모든 템플릿

Parent-School Communication Effectiveness Survey

Measures how well a school's contact with parents actually works — which channels get used, how quickly urgent matters get followed up, and whether messages get read at all. The AI follow-up reconstructs one specific recent contact experience in detail, surfacing breakdowns that satisfaction scores alone would miss.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us improve how the school communicates with parents! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please think about the last few weeks. This should take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, which of these has your child's school used to contact you?

  • Phone call
  • Text message
  • Email
  • School app or online portal notification
  • Paper note sent home with my child
  • In-person conversation (pickup, event, etc.)
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with how often the school communicates with you?

척도: 17
최소:Not satisfied at all최대:Extremely satisfied
Q04
슬라이더 매트릭스

How effective is each of these methods for getting information to you that you actually understand and act on?

5개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • Phone calls from school staff
  • Text messages
  • Emails
  • School app or portal notifications
  • Paper notices sent home
슬라이더 0–10최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q05
객관식

When the school has needed to reach you about something urgent (illness, an incident, a behavior concern), how quickly did they typically follow up with more information or next steps?

  • Same day
  • Within 24 hours
  • Within a few days
  • Longer than a week
  • This hasn't come up for us
Q06
순위 매기기

Rank these contact methods from most to least preferred for the school to use with you going forward.

  1. Phone call
  2. Text message
  3. Email
  4. School app or portal notification
  5. In-person conversation
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, about what share of the school's messages to you did you actually read within a day of receiving them?

  • All of them
  • Most of them
  • About half
  • Only a few
  • None of them
Q08
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the school's overall communication with you this school year?

범위: 15
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Ask the parent to walk through the most recent specific instance of the school contacting them — what the message was about, which channel it came through, whether it reached them in time to act, and how they responded or wished they could have responded. Anchor on concrete details (what the message said, when they saw it, what they did next) rather than general impressions. If they rated overall communication low or said messages went unread, probe exactly where the breakdown happened — the channel, the timing, the clarity of the message, or something else — and what a better version of that contact would have looked like.

Q10
객관식

What grade is your child currently in?

  • Pre-K / Kindergarten
  • Grades 1-5
  • Grades 6-8
  • Grades 9-12
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

Thank you for sharing this — it's a big help! Your responses will be combined with other parents' feedback to improve how and when the school reaches out to families.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a simple satisfaction score by having the AI follow-up interview ask the parent to walk through one specific recent contact experience in detail, surfacing breakdowns generic ratings would miss.
  • Separately measures which channels were actually used in the last 30 days, how effective each channel is (via a slider matrix), and how urgent matters specifically were handled — not just overall sentiment.
  • Includes a ranking question for channel preference plus read-rate and satisfaction/rating questions, giving schools both quantitative benchmarks and a qualitative narrative in one flow.
  • Every response is automatically quality-scored and rolled into an auto-generated report, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked and why.

Jotform

Student Contact Information and Parent Contact Form Template

This is a data-collection form for gathering student and parent contact details, not a survey for evaluating how well school communication actually works. It's a fielding-ready template, but for a different purpose than measuring communication effectiveness. Useful for updating records, not for diagnosing channel breakdowns or urgent-contact response gaps.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
  • Likely integrates with school databases and other apps
  • Free tier available for basic use

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up to probe a specific communication incident
  • No mechanism to measure urgency-specific response time or channel effectiveness
  • No automated quality scoring or narrative report generation

SurveyMonkey

Parent Contact Form Template

SurveyMonkey's template is also framed as a contact-information form rather than an effectiveness survey, so it overlaps with QuestionPunk's topic area but not its purpose. It's ready to field on a mature survey platform, but it won't tell a school how urgent matters were handled or which channels parents actually read.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by an established survey platform with reporting dashboards
  • Simple to deploy and share via link or email
  • Familiar interface for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI probing into a specific recent communication experience
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
  • Not designed to measure channel-by-channel effectiveness or urgent-contact follow-up

Typeform

Free Parental Contact Form Template

Another contact-information template rather than a communication-effectiveness survey; it captures parent details in Typeform's conversational style but doesn't probe how communication is actually experienced. It's a polished, ready-to-use form, just aimed at a different job than diagnosing school-parent communication gaps.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, mobile-friendly conversational interface
  • Easy to customize branding and question flow
  • Quick to deploy for basic data capture

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up or voice interview option to reconstruct a specific incident
  • No automated scoring of response quality or auto-generated analysis report
  • Not built to compare channel effectiveness or urgent-matter response times

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.