Nonprofit Program Alumni Engagement and Impact Survey
Tracks how connected alumni of a nonprofit program (fellowship, service corps, leadership cohort, scholarship, etc.) still feel to the organization, what keeps them involved or drifting away, and which reengagement offerings they'd actually value — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind their current engagement level.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How long ago did you complete or leave the program?
- Less than 1 year ago
- 1-3 years ago
- 3-5 years ago
- 5-10 years ago
- More than 10 years ago
Right now, how connected do you feel to the (Replace with your organization name) alumni community?
In the last 12 months, which of these have you done?
- Attended an alumni event
- Donated money
- Volunteered time
- Mentored a current participant
- Referred someone to the program
- Followed or engaged with us on social media
How much do you agree with each statement about your experience?
- The program gave me skills I still use
- The program expanded my professional or personal network
- The program shaped my sense of purpose or values
- I still feel a sense of belonging to this community
Which of these alumni offerings would matter most to you if we brought them back or introduced them?
- Mentoring current program participants
- Networking events with fellow alumni
- A job or career opportunities board
- Skills workshops or webinars
- An annual reunion or gathering
- Regional or local alumni chapters
- An online community or discussion group
- Ways to donate or fundraise for the program
Anchor on the respondent's reported activity in the last 12 months and their connection rating. If they've stayed engaged, probe what specifically keeps them coming back and what would make them do even more. If they selected 'none' or rated connection low, dig into when and why they drifted — was it lack of relevant invitations, life circumstances, a bad past experience, or simply feeling forgotten — and what single thing might realistically pull them back in. Get one concrete story, not just a general impression.
How likely are you to recommend this program to someone considering applying?
If you were advising the alumni team on where to focus limited time and budget, how would you split 100 points across these areas?
- Career support and job connections
- Community-building events
- Fundraising and giving programs
- Mentorship pairing with current participants
- Communications and updates from the organization
What is one thing that would make you more likely to get involved with the program again in the next year?
What field or sector do you currently work in?
- Nonprofit / social sector
- Education
- Healthcare
- Business / corporate
- Government / public sector
- Self-employed / entrepreneur
- Prefer not to say
Which age range best describes you?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing your story with us! Your responses will be reviewed by the alumni engagement team to shape upcoming events, mentoring opportunities, and how we reach out to alumni going forward.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Segments respondents by time since program completion and by concrete engagement behaviors (volunteering, donating, event attendance, referrals) in the last 12 months, not just vague sentiment.
- Pairs a connection-strength rating and an agreement matrix with an AI follow-up interview that specifically anchors on the respondent's own reported activity and connection level to dig into why they're engaged or drifting.
- Uses a max-diff exercise and a constant-sum budget-allocation question to force real tradeoffs on which reengagement offerings and priorities actually matter, rather than letting everyone rate everything highly.
- Closes with an open-ended 'what would make you more involved' question plus firmographic/demographic classifiers (sector, age range) so the auto-generated report can segment findings by alumni type.
Jotform
Alumni Engagement Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use static form template covering general alumni engagement questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready out of the box but is a generic engagement questionnaire rather than one tuned to nonprofit program cohorts (fellowships, service corps, scholarships).
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template with Jotform's widely used drag-and-drop builder and broad integration ecosystem
- Easy to customize question wording and branding without technical setup
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up logic to probe why an alumnus feels connected or disengaged
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated analysis report
- No documented methodology or prompt transparency since there's no AI component
QuestionPro
Non Profit Alumni Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is explicitly framed for nonprofit alumni, making it the closest domain match, but it reads as a sample questionnaire/question bank rather than a single polished, fielding-ready survey flow. Good source of question ideas but likely needs assembly before deployment.
잘하는 점
- Nonprofit-specific framing that matches this audience (alumni of programs/organizations, not just schools)
- Question bank format gives breadth of sample items to borrow from
아쉬운 점
- Presented as a questionnaire/sample list rather than a single guided, ready-to-send survey experience
- No adaptive AI interviewing to follow up on individual answers about engagement drivers
- No automated report generation or response quality scoring built into the offering
SurveySparrow
Alumni Engagement Survey TemplateA conversational, chat-style survey template, but it's explicitly built 'for educational institutions' — i.e., school/university alumni — rather than nonprofit program cohorts like fellowships or leadership programs. Useful as a UX reference but a domain mismatch for nonprofit alumni programs.
잘하는 점
- Conversational chat-style UI that can feel more engaging than a plain form
- Purpose-built for education-sector alumni engagement use cases
아쉬운 점
- Designed for academic institutions, not nonprofit fellowships/service corps/scholarship programs, so question framing won't fit as-is
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasons behind engagement or drift
- No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated quality scoring, since there's no AI interviewing layer
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.