce the number of steps
  • Improve error messages and guidance
  • Increase contrast and visual hierarchy
  • Nothing—it works as is
  • Other
Q21
드롭다운

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

How easy or difficult was the main task to complete?

척도: 17
최소:Very easy최대:Very difficult
Q23
의견 척도

The overall flow of steps felt logical and efficient.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q24
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
드롭다운

How many errors or restarts did you experience during the main task, if any?

  • 0 (none)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4 or more
  • Not sure
Q26
장문형

In one sentence, what did the main flow help you accomplish?

Q27
드롭다운

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
객관식

Did you use any of the following to help you proceed? Select all that apply.

  • No help needed
  • Used on-screen hints or tooltips
  • Retried steps or guessed
  • Sought help from someone
  • Used search
  • Other

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured usability metrics (task completion, time-on-task, error/restart counts, workarounds used) with attitudinal ratings on navigation, labels, visual design, and flow
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that can adaptively probe on friction points and obstacles reported earlier in the survey, rather than relying only on fixed follow-up questions
  • Captures open-text detail on what the main flow helped users accomplish and the single most disruptive friction point, giving qualitative context to the quantitative scores
  • Rounds out the debrief with device/browser context and demographic segmentation (age, gender, region, education, employment) for cross-cutting analysis of usability results

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template

This is a fielding-ready template built around the classic System Usability Scale (SUS), a well-known 10-item standardized instrument. It's a solid choice for teams wanting a validated, benchmarkable usability score, but it is a fixed-question static form rather than a task-specific prototype debrief. It doesn't cover task-level friction detail (device, errors, obstacles) the way a dedicated prototype debrief would.

잘하는 점

  • Based on a widely recognized, standardized usability scale (SUS) with established benchmarking norms
  • Fielding-ready template usable out of the box
  • QuestionPro's platform supports broader survey logic and reporting features

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
  • No per-response automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Website Usability Survey Template

This template targets general website usability feedback rather than a structured post-session prototype test debrief, so it's a comparable but not identical use case. SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style form format is a genuine strength for completion rates. It lacks the task-specific structure (completion, time-on-task, error counts) built into a true usability test debrief.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format designed to improve engagement and completion
  • Fielding-ready template aimed at general website feedback
  • Part of a broader survey platform with omnichannel distribution

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview or voice AI interview option
  • Not structured around discrete task completion, time-on-task, or error tracking specific to prototype testing
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt methodology

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

Another SUS-style template, this one built on Typeform's polished single-question-per-screen interface. It's fielding-ready and easy to distribute, but like other SUS templates it's a fixed set of attitudinal statements rather than a task-by-task usability debrief with completion and friction tracking. It also does not include any live or AI-assisted interview component.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, single-question interface known for higher completion rates on longer surveys
  • Fielding-ready and quick to deploy
  • Based on the standardized SUS methodology

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No structured task completion, time-on-task, or error/restart tracking
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt-level methodology disclosed

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.