모든 템플릿

Senior Management Leadership Evaluation Survey

Gathers employee ratings of senior leadership on vision, decision-making, transparency, and accountability, plus behavioral data on how often leaders are visible day-to-day. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or moment that most shaped each person's confidence — surfacing concrete evidence behind the scores for HR and the executive team.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on senior management. Your answers are combined with others and used to help leadership improve — this takes about 5-6 minutes.

Q02
매트릭스필수

Thinking about senior management (not your direct manager), how would you rate them on each of the following?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Communicates a clear vision and strategy
  • Makes timely, well-reasoned decisions
  • Is transparent about company performance and challenges
  • Holds itself accountable for results
  • Supports employee growth and development
  • 외 1개
: Poor · Fair · Good · Very Good · Excellent
Q03
의견 척도필수

Based on what you've seen in the last 6 months, how confident are you that senior management can successfully lead the organization through its next major challenge?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q04
평점 척도필수

How much do you trust senior management's decisions to be in the best interest of employees, not just shareholders or short-term results?

범위: 15
최소:No trust at all최대:Complete trust
Q05
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often did you have any direct interaction with a member of senior management (town halls, Q&As, skip-level meetings, etc.)?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • About monthly
  • Weekly or more often
Q06
순위 매기기

If senior management could improve in only one area over the next year, rank these from most to least important to you.

  1. Communication and transparency
  2. Strategic vision and direction
  3. Speed and quality of decision-making
  4. Accountability for results
  5. Employee development and growth opportunities
  6. Collaboration across departments
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
객관식필수

Do you feel senior management genuinely listens to feedback from employees below the executive level?

  • Yes, consistently
  • Sometimes, depends on the topic
  • Rarely
  • No, not at all
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's confidence and trust ratings for senior management. Ask them to describe one specific decision, announcement, or action by senior leadership in the last year that most shaped their view, and walk through what happened and why it mattered to them. If their confidence rating is low, press gently on what specifically would need to change for it to improve; if it's high, ask what leadership behavior they most want to see continue. Avoid letting them stay abstract — anchor every answer to a concrete example.

Q09
장문형

Is there anything senior management should start, stop, or continue doing that hasn't come up yet?

Q10
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your current role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
단문형

What department or team are you part of? (Optional — helps us spot patterns, not to identify you.)

Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your candor. Responses are aggregated into a leadership feedback report shared with HR and senior management to guide development priorities; individual answers are kept confidential.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static rating scales with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific decision or moment behind each person's confidence and trust scores, giving HR concrete evidence instead of just numbers.
  • Combines quantitative measures (matrix ratings, opinion scale, trust rating, ranking of priority improvement areas) with behavioral frequency data on leader visibility, so results aren't purely perception-based.
  • Includes a long-text start/stop/continue question and role-level/tenure/department breakdowns, allowing HR to segment findings by group while still respecting anonymity.
  • Closes with a clear, transparent message about how responses are aggregated, and the whole flow builds toward an auto-generated report rather than a raw export.

QuestionPro

Top 7 Management Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is primarily an educational guide listing sample management evaluation questions rather than a ready-to-field survey. It gives a helpful starting question set but leaves design, logic, and follow-up entirely to the user. Good for inspiration, not for launching a structured evaluation program.

잘하는 점

  • Offers a curated list of common management evaluation question types as a reference
  • Backed by a large established survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Useful starting point for teams drafting their own questionnaire from scratch

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind any given rating
  • Static question list with no built-in per-response quality scoring or automated report generation
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how or why each question was asked

Typeform

Leadership Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready template with Typeform's signature conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface, which likely makes it pleasant to complete. It's built around fixed questions and branching logic rather than open-ended probing, so it captures surface-level ratings well but not the reasoning behind them.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that boosts completion rates
  • Easy to customize question wording and branch logic within Typeform's builder
  • Established platform with reliable delivery and basic analytics

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to dig into the specific moment shaping an employee's confidence
  • Relies on static logic branching rather than true dynamic follow-up questioning, and lacks automated quality scoring on individual responses
  • No published prompt-level transparency or auto-generated executive report comparable to QuestionPunk's output

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.