모든 템플릿
AI & Technology

AI Error Tolerance & Recovery Experience Survey

Measures user experiences with AI errors, recovery preferences, and resulting trust impact. Designed for AI product teams seeking to prioritize reliability improvements and reduce error-driven churn.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 28개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this survey about your experiences with AI-powered tools. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes and covers your recent AI use, any errors you may have encountered, and how you handle them. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested only in your honest opinions and experiences. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate for internal product research purposes. Please do not include any personally identifiable information in your open-ended responses.

Q02
객관식

Have you used any AI-powered product or feature in the last 30 days?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

In the last 30 days, did you encounter any AI output that you would consider a mistake or error?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q04
의견 척도

How tolerant are you of occasional mistakes in AI-generated outputs?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all tolerant최대:Extremely tolerant
Q05
의견 척도

When an AI tool makes a mistake, how important is it to you that the recovery process is fast?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all important최대:Extremely important
Q06
의견 척도

After successfully recovering from an AI mistake, how confident do you feel about continuing to use the AI tool?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q07
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experiences with AI errors, recovery, or trust? (Please do not include personal data.)

Q08
객관식

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey! Your anonymous feedback will be used to improve AI error handling and recovery experiences.

Q10
드롭다운

Which of the following AI product categories have you used most frequently in the last 30 days?

  • Writing assistant (e.g., drafting, rewriting)
  • Code assistant (e.g., coding, debugging)
  • Image or video generation
  • Search with AI-generated answers
  • Customer support chatbot
  • Productivity suite with AI (docs, slides, email)
  • Data analysis or BI assistant
  • Other
Q11
드롭다운

Approximately how many distinct AI mistakes did you notice in the last 30 days?

  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • More than 20
Q12
드롭다운

At approximately what error rate would you consider stopping use of an AI feature?

  • Less than 1% of interactions
  • 1–2%
  • 3–5%
  • 6–10%
  • More than 10%
  • Not sure
Q13
순위 매기기

Please rank the following recovery features from most helpful (1) to least helpful (6) when recovering from an AI mistake.

  1. Ability to retry with a revised prompt
  2. Step-by-step guided correction
  3. Clear explanation of what went wrong
  4. Access to a help article or tips
  5. Live chat with a support agent
  6. Community forum or peer support
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q14
의견 척도

Overall, how much do you trust AI-powered features to produce accurate and reliable outputs?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q15
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your experience with AI errors in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q16
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Self-describe (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
객관식

How frequently do you use AI-powered features in a typical week?

  • Less than once a week
  • 1–2 times a week
  • 3–5 times a week
  • About once a day
  • Multiple times a day
Q18
객관식

Which of the following types of mistakes did you encounter? Select all that apply.

  • Factual inaccuracy
  • Irrelevant or off-topic output
  • Biased or unsafe content
  • Hallucinated references or sources
  • Misinterpreted my instructions
  • Formatting or structure issues
  • Tool or plugin execution failed
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
객관식

When you receive an unsatisfactory AI output, what is your first-choice method for recovering?

  • Retry with a better prompt
  • Use a step-by-step guided fix
  • Consult a help article or tips
  • Chat with a support agent
  • Search a community forum
  • Other (please specify)
Q20
의견 척도

Over the next 90 days, how do you expect the reliability of AI tools to change?

척도: 17
최소:Much less reliable최대:Much more reliable
Q21
드롭다운

In which region do you primarily reside?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

How severe was the single most impactful AI mistake you encountered in the last 30 days?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all severe최대:Extremely severe
Q23
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree with the following statement: 'AI tools are transparent about when they might be wrong.'

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q24
객관식

What is your highest level of education?

  • High school or less
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
장문형

Please briefly describe the most impactful AI mistake you encountered. What happened, and what was the effect on your work or task? (Do not include any personal data.)

Q26
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree with the following statement: 'When an AI makes a mistake, it is clearly communicated to me.'

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q27
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree with the following statement: 'AI providers are actively working to reduce errors in their products.'

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
AI & Technology

생성형 AI 신뢰, 안전성 및 가드레일 선호도 설문조사

생성형 AI 도구에 대한 소비자 신뢰, 인지된 안전성 위험, 투명성 기대치, 가드레일 선호도를 측정하여 책임 있는 AI 제품 설계 및 정책 수립에 활용합니다.

템플릿 보기
AI & Technology

온디바이스 AI 학습: 소비자 신뢰 및 프라이버시 인식

온디바이스 AI 학습에 대한 소비자 인지도, 신뢰, 프라이버시 우려, 채택 의향을 측정합니다. 사용자가 로컬 AI 학습 기능을 어떻게 인식하고 평가하는지 이해하고자 하는 제품, UX, 프라이버시 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
AI & Technology

AI Transparency, Control & Recourse Assessment

Measures user attitudes toward AI transparency, desired controls, and recourse expectations. Designed for product teams assessing trust gaps and prioritizing AI governance improvements.

템플릿 보기
AI & Technology

데이터 라벨링 QA, 편향성 및 지침 명확성 감사

데이터 라벨링 팀을 위한 운영 감사 설문으로, 지난 30일간의 지침 명확성, 편향 완화 관행, QA 엄격성, 워크플로 병목 현상을 측정합니다. 라벨러, 리뷰어, QA 리드를 대상으로 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
AI & Technology

AR Virtual Try-On Realism & Purchase Confidence Study

Measures perceived realism, fit accuracy, and purchase confidence for augmented reality try-on features. Designed for e-commerce UX researchers seeking to identify AR experience gaps that drive returns and reduce conversion.

템플릿 보기
AI & Technology

AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey

Measures how ML/AI practitioners engage with model cards, evaluate documented limitations, and how documentation quality shapes trust and adoption decisions across deployment contexts.

템플릿 보기