모든 템플릿

HR Issue Reporting & Resolution Experience Survey

Tracks how employees experience the process of raising issues with HR — from reporting channel and response speed to fairness, confidentiality, and final resolution. Built for HR and People Ops teams auditing their issue-handling process, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened in a specific case instead of relying on averaged satisfaction scores.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We want to understand what it's actually like to raise an issue or concern with HR — good, bad, or in between. Everything you share is confidential and helps us improve the process. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, have you reported an issue or concern to HR (for example, a workplace conflict, policy question, harassment concern, or benefits problem)?

  • Yes, once
  • Yes, multiple times
  • No, but I'm aware of how the process works
  • No, I wouldn't know how to report one
Q03
객관식

Which category best describes the most recent issue you reported to HR?

  • Workplace conflict or interpersonal issue
  • Compensation or benefits
  • Policy clarification
  • Harassment or discrimination
  • Performance management
  • Workload or scheduling
  • Other
Q04
객관식

How did you report this issue?

  • In-person meeting
  • Email
  • Online HR portal or ticketing system
  • Phone call
  • Anonymous hotline or form
  • Other
Q05
평점 척도

How would you rate the speed of HR's initial response after you reported your issue?

범위: 15
최소:Much slower than expected최대:Much faster than expected
Q06
매트릭스

Thinking about how your issue was handled, how much do you agree with each statement?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • HR communicated clearly about next steps
  • My issue was kept confidential
  • I was treated fairly and without bias
  • My issue was resolved within a reasonable time
  • HR followed up with me after the resolution
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with how your issue was resolved?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Explore the respondent's most recently reported HR issue in detail: what actually happened, how the timeline unfolded from report to resolution, and which specific action or piece of communication from HR most shaped their satisfaction. If they rated fairness or confidentiality poorly, probe for the exact moment trust broke down. If they have never reported an issue, ask what would need to be true for them to trust HR enough to do so.

Q09
순위 매기기

Rank these possible improvements to HR's issue-handling process in order of what would matter most to you.

  1. Faster initial response times
  2. Clearer communication about process and status
  3. More confidentiality or anonymity in reporting
  4. More consistent outcomes across similar cases
  5. Easier ways to submit a report
  6. More follow-up after the issue is resolved
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q10
의견 척도필수

Based on your experience, how likely are you to report a future issue or concern to HR?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q11
드롭다운

Which department do you work in? (Optional)

  • Engineering & Product
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • HR/People
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you worked at the company? (Optional)

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your responses will be reviewed alongside others (never individually identified) to improve how HR handles employee concerns.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a static intake form by using an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct exactly what happened in the respondent's specific HR case, rather than relying on averaged satisfaction scores
  • Combines structured questions (reporting channel, response speed rating, resolution satisfaction, a fairness/confidentiality matrix, and a ranking of improvement priorities) with open-ended AI probing for depth
  • Captures optional department and tenure data for segmentation while keeping the core flow anonymous and focused on trust and future reporting likelihood
  • Includes transparent chat-style framing at open and close so respondents understand how their responses will be used, supporting honest disclosure of sensitive issues

SurveySparrow

HR Issue Tracking Form Template

This is a fielding-ready form built specifically for logging HR issues, so it's a direct topical match. It appears structured around intake fields (issue type, description, status) rather than a deep post-resolution experience survey. Like most form builders, it relies on fixed questions rather than adaptive follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for HR issue tracking, so terminology and fields likely map closely to HR workflows
  • Part of a conversational-style survey product, so the intake experience is probably more engaging than a plain form
  • Ready to deploy quickly for basic issue logging

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct the specifics of a respondent's individual case
  • No visible mechanism for automated per-response quality scoring
  • Likely focused on issue logging/tracking rather than measuring fairness, confidentiality, or resolution satisfaction over time

Jotform

Issue Tracking Form Template

This is a generic, general-purpose issue tracking form template, not one built specifically for HR or employee relations use cases. It's fielding-ready as a basic intake/log form but would need significant customization to capture HR-specific concerns like confidentiality and fairness. It's a static form rather than an interview experience.

잘하는 점

  • Flexible, easy to customize for many issue types beyond HR
  • Simple, familiar form-builder interface for quick setup
  • Likely supports basic file attachments common to issue logging

아쉬운 점

  • Not tailored to HR issue reporting specifically — no built-in fairness, confidentiality, or resolution-experience questions
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option to explore what actually happened in a case
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.