Forced-Choice Agreement Survey (No Neutral Option)

Measures agreement with a set of statements using an even-numbered rating scale that removes the neutral midpoint, forcing respondents to lean agree or disagree rather than sit on the fence. Built for HR, product, and policy teams who want to reduce central-tendency bias in attitude research. The AI follow-up digs into the concrete reason behind each respondent's strongest lean and what would change their mind.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for sharing your honest reactions to a few statements below. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There's no middle 'neutral' option this time — we'd rather know which way you lean, even slightly. About 7 minutes.

Q02

객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did you interact with (replace with the product, policy, or team being evaluated)?

Not at all
A few times
Weekly
Almost daily

Q03

매트릭스필수

For each statement, choose the response that comes closest to how you feel. There is no middle option — pick the side you lean toward.

4개 행 × 4개 열

(Replace with Statement 1 — e.g., 'This policy is clearly communicated')
(Replace with Statement 2 — e.g., 'This policy is applied fairly')
(Replace with Statement 3 — e.g., 'This policy makes my day-to-day work easier')
(Replace with Statement 4 — e.g., 'I would recommend keeping this policy as-is')

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Agree · Strongly agree

Q04

객관식

Which one of those statements did you feel most strongly about, in either direction?

(Replace with Statement 1)
(Replace with Statement 2)
(Replace with Statement 3)
(Replace with Statement 4)

Q05

평점 척도필수

Overall, how strongly do you agree that (replace with the topic, e.g., 'the current policy') is working well?

범위: 1 – 6

최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

Q06

순위 매기기

Rank these statements from the one that matters most to you personally to the one that matters least.

(Replace with Statement 1)
(Replace with Statement 2)
(Replace with Statement 3)
(Replace with Statement 4)

드래그하여 순위 지정

Q07

AI 인터뷰

Identify which statement the respondent leaned most strongly toward, agree or disagree, and reconstruct the concrete reason behind that lean — a specific incident, comparison, or outcome, not a general attitude. If they strongly disagreed with any statement, ask what specific, realistic change would move them to agree. If every lean was mild, probe which single change would most increase their overall agreement.

Q08

장문형

Anything about (replace with the topic) that these statements didn't capture?

Q09

객관식

Which team or department are you part of?

(Replace with Department A)
(Replace with Department B)
(Replace with Department C)
Prefer not to say

Q10

객관식

How long have you been in your current role?

Less than 6 months
6 months to 2 years
2 to 5 years
More than 5 years
Prefer not to say

Q11

메시지

That's everything — thank you for being direct with us! Your responses feed into a report on where opinion is genuinely split versus where most people lean the same way.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Uses an even-numbered agreement scale with no neutral midpoint, built specifically to reduce central-tendency bias rather than being a generic Likert template
After the matrix, an AI follow-up interview asks the respondent to explain the concrete reason behind their strongest lean and what would change their mind
Includes a ranking question to surface which statement matters most personally, plus role/tenure questions for segmenting HR, product, or policy feedback
Ends with an auto-generated report pulling together the rating, ranking, and open-ended reasoning instead of leaving analysis to the researcher

QuestionPro

Even Likert Scale Survey Questions Template

This is the closest conceptual match, offering a template built around the even-point (forced-choice) Likert scale to avoid neutral responses. It's a static question set aimed at general attitude research rather than a specific HR/product/policy workflow. No adaptive follow-up is mentioned, so any 'why' behind a respondent's answer isn't captured within the tool.

잘하는 점

Purpose-built around the even-scale/no-neutral-option concept, matching the core methodology
Backed by a large, established survey platform with broad question-type support
Likely customizable in wording and number of scale points

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a strong lean
No mention of automated per-response quality scoring
No transparent, published prompt methodology for how any AI features (if present) operate

SurveyMonkey

Likert Scale Survey Template

A general Likert scale template from a mainstream survey platform, useful as a starting point for attitude measurement but not specifically framed around removing the neutral midpoint. It's a standard fielding-ready template rather than one engineered for central-tendency bias reduction or department-specific attitude research.

잘하는 점

Widely recognized, easy-to-deploy template on a mature survey platform
Likely supports standard Likert scale customization (labels, number of points)
Good baseline choice for teams already using SurveyMonkey for other research

아쉬운 점

No indication it defaults to an even-point, forced-choice scale — neutral option likely included by default
No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to explore respondent reasoning
No automated quality scoring or transparent AI prompt documentation

SurveySparrow

Free Likert Scale Questionnaire Template

A free, general-purpose Likert scale questionnaire template geared toward business use cases broadly, not specifically toward forced-choice/no-neutral designs. It appears to be a static, ready-to-use form rather than one built to actively investigate the reasoning behind strong opinions.

잘하는 점

Free and positioned specifically for business questionnaire use
Likely offers a conversational/chat-style survey format, which SurveySparrow is known for
Simple to customize statement wording for different business contexts

아쉬운 점

No stated support for an even-numbered, no-neutral scale specifically designed to reduce central-tendency bias
No adaptive AI or voice interview component to dig into the 'why' behind strongest agreement/disagreement
No automated per-response quality scoring or published AI prompt transparency

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template 무료로 시작하기

샘플 질문

Thanks for sharing your honest reactions to a few statements below. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There's no middle 'neutral' option this time — we'd rather know which way you lean, even slightly. About 7 minutes.

In the last 30 days, how often did you interact with (replace with the product, policy, or team being evaluated)?

For each statement, choose the response that comes closest to how you feel. There is no middle option — pick the side you lean toward.

Which one of those statements did you feel most strongly about, in either direction?

Overall, how strongly do you agree that (replace with the topic, e.g., 'the current policy') is working well?

Rank these statements from the one that matters most to you personally to the one that matters least.

Anything about (replace with the topic) that these statements didn't capture?

Which team or department are you part of?

How long have you been in your current role?

That's everything — thank you for being direct with us! Your responses feed into a report on where opinion is genuinely split versus where most people lean the same way.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문

주의력 확인 장치

AI가 작성한 문안

자동 리포트

다른 서비스와 비교

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?