모든 템플릿

Workplace Diversity and Inclusion Climate Survey

Measures how included, respected, and fairly treated employees feel across belonging, fairness, and access to opportunity, plus whether they've witnessed or experienced exclusionary behavior. Built for HR and DEI teams benchmarking climate over time. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment behind a respondent's inclusion score instead of leaving it as just a number.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience at work. This helps us understand where inclusion is working and where it isn't — your answers are anonymous and there are no right answers. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how included do you feel at your organization?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all included최대:Extremely included
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • I can bring my authentic self to work without fear of judgment
  • My manager treats people fairly regardless of their background
  • I have the same access to growth and advancement opportunities as my peers
  • Leaders here are held accountable for building an inclusive culture
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, have you personally experienced or witnessed behavior at work that made someone feel excluded or unfairly treated?

  • Yes, I personally experienced it
  • Yes, I witnessed it happen to someone else
  • Yes, both
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q05
객관식

Which of the following have you personally used or benefited from in the last year?

  • Mentorship or sponsorship program
  • Employee resource group (ERG) or affinity network
  • Flexible work arrangements
  • Manager check-ins focused on inclusion
  • Bias-awareness or inclusion training
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these initiatives do you think would do the most, and the least, to improve inclusion at your organization?

  • Pay equity transparency
  • Manager training on unconscious bias
  • Flexible work and accommodation policies
  • Employee resource groups and affinity networks
  • Diverse interview panels for hiring
  • Mentorship and sponsorship programs
  • Clear, published criteria for promotion
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most improve inclusion최악:Least improve inclusion
Q07
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that reporting a concern about unfair treatment or exclusion would be taken seriously here?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific experience behind the respondent's inclusion score: ask for a concrete recent moment (positive or negative) that shaped how included they feel, who was involved, and what happened. If they said they experienced or witnessed exclusionary behavior, probe what occurred, whether it was addressed, and by whom. If their confidence in reporting concerns was low, ask what would need to change for them to trust the process. If they decline to share specifics, ask instead what one change would most improve how included they feel.

Q09
메시지

Just a few optional questions about you — these help us see whether experiences differ across groups so we can act on real gaps, not averages.

Q10
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How do you describe your race or ethnicity? Select all that apply.

  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino/a/x
  • Middle Eastern or North African
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
  • White
  • Two or more races
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How long have you worked at your organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for your honesty. Responses are combined into an anonymized report the DEI and leadership teams use to prioritize concrete changes, not to identify individuals.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single inclusion score with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment behind a respondent's rating, not just a number on a scale
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scale, matrix, max-diff on initiative priorities) with open-ended probing, so HR/DEI teams get both trend data and the 'why' behind it
  • Includes a confidence-in-reporting question and an experienced/witnessed exclusion item, giving a fuller climate picture than belonging alone
  • Transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring mean DEI teams can audit how the AI is interviewing respondents and trust the auto-generated report

QuestionPro

Diversity and Inclusion Survey Questionnaire

A fielding-ready questionnaire template from an established enterprise survey platform, covering standard D&I question areas. It's a fixed question set rather than an adaptive interview, so all respondents get the same static items regardless of their answers. Good for teams wanting a straightforward, customizable questionnaire without conversational AI.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a mature, enterprise-grade survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Likely offers standard analytics/dashboards for benchmarking over time
  • Easy to customize as a static questionnaire

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the specific experience behind a low inclusion score
  • No voice AI interview option mentioned
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored for quality

Jotform

Questionnaire for Equity & Managing Diversity at workplace Form Template

A form-builder template focused on equity and diversity management questions, well-suited for quick deployment via Jotform's drag-and-drop editor. It's a static form rather than a guided interview, so it collects answers without follow-up probing. Best for teams that just need a simple, editable intake form.

잘하는 점

  • Simple drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform
  • Fast to deploy for basic data collection
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (e.g., payment/logic add-ons)

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI interview or voice option
  • No mechanism to reconstruct the story behind a respondent's rating
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

SurveySparrow

Workplace Diversity Questionnaire Template

SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style survey format makes this diversity questionnaire feel more engaging than a plain form, one question at a time. However, the conversational flow is still pre-scripted rather than AI-adaptive, so it can't generate follow-up questions based on an individual's specific answer. Suitable for teams wanting a friendlier UI without AI-driven probing.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, one-at-a-time UI likely improves completion rates
  • Template covers standard workplace diversity question areas
  • Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting tools

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive — no AI-generated follow-up based on a respondent's specific answer
  • No voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology or per-response quality scoring

Typeform

Diversity and Inclusion Survey Template

Typeform's template offers its signature clean, one-question-at-a-time design, which tends to feel more personal than a dense form. It remains a fixed set of questions, however, with branching logic at most, not true AI-generated follow-ups tailored to each response. A solid choice for a polished static survey, less suited if the goal is to capture the specific story behind each score.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, well-known one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Easy embedding and sharing, popular with HR teams
  • Supports basic logic jumps for some personalization

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct the moment behind an inclusion score
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt documentation

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.