Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey
Measures employee perceptions of phishing simulation realism, behavioral responses, confidence changes, and training preferences to help security teams optimize their awareness programs.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Have you ever received a phishing simulation email from this employer?
- Yes, at this employer
- Yes, but only at a previous employer
- No, never
- Not sure
Overall, how realistic did the most recent phishing simulation feel?
Before your most recent simulation, how confident were you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?
Please rank the following training formats from most helpful to least helpful.
- Interactive phishing simulations
- Short videos (≤3 minutes)
- Live workshops or webinars
- Job aid or one-page checklist
- Email tips or newsletters
- Microlearning modules (5–10 minutes)
Based on your responses in this survey, what suggestions do you have for improving future phishing simulations or related security training? Please share any specifics.
On a typical workday, approximately how many emails do you handle?
- 0–24
- 25–74
- 75–149
- 150+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for participating! Your feedback will directly help us make phishing simulations and security training more relevant and effective.
When was the most recent phishing simulation you recall receiving from this employer?
- Within the last 7 days
- 2–4 weeks ago
- 1–3 months ago
- More than 3 months ago
- I don't recall
- Not applicable—I haven't received one here
Which aspects of the simulation felt realistic? Select all that apply.
- Sender name and email address
- Subject line
- Email body content and tone
- Visual design and branding
- Call-to-action (link or attachment)
- Timing of delivery
- None of the above
Today, how confident are you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?
How frequently would you prefer to receive phishing simulations?
- Twice per month
- Monthly
- Every 2 months
- Quarterly
- Twice per year
- Once per year
Which of the following best describes your primary job function?
- Engineering/IT
- Operations
- Sales
- Customer Support
- Human Resources
- Finance
- Legal
- Marketing/Communications
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thinking about your most recent simulation from this employer, what did you do? Select all that apply.
- Reported it using the reporting tool/process
- Deleted it without interacting
- Clicked a link or opened an attachment
- Replied to the message
- Ignored it and took no action
- Asked a colleague or IT for advice
- Marked it as spam/junk
- I don't recall
How difficult was it to identify the most recent simulation as a phishing attempt?
What, if anything, did you learn or reinforce from the simulation(s)? Select all that apply.
- How to use the report button or process
- How to inspect URLs safely
- Common red flags to watch for
- How to verify sender identity
- To pause and validate urgent requests
- Where to find internal guidance/resources
- Nothing new to me
How long have you worked at this organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Which cues, if any, did you notice in the simulation? Select all that apply.
- Suspicious sender or domain
- Generic greeting or unusual salutation
- Spelling or grammar errors
- Urgent or threatening language
- Unexpected attachment
- Mismatched or odd-looking URL
- Unusual request for sensitive data
- Off-brand visuals or layout
- Timing felt unusual (e.g., outside business hours)
- I did not notice any specific cues
In the next 30 days, how likely are you to change any of your email habits based on these simulations (e.g., reporting suspicious messages faster, inspecting links more carefully)?
In which region are you primarily based?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes respondents on their own suggestions for improving the phishing program, rather than stopping at closed-ended ratings
- Combines opinion-scale confidence tracking (before vs. today) with multiple-choice behavioral recall questions, so you can measure both perceived and self-reported behavior change from the same simulation event
- Uses ranking and preference questions (training format ranking, frequency preference) to directly inform program redesign, not just measure satisfaction
- Ends with auto-generated reporting and transparent prompts, so security teams can see exactly what was asked in the AI portion and trust the resulting summary
SurveySparrow
Post Training Survey Template | Feedback From EmployeesThis is a general post-training feedback template, not specific to phishing or security awareness, so questions would need heavy customization to fit a phishing simulation use case. It's a ready-to-field form with SurveySparrow's conversational-style UI. There's no built-in mechanism for adaptive probing into why someone clicked or reported a simulated email.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-like survey format that can feel less clinical than a standard form
- Purpose-built for employee training feedback, so core structure (satisfaction, relevance, usefulness) transfers reasonably well
아쉬운 점
- Not phishing-specific out of the box, requiring manual rebuilding of simulation-related questions
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
QuestionPro
Training Effectiveness Survey Questions | Post-Training Evaluation Sample TemplateThis template targets general training effectiveness evaluation (e.g., Kirkpatrick-style questions) rather than phishing simulations specifically. It's a fielding-ready template within a full-featured survey platform, useful as a starting point but not tailored to security awareness behaviors or cues. Teams would need to add phishing-specific items themselves.
잘하는 점
- Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with broad question-type support and analytics
- Structured around established training-evaluation frameworks, useful for benchmarking general learning outcomes
아쉬운 점
- No phishing simulation-specific content (realism, cues noticed, click/report behavior)
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI interview option — follow-up questions are static and pre-written
- No transparent, per-question AI prompt disclosure or automated quality scoring of open responses
SurveyMonkey
Security Awareness Survey TemplateThis is the most directly comparable template, covering general security awareness rather than phishing simulation specifics like realism, cues noticed, or confidence shift after a simulation. It's a ready-to-use static form backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and reporting tools. It would need supplementing to capture pre/post confidence and training-format preferences in the depth QuestionPunk's template does.
잘하는 점
- Well-known, easy-to-deploy platform with strong distribution and basic reporting/dashboards
- Covers broad security awareness topics that overlap with phishing training programs
아쉬운 점
- Focused on general security awareness, not simulation-specific realism, cues, or behavioral recall
- Fixed-question static form with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
- No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.