AI Error Tolerance & Recovery Experience Survey
Measures user experiences with AI errors, recovery preferences, and resulting trust impact. Designed for AI product teams seeking to prioritize reliability improvements and reduce error-driven churn.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Have you used any AI-powered product or feature in the last 30 days?
- Yes
- No
In the last 30 days, did you encounter any AI output that you would consider a mistake or error?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
How tolerant are you of occasional mistakes in AI-generated outputs?
When an AI tool makes a mistake, how important is it to you that the recovery process is fast?
After successfully recovering from an AI mistake, how confident do you feel about continuing to use the AI tool?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experiences with AI errors, recovery, or trust? (Please do not include personal data.)
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your anonymous feedback will be used to improve AI error handling and recovery experiences.
Which of the following AI product categories have you used most frequently in the last 30 days?
- Writing assistant (e.g., drafting, rewriting)
- Code assistant (e.g., coding, debugging)
- Image or video generation
- Search with AI-generated answers
- Customer support chatbot
- Productivity suite with AI (docs, slides, email)
- Data analysis or BI assistant
- Other
Approximately how many distinct AI mistakes did you notice in the last 30 days?
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- More than 20
At approximately what error rate would you consider stopping use of an AI feature?
- Less than 1% of interactions
- 1–2%
- 3–5%
- 6–10%
- More than 10%
- Not sure
Please rank the following recovery features from most helpful (1) to least helpful (6) when recovering from an AI mistake.
- Ability to retry with a revised prompt
- Step-by-step guided correction
- Clear explanation of what went wrong
- Access to a help article or tips
- Live chat with a support agent
- Community forum or peer support
Overall, how much do you trust AI-powered features to produce accurate and reliable outputs?
We'd like to understand your experience with AI errors in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How frequently do you use AI-powered features in a typical week?
- Less than once a week
- 1–2 times a week
- 3–5 times a week
- About once a day
- Multiple times a day
Which of the following types of mistakes did you encounter? Select all that apply.
- Factual inaccuracy
- Irrelevant or off-topic output
- Biased or unsafe content
- Hallucinated references or sources
- Misinterpreted my instructions
- Formatting or structure issues
- Tool or plugin execution failed
- Other (please specify)
When you receive an unsatisfactory AI output, what is your first-choice method for recovering?
- Retry with a better prompt
- Use a step-by-step guided fix
- Consult a help article or tips
- Chat with a support agent
- Search a community forum
- Other (please specify)
Over the next 90 days, how do you expect the reliability of AI tools to change?
In which region do you primarily reside?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- South America
- Prefer not to say
How severe was the single most impactful AI mistake you encountered in the last 30 days?
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: 'AI tools are transparent about when they might be wrong.'
What is your highest level of education?
- High school or less
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate
- Prefer not to say
Please briefly describe the most impactful AI mistake you encountered. What happened, and what was the effect on your work or task? (Do not include any personal data.)
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: 'When an AI makes a mistake, it is clearly communicated to me.'
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: 'AI providers are actively working to reduce errors in their products.'
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
생성형 AI 신뢰, 안전성 및 가드레일 선호도 설문조사
생성형 AI 도구에 대한 소비자 신뢰, 인지된 안전성 위험, 투명성 기대치, 가드레일 선호도를 측정하여 책임 있는 AI 제품 설계 및 정책 수립에 활용합니다.
템플릿 보기온디바이스 AI 학습: 소비자 신뢰 및 프라이버시 인식
온디바이스 AI 학습에 대한 소비자 인지도, 신뢰, 프라이버시 우려, 채택 의향을 측정합니다. 사용자가 로컬 AI 학습 기능을 어떻게 인식하고 평가하는지 이해하고자 하는 제품, UX, 프라이버시 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기AI Transparency, Control & Recourse Assessment
Measures user attitudes toward AI transparency, desired controls, and recourse expectations. Designed for product teams assessing trust gaps and prioritizing AI governance improvements.
템플릿 보기데이터 라벨링 QA, 편향성 및 지침 명확성 감사
데이터 라벨링 팀을 위한 운영 감사 설문으로, 지난 30일간의 지침 명확성, 편향 완화 관행, QA 엄격성, 워크플로 병목 현상을 측정합니다. 라벨러, 리뷰어, QA 리드를 대상으로 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기AR Virtual Try-On Realism & Purchase Confidence Study
Measures perceived realism, fit accuracy, and purchase confidence for augmented reality try-on features. Designed for e-commerce UX researchers seeking to identify AR experience gaps that drive returns and reduce conversion.
템플릿 보기AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey
Measures how ML/AI practitioners engage with model cards, evaluate documented limitations, and how documentation quality shapes trust and adoption decisions across deployment contexts.
템플릿 보기