Internal Data Product SLA Expectations Survey
Captures stakeholder expectations for data product availability, freshness, and quality to inform internal SLO/SLA definitions. Designed for data consumers across engineering, analytics, and business teams.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How often do you use internal data products (dashboards, datasets, pipelines) in your work?
- Daily
- 2–3 times per week
- Weekly
- Less than weekly
- Rarely or never
What minimum monthly availability (uptime) do you expect from the data products you rely on?
- 99.0% (~7.3 hours downtime/month)
- 99.5% (~3.6 hours downtime/month)
- 99.9% (~43 minutes downtime/month)
- 99.95% (~22 minutes downtime/month)
- Unsure
What is the minimum acceptable overall data accuracy rate for your production use?
- 99.9% or higher
- 99.5%
- 99.0%
- 97%
- 95%
- 90%
- Below 90%
- Unsure
How quickly should we notify you when a data incident is detected?
- Immediately
- Within 15 minutes
- Within 1 hour
- Within 4 hours
- Same business day
- Next business day
Based on your responses, is there anything else we should consider about your data reliability, freshness, or quality expectations? Please share any additional context, pain points, or priorities.
What is your primary role?
- Data analyst
- Data engineer
- Data scientist
- Product manager
- Software engineer
- Business stakeholder
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for your input. Your responses will help us define clear, realistic service-level targets for our internal data products. We expect to share proposed SLOs with stakeholders within the coming weeks.
How critical are internal data products for completing your work on time?
Which planned maintenance windows are acceptable to you? Select all that apply.
- No regular windows acceptable
- Weeknights 6–10 pm (local)
- Overnight 10 pm–6 am (local)
- Weekends
- Flexible with advance notice
What is the maximum acceptable duplicate record rate in datasets delivered to you?
- 0% (no duplicates tolerated)
- Under 0.1%
- Under 0.5%
- Under 1%
- Under 2%
- Under 5%
- Unsure
What are your preferred channels for incident and maintenance notifications? Select all that apply.
- Slack/Teams
- Status page
- PagerDuty/On-call
- In-product banner
- Other (please specify)
Which team or department are you part of?
- Analytics
- Data platform
- Finance
- Operations
- Marketing
- Sales
- Product
- Engineering
- Other
What data freshness (maximum acceptable lag) do you require for your primary workflows?
- Real-time (under 1 minute)
- Under 15 minutes
- Under 1 hour
- Under 6 hours
- Under 24 hours
- Weekly or less frequently
- Unsure
Please rank the following data quality dimensions by importance to your work (drag to reorder, 1 = most important).
- Accuracy
- Completeness
- Timeliness
- Consistency
- Validity
- Lineage/transparency
How many years of experience do you have working with data in your current or similar roles?
- Under 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- More than 10 years
What is your primary working time zone?
- UTC−8 to −5 (Americas)
- UTC−4 to 0 (Atlantic/Europe West)
- UTC+1 to +3 (Europe/Africa)
- UTC+4 to +7 (Middle East/Asia)
- UTC+8 to +10 (East Asia/Australia)
- UTC+11 to +12 (Pacific)
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that probes deeper into each stakeholder's SLA expectations after they answer the structured questions, something static form builders can't replicate.
- Purpose-built for data product SLOs/SLAs: covers concrete metrics like uptime percentage, maintenance windows, freshness lag, accuracy rate, and duplicate record rate rather than generic satisfaction questions.
- Captures incident-response expectations directly (notification speed and preferred channels) plus a ranked prioritization of quality dimensions, giving teams data they can turn straight into SLO targets.
- Segments results by role, department, tenure, and time zone so engineering, analytics, and business stakeholders' differing expectations can be compared side by side in the auto-generated report.
SurveySparrow
Product Feedback Survey TemplateThis is a general-purpose product feedback template, not one designed for internal data product SLA/SLO definition — it lacks any uptime, freshness, or data-quality-specific questions. It's a reasonable starting point for basic satisfaction feedback but would need heavy customization to serve as a data governance/SLA survey.
잘하는 점
- Quick to deploy conversational survey format
- Established template library and easy customization for general feedback use cases
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — responses are static and can't be probed further
- No built-in questions or logic for SLA metrics like uptime, freshness lag, or duplicate rates
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
QuestionPro
Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample QuestionnaireA generic product evaluation template aimed at rating product features and satisfaction broadly, not internal data products specifically. It offers a starting questionnaire structure but contains no data-SLA vocabulary (availability, freshness, incident notification) and would require substantial rebuilding for this use case.
잘하는 점
- Broad question bank suited to general product evaluation
- Established enterprise survey platform with standard logic/branching features
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to explore stakeholder-specific SLA concerns
- No native questions covering data freshness, uptime targets, or duplicate/accuracy thresholds
- No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure for any AI-assisted follow-up
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.