모든 템플릿

Forecast Confidence & Scenario Planning Assessment

Assesses team confidence in operational forecast accuracy, input quality, and scenario planning practices across functions. Designed for cross-functional teams to identify forecasting gaps, process bottlenecks, and planning improvement priorities.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Forecast Confidence & Scenario Planning Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with operational forecasts and scenario planning in your area. Your responses will help us identify gaps, improve accuracy, and strengthen planning processes. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest perspective. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.

Q02
객관식

Which of the following best describes your involvement with operational forecasts?

  • I help create forecasts
  • I use forecasts but don't create them
  • I rarely or never use forecasts
Q03
의견 척도

How confident were you in the accuracy of forecasts used in your area during the last quarter?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q04
드롭다운

How often were forecasts updated in your area during the last quarter?

  • Real-time or daily
  • Weekly
  • Bi-weekly
  • Monthly
  • Quarterly
  • Less often than quarterly
  • Only ad hoc
Q05
메시지

The following questions shift focus to scenario planning exercises conducted over the past 6 months.

Q06
장문형

If you could improve one thing about your area's forecasts or scenario planning inputs next quarter, what would you prioritize?

Q07
드롭다운

Which function or area do you primarily support?

  • Operations
  • Supply Chain
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Product
  • Engineering
  • Customer Support
  • People/HR
  • IT
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform improvements to our forecasting processes and scenario planning practices.

Q09
드롭다운

What is the primary time horizon you focus on for forecasts in your area?

  • Within-week
  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • Quarterly
  • 6–12 months
  • 12+ months
  • Not applicable
Q10
의견 척도

How would you rate the overall accuracy of your area's primary forecast last quarter?

척도: 17
최소:Very inaccurate최대:Very accurate
Q11
객관식

Which of the following were the top obstacles to confident forecasting in your area? Please select up to 3.

  • Unclear or misaligned assumptions
  • Data latency or quality issues
  • High external volatility
  • Limited cross-functional coordination
  • Inadequate tools or automation
  • Unclear ownership or governance
  • Scenario ranges too narrow
  • Insufficient domain expertise
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
객관식

In the last 6 months, how often did your area conduct scenario planning exercises?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • Twice
  • Quarterly
  • Monthly or more often
Q13
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your forecasting and scenario planning experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q14
드롭다운

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director
  • VP or above
Q15
의견 척도

How confident were you in the quality of historical and internal data used as forecast inputs last quarter?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q16
의견 척도

How clear were the key assumptions and drivers used in your area's most recent scenario planning exercise?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q17
드롭다운

How long have you been in your current role?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q18
의견 척도

How confident were you in the quality of external market and economic data used as forecast inputs last quarter?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q19
의견 척도

How useful were the outputs from your area's most recent scenario planning exercise for decision-making?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q20
드롭다운

Which region do you primarily work in?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
Q21
의견 척도

How confident were you in the quality of cross-functional input and expert judgment used in forecasts last quarter?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on forecast accuracy, data quality, and cross-functional input with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes low-confidence areas in the respondent's own words
  • Separates confidence in historical/internal data from confidence in external market data and expert judgment, giving forecasting teams a more diagnostic breakdown than a single generic rating
  • Includes dedicated scenario-planning questions (frequency, clarity of assumptions, usefulness of outputs) alongside an open-text prompt for improvement priorities, plus role/function/tenure/region segmentation for cross-functional analysis
  • Automatically scores response quality and generates a report, so results on forecasting gaps and planning bottlenecks are ready for review without manual tallying

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.