QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Clinical Supervision Quality & Effectiveness Survey

Gathers clinicians' honest experience of the clinical supervision they receive — safety to disclose mistakes, usefulness of feedback, and depth of case discussion — for supervisors, training directors, or agencies auditing supervision quality. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what happened in the most recent supervision session instead of relying on general impressions.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your clinical supervision. Your honest answers help improve how supervision is delivered — this takes about 8 minutes and your individual responses are kept confidential.

Q02
객관식필수

In what format do you primarily receive clinical supervision?

  • One-on-one (individual)
  • Group supervision
  • Peer consultation
  • A mix of formats
Q03
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how many supervision sessions have you attended?

  • None
  • 1
  • 2-3
  • 4-6
  • More than 6
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate the quality of the clinical supervision you've received in the last month?

척도: 1 – 10
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q05
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your current supervisor?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • I feel safe disclosing mistakes or uncertainty without fear of judgment
  • Feedback I receive is specific enough to change how I practice
  • Sessions include enough time discussing actual client cases (not just administrative matters)
  • My supervisor helps me develop clinical skills, not just manage caseloads
  • Cultural, ethical, or diversity considerations are meaningfully addressed when relevant
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
평점 척도필수

How clear and actionable is the feedback you typically receive after a case discussion?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Vague, hard to apply최대:Crystal clear, immediately usable
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of the following would most improve your clinical supervision, and which matters least right now?

  • More time discussing specific client cases
  • More concrete, skill-focused feedback
  • More emotional/personal support around burnout
  • More guidance on ethical or risk situations
  • More attention to cultural and diversity issues
  • More flexibility in scheduling sessions
  • Better balance between clinical and administrative topics
  • More opportunities for peer or group input
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would improve supervision most최악:Matters least right now
Q08
의견 척도필수

How comfortable do you feel raising a case where you're unsure you handled something correctly?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very uncomfortable최대:Completely comfortable
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the respondent's most recent supervision session in detail: what case or issue they brought, what feedback the supervisor gave, and whether it changed how they handled the client afterward. If they rated psychological safety or feedback clarity low, probe specifically what happened that made them hesitant or what feedback felt too vague, and what they wish had been said instead.

Q10
장문형

Is there anything about your supervision experience that the questions above didn't capture?

Q11
객관식

What is your primary clinical discipline?

  • Psychology
  • Counseling/Marriage & Family Therapy
  • Social Work
  • Nursing
  • Psychiatry
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How many years have you been practicing in your field?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

What is your primary practice setting?

  • Community mental health
  • Private practice
  • Hospital/inpatient
  • School or university
  • Government/correctional
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for sharing your experience. Responses will be aggregated into a report used to strengthen supervision practices — no individual answers will be shared with your supervisor.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's most recent supervision session in detail, rather than relying on generic recall questions
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scales, a matrix on supervisor behaviors, a rating on feedback clarity, and a max-diff on improvement priorities) with open-ended reflection
  • Asks directly about psychological safety to disclose mistakes and comfort raising uncertain cases, which is central to supervision quality auditing
  • Captures discipline, experience level, and practice setting so training directors can segment results by clinician subgroup

Jotform

Clinical Supervision Form Template

This is a customizable form-builder template, more oriented toward administrative documentation of supervision sessions than a research-grade survey instrument. It offers drag-and-drop editing and integrations typical of Jotform's form suite, but it does not appear structured around measuring supervision quality or clinician disclosure comfort specifically.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform forms
  • Can integrate with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, e-signatures)
  • Quick to deploy for basic session logging

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questioning to reconstruct session details
  • No mention of automated quality scoring or per-response analysis
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology since it is not an AI-driven tool

QuestionPro

Clinical Supervision Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This page reads as a sample-questions/guide resource showcasing example clinical supervision survey items rather than a ready-to-field template with a defined flow. It's useful for question inspiration but requires manual assembly into an actual fielded survey. QuestionPro's platform supports standard survey logic, but this page doesn't indicate any adaptive interview capability.

잘하는 점

  • Provides sample question wording clinicians and researchers can reference
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform with standard branching logic
  • Likely covers common supervision topics for quick question-bank reuse

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a question list/guide rather than a fielding-ready survey flow
  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct a specific recent session
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated audit reports mentioned

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기