모든 템플릿

Research Instrument Pilot Test Evaluation

Collects structured feedback from pilot participants on instrument clarity, cognitive burden, ambiguity sources, and session flow to guide pre-launch refinement of research questionnaires.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 23개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome and thank you for participating in this feedback session. The purpose of this survey is to gather your honest impressions of the research instrument you just completed during the pilot session. Your feedback will help us identify areas for improvement before the main study launch. This survey should take approximately 6–8 minutes. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your genuine experience. Your responses are confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. Please click 'Next' to begin.

Q02
객관식

Which device did you primarily use during today's pilot session?

  • Laptop or desktop
  • Tablet
  • Smartphone
  • Other (please specify)
Q03
의견 척도

How clear were the instructions provided throughout the pilot session?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how mentally taxing was today's pilot session?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all taxing최대:Extremely taxing
Q05
의견 척도

Overall, how smooth was the flow of the session from start to finish?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all smooth최대:Extremely smooth
Q06
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your pilot experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a few follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this feedback session. Your responses will directly help us improve the research instruments before the main study. If you have any questions, please contact the research team.

Q09
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take you to complete today's pilot session?

  • Less than 5 minutes
  • 5–10 minutes
  • 11–15 minutes
  • 16–20 minutes
  • 21–30 minutes
  • More than 30 minutes
Q10
의견 척도

How clear was the wording of individual questions?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q11
의견 척도

To what extent did the session feel repetitive?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:Extremely
Q12
객관식

Which of the following issues, if any, did you encounter? Select all that apply.

  • Confusing skip or branching logic
  • Unable to select or change an answer
  • An item did not load properly
  • Progress indicator was unclear
  • Instructions were missing or inconsistent
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above
Q13
장문형

Based on your experience today, is there anything else you would like to share about the pilot session?

Q14
객관식

Which of the following best describes your gender? Select all that apply.

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
의견 척도

How clear were the response options and scale labels?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q16
순위 매기기

Rank the following factors by how much they contributed to any fatigue you experienced. Drag the biggest contributor to the top.

  1. Length of session
  2. Repetitive items
  3. Complex or technical wording
  4. Unclear instructions or scale labels
  5. Visual layout or design
  6. Technical issues (e.g., slow loading)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q17
장문형

Please describe or paste any specific items, phrases, or instructions that were confusing (optional).

Q18
장문형

If you selected "Prefer to self-describe," please specify (optional).

Q19
객관식

How many items, if any, felt ambiguous or hard to interpret?

  • None
  • 1–2 items
  • 3–5 items
  • 6–10 items
  • More than 10 items
Q20
드롭다운

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
순위 매기기

Rank the following factors by how much they contributed to any ambiguity you experienced. Drag the biggest contributor to the top.

  1. Vague wording
  2. Technical terms or jargon
  3. Double-barreled items
  4. Missing response options
  5. Unclear scale labels
  6. Visual layout or formatting
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q22
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • High school or less
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Retired
  • Unemployed and looking for work
  • Not seeking work
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview segment that lets an AI moderator probe deeper into a participant's pilot experience in real time, something static form builders can't do
  • Uses ranking questions to isolate specific contributors to ambiguity and to fatigue, rather than relying on a single generic satisfaction score
  • Pairs opinion-scale ratings on instruction clarity, question wording clarity, response-option clarity, cognitive burden, repetitiveness, and overall flow with open-text prompts for verbatim problem examples
  • Captures pilot-session context (device used, completion time, issues encountered) plus standard demographic segmentation (age, gender, region, education, employment) to support pre-launch instrument refinement

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.