Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
University Course Pre-Registration Experience Survey
Measures how smoothly students moved through course pre-registration — portal usability, course availability, advisor support, and overall satisfaction — for registrars and academic advising teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what went wrong during the student's most recent registration attempt, not just how they rated it.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
How did you complete your most recent course pre-registration?
- Online registration portal, on my own
- Online portal, with help from an advisor
- In-person or phone registration with staff
- I attempted it but did not complete it
- I have not yet registered
Q03
의견 척도필수
Overall, how easy was it to navigate the registration process from start to finish?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q04
객관식필수
Were you able to get into the courses you wanted this term?
- Yes, all of them
- Most of them
- Only some of them
- None of them
Q05
매트릭스필수
Rate each part of the registration process based on your recent experience.
4개 행 × 4개 열
- Speed and reliability of the registration portal
- Clarity of course descriptions and prerequisites
- Availability of your academic advisor
- Communication about waitlist status and updates
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Excellent
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these would most improve pre-registration for you, and which matters least?
- More open seats in high-demand courses
- Clearer prerequisite and degree audit information
- Faster, more reliable registration website
- Easier access to advisors during registration week
- Mobile-friendly registration experience
- Real-time waitlist status updates
- Earlier notice of registration windows
- Simpler process for course swaps or overrides
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would help most최악:Would help least
Q07
평점 척도
How would you rate the support you received from your academic advisor during registration?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q08
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend your school's registration process to a friend or fellow student?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct exactly what happened the last time this student tried to register: what course or section they were trying to get, at what point things went smoothly or broke down (portal crash, closed section, prerequisite block, advisor unavailable, waitlist confusion), and what they ended up doing as a workaround. If they rated the process highly, probe what specifically made it feel easy so it can be preserved. If they could not complete registration, dig into the exact step where they got stuck.
Q10
장문형
Is there anything about the pre-registration process you'd change if you could wave a magic wand?
Q11
객관식
What is your current class standing?
- Freshman / first-year
- Sophomore / second-year
- Junior / third-year
- Senior / fourth-year or above
- Graduate student
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
Are you currently enrolled full-time or part-time?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will go directly to the registrar's office and advising team to help simplify registration for future terms.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened during the student's most recent registration attempt, rather than stopping at a satisfaction score
- Combines structured measures (opinion scale, matrix ratings, max-diff prioritization) with open-ended and adaptive follow-up questions to capture both breadth and root-cause detail
- Separately measures portal usability, course availability, and advisor support so registrars and advising teams can see exactly where the process breaks down
- Ends with a long-text 'what would you change' question plus automated reporting, so findings are ready to route directly to the registrar's office
SurveySparrow
University Pre-Registration Form Template | Simplify Student RegistrationA fielding-ready form template aimed at collecting student pre-registration details for universities. It appears built for structured data collection (e.g., course/section selection) rather than diagnosing friction in the registration experience itself. Good starting point if the goal is intake, not experience measurement.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for university pre-registration contexts
- Likely offers conversational/chat-style form formatting typical of SurveySparrow templates
- Ready to deploy without custom build time
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a specific registration attempt failed
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
- Likely a static question set focused on capturing choices, not reconstructing the student's actual experience
SurveyMonkey
Course Registration Form TemplateA standard course registration form template, likely used to collect student course selections rather than to evaluate the registration experience. It's a general-purpose, fielding-ready template but not tailored to diagnosing portal usability, advisor support, or availability issues.
잘하는 점
- Widely trusted, easy-to-deploy survey platform
- Simple setup for collecting course selection data
- Broad template library for education use cases
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct what went wrong for a specific student
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
- Static question format limits depth on advisor support and process friction
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.