모든 템플릿

Cookie Paywall Fairness & Consent Alternatives Survey

Measures consumer perceptions of fairness, transparency, and trust in cookie paywalls versus privacy-friendly content-access alternatives. Designed for UX researchers, privacy professionals, and publishers seeking GDPR-aligned consent insights.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey explores your experiences with cookie banners, cookie paywalls, and alternative ways websites can fund content while respecting your privacy. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. All responses are confidential, anonymized, and will be reported only in aggregate for research purposes. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. The survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete.

Q02
객관식

How often do you visit news, blog, or magazine websites?

  • Multiple times a day
  • About once a day
  • A few times a week
  • About once a week
  • A few times a month
  • Less than once a month
Q03
메시지

The following questions ask about your cookie paywall experiences. If you have not encountered a cookie paywall, please answer based on your general impressions of such practices.

Q04
순위 매기기

Please rank these ways websites could fund content while reducing tracking, from most acceptable (1) to least acceptable.

  1. Ad-supported with essential-only cookies
  2. Contextual (non-tracking) ads
  3. Subscription (monthly/annual)
  4. One-time micropayment per article
  5. Donation or pay-what-you-want
  6. Free access with privacy-preserving analytics
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
의견 척도

How important is it to you that a website clearly discloses how your data will be used before asking you to accept cookies or pay?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all important최대:Extremely important
Q06
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your thoughts in a bit more depth. An AI interviewer will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about your experiences with cookie paywalls and what would make consent practices fairer.

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses will help us better understand how people perceive fairness, transparency, and consent in online content access. All data will be reported only in aggregate.

Q09
객관식

In the past 3 months, how often did you encounter a cookie consent banner when visiting websites?

  • Never
  • Rarely (a few times total)
  • Sometimes (a few times a month)
  • Often (a few times a week)
  • Very often (almost every session)
Q10
장문형

Where did you encounter cookie paywalls? Please name specific sites or types of sites (e.g., news outlets, blogs, streaming services).

Q11
의견 척도

How fair do you find ad-supported access with essential-only cookies, considering both users and publishers?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all fair최대:Extremely fair
Q12
순위 매기기

Please rank what you value most when accessing online content, from most important (1) to least important.

  1. Strong privacy protection
  2. Low or no cost to me
  3. High-quality, reliable content
  4. Convenient access (few clicks, no login)
  5. Support for publishers and journalists
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q13
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about cookie paywalls, consent experiences, or alternative ways to access online content.

Q14
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

In the past 3 months, did you encounter a "cookie paywall" — that is, a site that required you to either accept tracking cookies or pay before you could access content?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q16
의견 척도

Overall, how fair did the cookie paywalls you encountered feel?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all fair최대:Extremely fair
Q17
의견 척도

How fair do you find contextual (non-tracking) advertising, considering both users and publishers?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all fair최대:Extremely fair
Q18
객관식

Where do you currently live?

  • Europe — EU/EEA member state
  • Europe — non-EU
  • North America
  • Asia
  • Africa
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: "I felt I had a genuine choice between accepting cookies and a reasonable alternative."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q20
의견 척도

How fair do you find a subscription model (monthly or annual fee), considering both users and publishers?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all fair최대:Extremely fair
Q21
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school or less
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or technical program
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: "The cookie paywall clearly explained what data would be collected and how it would be used."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
의견 척도

How fair do you find one-time micropayments per article, considering both users and publishers?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all fair최대:Extremely fair
Q24
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Homemaker
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: "The terms and options presented were easy to understand."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q26
객관식

When faced with a cookie paywall, which of the following actions have you taken? Select all that apply.

  • Accepted all cookies to continue
  • Customized cookie preferences
  • Left the site
  • Used a browser reader mode or extension
  • Returned later via a different device or browser
  • Paid to access instead of accepting tracking
  • Other (please specify)

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes a dedicated ranking question comparing funding models (ad-supported, contextual ads, subscriptions, micropayments) on privacy-vs-tracking tradeoffs, not just a single satisfaction score
  • Uses paired opinion-scale items to isolate perceived fairness of cookie paywalls from perceived transparency and genuine choice, which static consent forms don't attempt to measure
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended reasoning behind fairness ratings, going beyond fixed-choice consent forms
  • Collects contextual screening questions (site visit frequency, past 3-month exposure to cookie banners and paywalls) before opinion questions, so results can be segmented by actual exposure level

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.