모든 템플릿

Urban Congestion Pricing: Driver Attitudes & Willingness-to-Pay Survey

Measures driver support, perceived fairness, willingness to pay, and revenue allocation preferences for congestion pricing. Designed for city agencies and transportation policy researchers studying public acceptance before or after zone implementation.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this survey on urban transportation and traffic management. This survey is being conducted to understand how drivers and residents feel about different approaches to managing traffic congestion. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The results will be used to inform transportation policy discussions. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. By proceeding, you indicate your consent to participate.

Q02
객관식

How often do you drive in or through your city's central area?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • Weekly
  • A few times per month
  • Rarely (less than monthly)
  • I do not currently drive
Q03
객관식

How familiar are you with the concept of congestion pricing?

  • Very familiar
  • Somewhat familiar
  • I've heard of it but don't know details
  • Not at all familiar
Q04
객관식

In the past 30 days, did you drive into the area that would be (or is) covered by the congestion pricing zone?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q05
의견 척도

Overall, to what extent do you support or oppose implementing a congestion charge in your city?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q06
드롭다운

What is the highest daily charge you would consider acceptable to enter the zone during peak hours?

  • No charge is acceptable ($0)
  • $1–$3
  • $4–$6
  • $7–$9
  • $10–$14
  • $15–$19
  • $20 or more
Q07
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your views a bit more. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions about your thoughts on congestion pricing.

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses have been recorded and will be used in aggregate to inform congestion pricing policy discussions. Your individual answers will remain confidential. If you have questions about this research, please contact the study team.

Q10
객관식

Which best describes the area where you do most of your driving?

  • City center / urban core
  • Inner suburbs
  • Outer suburbs / exurban
  • Small town / rural
  • Mix of areas
Q11
메시지

<p>Before we ask your opinions, here is a brief description:</p><p><strong>Congestion pricing</strong> is a policy where drivers pay a fee to enter a designated zone in a city's central area during certain hours. The goals are to reduce traffic congestion, improve air quality, and generate revenue that can be reinvested in transportation. Fees may vary by time of day, and exemptions or discounts may be offered for certain groups.</p><p>Examples of cities with congestion pricing include London, Stockholm, and Singapore. Some cities are currently exploring or implementing similar programs.</p><p>Please keep this description in mind as you answer the following questions.</p>

Q12
드롭다운

Approximately how many times did you drive into the congestion zone in the past 30 days?

  • 1–2 times
  • 3–5 times
  • 6–10 times
  • 11–20 times
  • More than 20 times
Q13
의견 척도

How likely would you be to change your driving behavior (e.g., drive less, shift times) in response to a congestion charge?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q14
순위 매기기

Please rank the following uses of congestion pricing revenue from most to least important to you.

  1. Improve public transit service
  2. Reduce public transit fares
  3. Road and bridge maintenance
  4. Pedestrian and cycling infrastructure
  5. Traffic safety programs
  6. Neighborhood air and noise mitigation near the zone
  7. General city budget
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q15
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you think city leaders should consider about congestion pricing?

Q16
객관식

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
객관식

What are your usual reasons for traveling into the central area? Select all that apply.

  • Work / commute
  • Errands / shopping
  • Appointments (e.g., medical, government)
  • Leisure / entertainment
  • Transporting others (e.g., family, carpool)
  • Business / deliveries
  • Pass-through (not stopping in the area)
  • Other
Q18
객관식

When do you most often drive into the zone?

  • Morning (6–10 am)
  • Midday (10 am–3 pm)
  • Afternoon/evening (3–7 pm)
  • Night (7 pm–6 am)
Q19
의견 척도

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be overall?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q20
순위 매기기

Rank the following policy design features from most to least important to you.

  1. Low-income discounts
  2. Off-peak discounts
  3. Daily price cap
  4. Resident discounts
  5. Transparent public reporting of how revenue is spent
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q21
객관식

Do you currently hold a valid driver's license?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
객관식

When you chose not to drive into the zone, what did you do instead? Select all that apply.

  • Took an alternate route around the zone
  • Traveled at a different time
  • Used public transit
  • Delayed the trip to another day
  • Did not make the trip at all
  • Used ride-hail or taxi
  • Walked or cycled
  • Other
Q23
의견 척도

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be for low-income drivers?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q24
객관식

Do you have regular access to a car or light truck?

  • Yes, always
  • Sometimes
  • No
Q25
의견 척도

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be for small business owners who rely on vehicle deliveries?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q26
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
의견 척도

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be for people who commute into the city for work?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q28
드롭다운

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker / caregiver
  • Retired
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Not seeking paid work
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
드롭다운

What is your total annual household income before taxes?

  • Under 25,000
  • 25,000–49,999
  • 50,000–74,999
  • 75,000–99,999
  • 100,000–149,999
  • 150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated fairness battery breaking down perceived equity for low-income drivers, small business owners, and commuters specifically — not just overall support/opposition
  • Captures actual recent driving behavior (frequency, timing, trip purpose, and alternatives chosen) alongside attitudinal measures, giving city agencies behavioral context for stated preferences
  • Uses ranking questions to force trade-offs on revenue allocation priorities and policy design features, rather than relying on flat multiple-choice preference questions
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended reasoning behind support/opposition, plus an open-text question for policy recommendations — generating richer qualitative input than a static form

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

This is a generic concept/pricing evaluation template rather than one built for congestion pricing or transportation policy specifically. It could be adapted with manual edits for willingness-to-pay questions, but lacks the driving-behavior, fairness, and revenue-allocation framing built into a congestion pricing study. Best suited as a general-purpose pricing research starting point, not a fielding-ready policy acceptance survey.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with broad question-type library for pricing/concept research
  • Template presumably covers standard price-sensitivity question formats (e.g., willingness-to-pay ranges)

아쉬운 점

  • No congestion-pricing-specific content (zone definitions, driving behavior, revenue allocation) evident from the page
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe reasoning behind pricing attitudes
  • No transparent, publishable prompt/methodology documentation for qualitative components

SurveySparrow

Product Pricing Survey Template

This template targets product pricing and price sensitivity research for commercial goods/services, not transportation policy or driver attitudes. It may offer reusable willingness-to-pay question logic, but has no built-in content on driving behavior, congestion zones, or fairness perceptions for policy contexts. Would require substantial rebuilding to serve as a congestion pricing acceptance study.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for price sensitivity/willingness-to-pay research in a consumer product context
  • Likely offers conversational, mobile-friendly survey formatting typical of SurveySparrow's editor

아쉬운 점

  • No transportation, congestion zone, or policy-specific question content evident
  • Fixed-form format without adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing on respondent reasoning
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated report generation described for this template

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.