QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Real Estate Visit Booking & Viewing Experience Survey

Captures how easy it was to book a property visit, whether the viewing matched expectations, and how likely the prospect is to move forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into hesitations and what would turn interest into an offer. Built for real estate agencies and property platforms tracking their showing pipeline.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a moment to share feedback on your recent property visit! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 7 minutes and helps us make scheduling and showings better.

Q02
객관식필수

How did you book this property visit?

  • Called the agency
  • Booked online through a website or app
  • Messaged the agent directly
  • Walked in without an appointment
  • Agent reached out to me
Q03
평점 척도필수

How easy was it to schedule this visit?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q04
객관식필수

Did the agent arrive on time for the scheduled visit?

  • Arrived early
  • On time
  • Slightly late (under 15 minutes)
  • Significantly late (15+ minutes)
  • Agent didn't show up
Q05
매트릭스필수

Please rate the following aspects of your visit.

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Agent's knowledge of the property
  • How well the property matched the online listing
  • Cleanliness and condition of the property
  • The neighborhood, as experienced in person
  • Value for the asking price
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to move forward with this property, for example by making an offer or scheduling a follow-up visit?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-proceed score. If the score is low or middling, identify the specific concern (price, condition, location, financing, competing property) and ask what would need to change for them to move forward. If the score is high, confirm what sealed the interest and whether anything is still holding them back from acting immediately.

Q08
객관식필수

Would you book another visit through this agent or agency for a different property?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Probably
  • Probably not
  • Definitely not
Q09
장문형

What's one thing that would have made this visit more useful or comfortable?

Q10
객관식

Which best describes your current housing situation?

  • First-time buyer
  • Repeat buyer
  • Renter looking to buy
  • Investor
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to our showings team to help us improve how visits are booked and run.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a static booking form by including an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasons behind a prospect's likelihood-to-proceed score and what would turn interest into an offer
  • Covers the full visit lifecycle in one flow — booking method, scheduling ease, agent punctuality, a multi-aspect ratings matrix, and post-visit intent — rather than just capturing the initial booking request
  • Pairs a quantitative likelihood-to-move-forward scale with open-ended and adaptive follow-up questions, so agencies get both trackable pipeline metrics and qualitative hesitation detail
  • Includes housing situation and age range segmentation plus an agent/agency loyalty question, letting teams cut showing-pipeline performance by prospect type

SurveySparrow

Real Estate Visit Booking Form Template

A ready-to-use booking form template focused on capturing visit scheduling details rather than post-visit experience or conversion intent. It's built on SurveySparrow's conversational form format, which is more engaging than a plain field-by-field form but still runs on fixed question logic. Best suited for the booking step itself, not for gathering feedback on how the viewing went.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style form format that's quick to deploy
  • Purpose-built for the real estate visit-booking use case
  • Part of a broader mainstream survey/form platform with established distribution options

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all questions are fixed at design time
  • Appears focused on booking capture rather than post-visit experience, expectation match, or move-forward likelihood
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted

Typeform

Real Estate Visit Booking Form Template

A polished, one-question-at-a-time booking form template well suited for scheduling a property visit. Typeform is known for strong form design and UX, but this template is oriented toward intake/scheduling rather than capturing post-visit viewing experience or conversion signals. Follow-up logic is limited to conditional branching, not open-ended probing.

잘하는 점

  • Strong, well-known form design and completion-rate optimization
  • Easy embedding and sharing across web and email channels
  • Simple to customize branding for an agency's booking page

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into hesitations or what would convert interest into an offer
  • Static question set with basic conditional logic, not adaptive per-response probing
  • No built-in quality scoring of open-text responses or automated report generation

QuestionPro

Real Estate Survey Template

A general-purpose real estate survey template rather than one specifically designed around the visit-booking-to-viewing-to-decision journey. It likely covers broader real estate satisfaction or market-research questions, which makes it less targeted than a visit-experience-specific instrument. Useful as a starting point but would need substantial customization for showing-pipeline tracking.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with analytics and reporting tools
  • Flexible enough to be adapted to various real estate research needs beyond just visits
  • Supports standard question types (ratings, multiple choice) common to survey design

아쉬운 점

  • Not specifically structured around the book-visit-decide funnel, so it may miss visit-specific details like agent punctuality or scheduling ease
  • No adaptive AI interview capability to explore why a prospect is or isn't moving forward
  • No transparent, publishable prompt logic or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기