모든 템플릿

Internal Data Product SLA Expectations Survey

Captures stakeholder expectations for data product availability, freshness, and quality to inform internal SLO/SLA definitions. Designed for data consumers across engineering, analytics, and business teams.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 17개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for participating in this survey about our internal data products. We're gathering your expectations around reliability (uptime), data freshness, and data quality to set clear, realistic service-level targets. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. Responses will be anonymized and reported in aggregate to the data platform team. There are no right or wrong answers—we simply want your honest expectations.

Q02
드롭다운

How often do you use internal data products (dashboards, datasets, pipelines) in your work?

  • Daily
  • 2–3 times per week
  • Weekly
  • Less than weekly
  • Rarely or never
Q03
객관식

What minimum monthly availability (uptime) do you expect from the data products you rely on?

  • 99.0% (~7.3 hours downtime/month)
  • 99.5% (~3.6 hours downtime/month)
  • 99.9% (~43 minutes downtime/month)
  • 99.95% (~22 minutes downtime/month)
  • Unsure
Q04
드롭다운

What is the minimum acceptable overall data accuracy rate for your production use?

  • 99.9% or higher
  • 99.5%
  • 99.0%
  • 97%
  • 95%
  • 90%
  • Below 90%
  • Unsure
Q05
객관식

How quickly should we notify you when a data incident is detected?

  • Immediately
  • Within 15 minutes
  • Within 1 hour
  • Within 4 hours
  • Same business day
  • Next business day
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses, is there anything else we should consider about your data reliability, freshness, or quality expectations? Please share any additional context, pain points, or priorities.

Q07
객관식

What is your primary role?

  • Data analyst
  • Data engineer
  • Data scientist
  • Product manager
  • Software engineer
  • Business stakeholder
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
메시지

Thank you for your input. Your responses will help us define clear, realistic service-level targets for our internal data products. We expect to share proposed SLOs with stakeholders within the coming weeks.

Q09
의견 척도

How critical are internal data products for completing your work on time?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all critical최대:Absolutely critical
Q10
객관식

Which planned maintenance windows are acceptable to you? Select all that apply.

  • No regular windows acceptable
  • Weeknights 6–10 pm (local)
  • Overnight 10 pm–6 am (local)
  • Weekends
  • Flexible with advance notice
Q11
드롭다운

What is the maximum acceptable duplicate record rate in datasets delivered to you?

  • 0% (no duplicates tolerated)
  • Under 0.1%
  • Under 0.5%
  • Under 1%
  • Under 2%
  • Under 5%
  • Unsure
Q12
객관식

What are your preferred channels for incident and maintenance notifications? Select all that apply.

  • Slack/Teams
  • Email
  • Status page
  • PagerDuty/On-call
  • In-product banner
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
드롭다운

Which team or department are you part of?

  • Analytics
  • Data platform
  • Finance
  • Operations
  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Product
  • Engineering
  • Other
Q14
객관식

What data freshness (maximum acceptable lag) do you require for your primary workflows?

  • Real-time (under 1 minute)
  • Under 15 minutes
  • Under 1 hour
  • Under 6 hours
  • Under 24 hours
  • Weekly or less frequently
  • Unsure
Q15
순위 매기기

Please rank the following data quality dimensions by importance to your work (drag to reorder, 1 = most important).

  1. Accuracy
  2. Completeness
  3. Timeliness
  4. Consistency
  5. Validity
  6. Lineage/transparency
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q16
드롭다운

How many years of experience do you have working with data in your current or similar roles?

  • Under 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q17
드롭다운

What is your primary working time zone?

  • UTC−8 to −5 (Americas)
  • UTC−4 to 0 (Atlantic/Europe West)
  • UTC+1 to +3 (Europe/Africa)
  • UTC+4 to +7 (Middle East/Asia)
  • UTC+8 to +10 (East Asia/Australia)
  • UTC+11 to +12 (Pacific)
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that probes deeper into each stakeholder's SLA expectations after they answer the structured questions, something static form builders can't replicate.
  • Purpose-built for data product SLOs/SLAs: covers concrete metrics like uptime percentage, maintenance windows, freshness lag, accuracy rate, and duplicate record rate rather than generic satisfaction questions.
  • Captures incident-response expectations directly (notification speed and preferred channels) plus a ranked prioritization of quality dimensions, giving teams data they can turn straight into SLO targets.
  • Segments results by role, department, tenure, and time zone so engineering, analytics, and business stakeholders' differing expectations can be compared side by side in the auto-generated report.

SurveySparrow

Product Feedback Survey Template

This is a general-purpose product feedback template, not one designed for internal data product SLA/SLO definition — it lacks any uptime, freshness, or data-quality-specific questions. It's a reasonable starting point for basic satisfaction feedback but would need heavy customization to serve as a data governance/SLA survey.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy conversational survey format
  • Established template library and easy customization for general feedback use cases

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — responses are static and can't be probed further
  • No built-in questions or logic for SLA metrics like uptime, freshness lag, or duplicate rates
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

QuestionPro

Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample Questionnaire

A generic product evaluation template aimed at rating product features and satisfaction broadly, not internal data products specifically. It offers a starting questionnaire structure but contains no data-SLA vocabulary (availability, freshness, incident notification) and would require substantial rebuilding for this use case.

잘하는 점

  • Broad question bank suited to general product evaluation
  • Established enterprise survey platform with standard logic/branching features

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore stakeholder-specific SLA concerns
  • No native questions covering data freshness, uptime targets, or duplicate/accuracy thresholds
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure for any AI-assisted follow-up

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.