Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Teacher Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey
Measures how engaged, supported, and likely to stay teachers feel — covering workload, recognition, resources, and leadership support — for school and district leaders tracking staff morale. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind each teacher's engagement score and their top priority for improvement, surfacing detail no rating scale alone can capture.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q02
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this school as a place to work to another educator?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q03
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience at school?
6개 행 × 5개 열
- I feel recognized for the work I do
- My workload is manageable
- I have the materials and resources I need to teach effectively
- My input is considered in decisions that affect my classroom
- I have real opportunities to grow professionally here
- 외 1개
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
객관식필수
In the last 30 days, how often did you feel emotionally exhausted by your work by the end of the school day?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Every day
Q05
객관식
In the last 30 days, how often did a supervisor or school leader acknowledge or recognize your work?
- Never
- Once
- A few times
- Weekly or more
Q06
평점 척도필수
How supported do you feel by school leadership when you raise a classroom or workload concern?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very unsupported최대:Very supported
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these would do the most — and least — to improve your engagement at work?
- Higher pay or stipends
- Smaller class sizes
- More protected planning time
- More recognition from leadership
- Better classroom resources and materials
- More say in school decisions
- More relevant professional development
- Less administrative paperwork
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would improve my engagement the most최악:Would improve my engagement the least
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Anchor on the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their top-ranked engagement driver from the trade-off question. Probe the specific incident or pattern behind that score — what's a recent moment that made them feel valued or unsupported — and ask what one change from their top driver would concretely look like in their day-to-day role. If their score is high, ask what would put it at risk; if their score is low, ask what it would take to move it up even two points.
Q09
객관식필수
How likely are you to still be teaching at this school one year from now?
- Definitely not
- Probably not
- Not sure yet
- Probably yes
- Definitely yes
Q10
메시지
A few quick questions about your role — these help us compare results across grade levels and experience, and are completely optional.
Q11
객관식
Which best describes your role?
- Classroom teacher
- Instructional support / paraprofessional
- Specialist (e.g., counselor, librarian, coach)
- Other
Q12
객관식
How many years have you worked in education?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-7 years
- 8-15 years
- 16+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식
What grade level(s) do you primarily work with?
- Elementary
- Middle school
- High school
- Multiple levels / district-wide
- Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지
That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your answers feed directly into a report school leadership will use to address workload, recognition, and support this year.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Pairs quantitative measures (recommend-to-work likelihood, agreement matrix, burnout and recognition frequency, leadership support rating, one-year retention intent) with an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each teacher's own likelihood-to-recommend score and top-ranked priority to dig into the specific 'why' behind it
- Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force-rank which improvements would most and least move engagement, giving leaders a prioritized action list rather than just averages
- Collects role, years in education, and grade level so results can be compared across cohorts, all wrapped in a conversational chat-style flow with clear opening and closing messages
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean district and school leaders get a synthesized summary instead of raw spreadsheet exports
Jotform
Teacher Engagement Survey Form TemplateA fielding-ready static form template covering core teacher engagement topics, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and embed but relies entirely on fixed questions with no adaptive probing. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the reasoning behind scores.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template usable immediately
- Flexible form builder for adding/removing questions and branding
- Familiar, low-friction form format for respondents
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the 'why' behind each score
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesis
- No voice interview option for richer qualitative capture
QuestionPro
Teacher Engagement Survey Template + Sample Questionnaire TemplateAn enterprise survey platform's teacher engagement template with sample questions and presumably strong analytics/dashboarding for large districts. It's a static questionnaire template rather than an interactive interview, so depth comes from fixed question design rather than dynamic probing. Likely well-suited to organizations already on QuestionPro's broader research suite.
잘하는 점
- Backed by an established enterprise survey/research platform
- Sample questionnaire gives a ready starting structure
- Likely strong reporting/dashboard tooling for large-scale rollouts
아쉬운 점
- Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore individual reasons behind scores
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No transparent, inspectable AI prompts since there's no AI interview layer
SurveySparrow
Teacher Engagement Survey TemplateA conversational-style survey template purpose-built for teacher engagement, which aligns well with QuestionPunk's chat-based format. It likely offers a pleasant respondent experience but remains a fixed-question flow rather than a true adaptive interview. No indication of AI-driven follow-up or automated qualitative analysis.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-like survey UI improves completion experience
- Template specifically designed for teacher engagement, not generic HR use
- Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting features
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview that follows up on individual responses
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended answers
- No auto-generated synthesis report or voice interview option
SurveyMonkey
Employee Engagement Survey TemplateA general employee engagement template from a widely used survey platform, not specifically written for K-12 teachers or school leadership contexts. It would need adaptation (workload, recognition, classroom-specific language) to fit a teacher retention use case. Strong for broad benchmarking but generic rather than education-tailored.
잘하는 점
- Backed by a well-known, broadly trusted survey platform
- Likely offers benchmarking data across many industries
- Simple to deploy and customize for general engagement tracking
아쉬운 점
- Not education-specific — lacks teacher/classroom-specific workload and leadership-support framing
- Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up interview
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report tailored to school retention
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.