모든 템플릿

Parametric Insurance Trust & Payout Confidence Survey

Measures policyholder understanding of parametric triggers and trust in automated payout mechanisms, identifying key trust drivers, barriers, and basis-risk tolerance to inform product design and communication strategies.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! Thank you for participating in this voluntary survey about insurance experiences and preferences. It takes approximately 13 minutes to complete. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are anonymous, will be reported only in aggregate, and no personal identifiers are collected. You may skip any question or stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

Are you currently covered by any personal or business insurance policy?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
객관식

Which of the following types of insurance do you currently hold? Please select all that apply.

  • Auto/vehicle
  • Home/property
  • Renters
  • Health
  • Life
  • Travel
  • Crop/agriculture
  • Business interruption
  • Cyber
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above
Q04
객관식

How familiar are you with parametric insurance triggers?

  • Very familiar
  • Somewhat familiar
  • Slightly familiar
  • Not at all familiar
Q05
객관식

Have you ever received a payout from a parametric insurance policy?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure / Not applicable
Q06
의견 척도

Parametric payouts are based on an index (e.g., wind speed), which may not perfectly match your actual loss. How acceptable is this trade-off to you?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all acceptable최대:Entirely acceptable
Q07
객관식

How would you prefer to receive updates on trigger status and payouts? Please select all that apply.

  • Email
  • SMS / text message
  • Mobile app notifications
  • Web dashboard
  • Phone call from agent or broker
  • In-person meeting
  • Other (please specify)
  • No updates needed
Q08
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, what would help you feel more confident in parametric insurance triggers and payouts? Please share any additional thoughts.

Q09
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

Thank you for participating! Your responses have been recorded and will be used to improve parametric insurance products and communications. You may now close this window.

Q11
메시지

Parametric insurance pays a fixed amount when a predefined, independently measured index (e.g., wind speed, rainfall, earthquake intensity) meets an agreed threshold—without requiring an adjuster to assess individual losses.

Q12
의견 척도

If you have received a parametric payout, how satisfied were you with the speed of the payout?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q13
의견 척도

Imagine a hurricane where wind speeds clearly exceed the trigger threshold. How much would you trust the payout in this scenario?

척도: 17
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q14
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your thoughts on parametric insurance a bit further. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q15
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
객관식

Based on the description above, which statement best describes a parametric trigger?

  • A payout occurs when a measurable index meets a set threshold, regardless of specific loss.
  • A payout occurs only after an adjuster verifies all itemized damages.
  • It is a method for estimating the policy premium each year.
  • Not sure
Q17
의견 척도

If you have received a parametric payout, how satisfied were you with the accuracy of the payout amount relative to your expectations?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q18
의견 척도

Now imagine an earthquake where seismic readings fall just below the trigger threshold, but you still suffered damage. How much would you trust the decision not to pay out?

척도: 17
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q19
드롭다운

In which region do you currently reside?

  • North America
  • Central America & Caribbean
  • South America
  • Western Europe
  • Eastern Europe
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • South Asia
  • East Asia
  • Southeast Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
객관식

Have you ever had an insurance policy that used a parametric trigger?

  • I currently have one
  • I had one in the past
  • Not sure
  • No
Q21
의견 척도

If you have received a parametric payout, how satisfied were you with the clarity of communication throughout the process?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q22
의견 척도

Finally, imagine a drought where the rainfall index says conditions are normal, but local crop damage is evident. How much would you trust the index-based decision?

척도: 17
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q23
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate
  • Professional degree (e.g., JD, MD)
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
의견 척도

How much do you trust that a parametric policy would pay the correct amount when its trigger condition is met?

척도: 17
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q25
객관식

Which of the following best describes your current employment status?

  • Full-time employed
  • Part-time employed
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed
  • Student
  • Retired
  • Homemaker
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
의견 척도

How confident are you that the data sources used to determine parametric triggers (e.g., weather stations, seismic sensors) are accurate and reliable?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Completely confident
Q27
객관식

Do you currently work in the insurance or risk management industry?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
순위 매기기

Please rank the following factors by how important each is to your trust in parametric payouts. Drag to reorder (1 = most important).

  1. Trigger based on objective third-party data
  2. Clear, simple threshold definition
  3. Independent verification or audit
  4. Real-time visibility into the index
  5. Published historical performance
  6. Backed by a reputable reinsurer or insurer
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q29
객관식

Which of the following concerns, if any, might make you hesitate to trust a parametric payout? Please select all that apply.

  • Basis risk (payout doesn't match my actual loss)
  • Data quality or manipulation concerns
  • Thresholds set too high to realistically trigger
  • Lack of transparency in calculations
  • Unclear dispute resolution process
  • Insurer or reinsurer reputation concerns
  • Premium cost relative to coverage
  • Lack of regulatory oversight
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview segment that adaptively probes respondents' reasoning about parametric insurance beyond the fixed-choice questions
  • Uses scenario-based opinion-scale questions (hurricane, earthquake, drought) to directly measure basis-risk tolerance rather than just asking abstractly about trust
  • Combines a ranking question on trust factors with multiple-choice concern/barrier items, giving both prioritized and open-ended signal on what drives or blocks trust
  • Produces an auto-generated report structured around trust drivers, barriers, and basis-risk tolerance, aligned to the stated goal of informing product design and communication

QuestionPro

Product/Service Design Survey Template

This is a generic product/service design survey template, not built for insurance, parametric triggers, or payout trust topics. It could be manually adapted to touch on product design feedback, but none of its stock content addresses trigger comprehension or basis-risk scenarios. It reads as a general-purpose starting point rather than a fielding-ready instrument for this niche.

잘하는 점

  • Part of a broad, established survey template library covering many general research categories
  • Likely offers standard rating and multiple-choice question formats that are quick to deploy
  • Backed by a mature survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • No parametric-insurance-specific content (triggers, indices, basis risk) built in — would require substantial manual authoring
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe individual reasoning behind trust or hesitation
  • No published transparency into question logic or prompt design

SurveySparrow

Product Design Survey Questionnaire

A generic product design questionnaire aimed at general market research, not at insurance policyholders or parametric payout trust. It's a category template rather than something tailored to trigger comprehension, satisfaction with past payouts, or basis-risk scenarios. Useful as a generic base but not a comparable insurance-trust research instrument out of the box.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational-style survey format that may feel friendlier than plain forms
  • Positioned within a library of business templates, making setup fast for generic product feedback
  • Likely supports standard rating scales and multiple-choice question types

아쉬운 점

  • No content addressing parametric triggers, payout accuracy, or basis-risk tolerance
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing
  • No voice AI interview option or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.