Annual Planning Priorities, Risks, and Bold Bets Survey
Collects input from every level of the organization on top priorities, resourcing tradeoffs, biggest risks, and the bold bets people would make for next year. An AI follow-up presses into the reasoning, blockers, and resources behind each person's proposed bet, so planning starts with real signal instead of guesses.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Rank these potential company priorities for next year from most to least important, in your view.
- (Replace with Priority A - e.g., Expand into new markets)
- (Replace with Priority B - e.g., Improve product reliability)
- (Replace with Priority C - e.g., Grow enterprise sales)
- (Replace with Priority D - e.g., Invest in AI capabilities)
- (Replace with Priority E - e.g., Strengthen operational efficiency) (Template note: swap in your own draft priorities before launching.)
From this list of potential bets for next year, which would create the most value for the business, and which the least?
- (Replace with new product/feature bet)
- (Replace with new market or segment bet)
- Invest heavily in AI or automation tooling
- Increase headcount in customer-facing teams
- Sunset or consolidate an underperforming product line
- (Replace with a key partnership or channel bet)
- Redesign the core product experience
- Build out data and analytics infrastructure
If you had 100 points to allocate across these areas for next year's investment, how would you split them?
- Product development
- Sales & marketing
- Customer support/success
- Operations & infrastructure
- People, culture & hiring
- Research & innovation
Right now, how confident are you that your team has what it needs to hit an ambitious goal next year?
For each area, how much of a risk do you see for the business over the next 12 months?
- Talent and retention risk
- Competitive risk
- Macroeconomic/market risk
- Technology or security risk
- Execution and operational risk
- 외 1개
What is the single biggest constraint limiting your team's ability to execute well next year?
- Headcount or staffing
- Budget
- Tooling or technology
- Cross-team dependencies or support
- Unclear priorities or leadership direction
If you could make one bold bet for the organization next year — something bigger than business as usual — what would it be and why?
Dig into the respondent's bold bet: what would concretely change day-to-day, what resources, budget, or permission it would require, and what has stopped the organization from doing it already. If they flagged any risk area as 'Severe', ask what a leading indicator of that risk showing up would look like and what mitigation they'd prioritize first. If their bold bet was vague, push for a specific first step someone could take within 90 days.
Almost done — just a couple of quick optional questions about your role, so we can see how priorities differ across the organization.
Which area of the business do you primarily work in?
- Product
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Customer success/support
- Operations
- People/HR
- Finance
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Director/senior manager
- VP/executive
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for the input! Your priorities, risk read, and bold bet feed directly into the planning discussion — leadership will see aggregated results before final decisions are made.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Pairs a open-text bold-bet prompt with a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that digs into what would concretely change day-to-day, blockers, and resources needed — turning a one-line idea into real signal instead of a guess.
- Uses ranking, best-worst trade-off, and point-allocation (100-point allocation) together so leadership gets forced trade-offs on priorities and investment, not just unranked opinions.
- Includes a matrix question rating risk across multiple business areas over the next 12 months plus a multiple-choice constraint question, giving a structured risk-and-blocker map alongside the qualitative bets.
- Closes with optional role/level segmentation (area of business, level) so priorities, risk reads, and bold bets can be cut by who is saying them, without forcing identification up front.
Jotform
Capacity Planning Checklist Form TemplateThis is a static checklist form focused narrowly on tracking capacity/resource items, not a survey designed to collect organization-wide input on strategic priorities, risks, and bold bets. It's fielding-ready as a form but scoped to operational capacity tracking rather than annual planning strategy. Useful for ops teams doing resource checklists, but not a direct substitute for a cross-level planning-input survey.
잘하는 점
- Quick to deploy using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
- Simple, structured checklist format that's easy for respondents to complete fast
- Backed by Jotform's broad template library and integrations
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up — it's a fixed checklist, so there's no way to probe reasoning, blockers, or resourcing behind any answer
- No prioritization methodology like ranking, max-diff, or constant-sum allocation for trading off competing priorities
- No cross-level role/level segmentation or automated per-response quality scoring, and no publicly stated methodology behind the checklist's structure
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.