QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

AI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes

Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the AI in Coursework Survey. This survey explores how students use AI tools in their coursework, your views on academic integrity, and your preferences for institutional safeguards. • Your participation is entirely voluntary—you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers; we want your honest opinions. • All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • Results will be used to inform campus AI-use policies. • Estimated time: 6–8 minutes. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
의견 척도

How familiar are you with AI tools that can be used for learning or coursework?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q03
의견 척도

How concerned are you about AI-related academic integrity issues at your school?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q04
순위 매기기

Rank the following AI guardrails by importance to you (1 = most important).

  1. Require disclosure of AI use
  2. Allow AI for brainstorming with citation
  3. Redesign assignments to reduce copy-paste answers
  4. Use AI detection only as a flag with human review
  5. Limit AI on high-stakes or take-home exams
  6. Provide tutorials on ethical AI use
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
AI 인터뷰

Tell us more about your experience with AI tools in your coursework. What has worked well, and what challenges have you faced?

Q06
드롭다운

What is your current learner status?

  • High school student
  • Undergraduate student
  • Graduate student
  • Bootcamp or online program
  • Continuing education / professional development
  • Not currently enrolled (independent learner)
Q07
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help shape responsible AI policies in education. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.

Q08
객관식

Have you used any AI tool for coursework in the last 30 days?

  • Yes
  • No
Q09
장문형

Briefly describe any AI-related academic integrity situations you have observed or are concerned about.

Q10
의견 척도

How supportive are you of your school implementing formal AI-use guidelines for coursework?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all supportive최대:Extremely supportive
Q11
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI's role in your learning experience.

Q12
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • 16–17
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55+
Q13
객관식

Which AI tools have you used for coursework in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • ChatGPT / OpenAI
  • Google Gemini
  • Microsoft Copilot (Bing/Office)
  • Perplexity
  • Grammarly
  • Khanmigo
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Other
Q14
의견 척도

Overall, how do you view AI's role in learning?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Entirely a risk최대:Entirely a benefit
Q15
객관식

What would help you use AI responsibly in your coursework? Select all that apply.

  • Clear examples of allowed uses
  • Citation and disclosure guidelines
  • AI literacy workshop or module
  • Built-in AI in the LMS with guardrails
  • Office hours for AI questions
  • Course-specific AI instructions
  • Recommended safe tools list
  • Other
Q16
드롭다운

What is your primary field of study or focus?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Business & Management
  • Computer Science / IT
  • Data Science / Statistics
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Health & Medicine
  • Law / Public Policy
  • Natural Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Other
Q17
의견 척도

In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for researching or gathering information for coursework?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q18
의견 척도

If your school offered vetted AI tools with built-in guidelines, how likely would you be to use them?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q19
드롭다운

Which region do you primarily live in?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for writing, editing, or paraphrasing coursework?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q21
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for brainstorming or generating ideas?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Never최대:Very often

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Purpose-built for higher-education administrators and faculty, covering AI tool usage frequency, academic integrity concerns, and support for institutional AI-use guidelines — not just generic student data.
  • Includes a ranking question on AI guardrails and opinion-scale items on support for formal policies, giving administrators prioritized, policy-actionable data.
  • Combines an open-text integrity-incident question with an adaptive AI follow-up interview, letting the survey probe individual students' actual experiences with AI tools in coursework rather than stopping at closed-ended answers.
  • Ends with an auto-generated report design and demographic breakdowns (learner status, field of study, region, age) so results can be segmented by student population for policy targeting.

SurveySparrow

Student Information Collection Form Template

This is a basic student information/enrollment intake form, not a survey on AI attitudes or academic integrity. It's fielding-ready for collecting contact and enrollment details but has no content related to AI usage, integrity concerns, or policy attitudes. Useful only as a generic student-data collection reference, not a comparable attitudes study.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-field static form for basic student data collection
  • Likely simple to set up and customize for enrollment/contact fields
  • Fits general education-audience use case on the platform

아쉬운 점

  • No content addressing AI tool usage, integrity, or policy attitudes — wrong subject matter entirely
  • Static form fields only, no adaptive follow-up probing or AI interview capability
  • No automated quality scoring or per-response analysis of open-ended input

Typeform

Student Data Form

Another general-purpose student data collection form, likely aimed at capturing demographic or administrative details rather than measuring attitudes or behaviors. It shares an education audience with QuestionPunk's template but not the subject matter — there's no indication it addresses AI use, integrity, or institutional policy. Best viewed as a data-intake form rather than a research instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational form-fill experience typical of Typeform templates
  • Ready to deploy for straightforward student data intake
  • Likely mobile-friendly given Typeform's format

아쉬운 점

  • No coverage of AI tool usage, academic integrity, or policy attitudes topics
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice interview options for deeper qualitative insight
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기