Primary Trauma Exposure & Workplace Support Survey
For organizations in high-risk professions (first responders, healthcare, social services, journalism) to understand how often staff are directly exposed to traumatic events on the job and whether current support systems actually help. An AI follow-up interview explores what support was present or missing after a recent difficult incident, without asking anyone to relive graphic details.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 12 months, how often have you been directly exposed to a potentially traumatic event as part of your role (for example, witnessing death, serious injury, or violence)?
- Never
- Once or twice
- About monthly
- About weekly
- Almost daily
Which of these, if any, have you experienced directly in your role in the last 12 months? Select all that apply — no details needed.
- Death or serious injury
- Physical violence or threats to you
- Sustained verbal abuse or hostility
- A mass-casualty or large-scale disaster event
- Other
Lately, how much has this kind of exposure affected your ability to do your job effectively?
How much do you agree with each statement about support in your workplace?
- I have someone I can talk to after a difficult incident
- My supervisor checks in with me after critical incidents
- I know how to access mental health support through my employer
- I feel safe telling someone when an incident has affected me
Thinking about the most recent difficult incident you experienced at work, how would you rate the support you received afterward?
Which of these support resources have you actually used in the last 12 months?
- Employee assistance program / counseling benefit
- Peer support team
- Manager or supervisor check-ins
- External therapist or counselor
- Chaplaincy or spiritual care
Without asking for graphic details of the incident itself, explore what happened around the most recent difficult event the respondent flagged: who reached out afterward, what support (if any) actually helped, and what was missing or came too late. If they say support was good, probe what specifically made it work so it can be repeated elsewhere. If they say they've had no support, gently ask what would have made it easier to reach out, and remind them support resources are available without pressing further.
How confident do you feel in your ability to cope with future difficult events in this role?
Are you currently considering leaving this role or profession because of its emotional demands?
- Not at all
- Occasionally think about it
- Frequently think about it
- I've already decided to leave
What one change would most improve support for people in your role after a difficult incident?
How long have you been in a role with this kind of exposure?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10+ years
- Prefer not to say
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing this with us. Responses are combined into an aggregate report used to strengthen critical-incident support and staffing decisions — no individual answers are shared with your direct manager. If anything came up for you while answering, (Replace with your organization's EAP/crisis line) is available any time.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that explores what support was present or missing after a recent difficult incident, without requiring anyone to describe graphic details
- Combines structured exposure-frequency and support-usage questions (multiple-choice, matrix, rating, rating-scale) with open-ended follow-up so both patterns and lived experience are captured
- Directly asks about retention risk (considering leaving the role) and gathers a concrete improvement suggestion via long-text, giving organizations actionable output
- Closes with a transparent message explaining that responses are aggregated into a report, and is built for organizations to run themselves with automated per-response quality scoring rather than requiring a research team to hand-code results
QuestionPro
Primary Trauma Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and question bank for primary trauma exposure rather than a ready-to-field adaptive instrument. It's useful as a reference for question wording but appears to be a static list to copy into QuestionPro's survey builder. No mention of built-in interview-style follow-up on individual incidents.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with broad question-type library and reporting tools
- Provides sample question wording specific to primary trauma exposure, saving drafting time
- Likely supports standard skip logic and quantitative analysis dashboards
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe what support was present or missing after a specific incident
- Static question set means every respondent gets the same fixed items regardless of their answers
- No indication of per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
Jotform
Psychological Trauma Questionnaire Form TemplateA general psychological trauma intake form, more clinical/individual-assessment in framing than a workplace wellbeing check-in for high-risk professions. It's a form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, not a research instrument designed for organizational reporting. Good for basic intake but not tailored to occupational exposure or support-system evaluation.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Free-form template lowers the barrier to quickly assembling a basic trauma-related form
- Can integrate with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, etc.)
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive or voice AI interview component to explore incident context conversationally
- Not built specifically for high-risk occupational exposure or workplace support evaluation
- No automated aggregate reporting or per-response quality scoring geared toward organizational decision-making
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.