QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Business Continuity Plan Readiness Assessment

Assesses how prepared an organization is to keep operating through IT outages, cyberattacks, natural disasters, and other disruptions — covering plan documentation, testing cadence, employee clarity, and priority functions. Built for risk, operations, and IT leaders benchmarking continuity maturity, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs how the plan actually performed during a recent real disruption or near-miss.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to assess your organization's business continuity readiness. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This covers your current plan, how well it's been tested, and where the gaps are. About 6-8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Does your organization currently have a documented business continuity plan?

  • Yes, fully documented and up to date
  • Yes, but outdated or incomplete
  • No, but we're developing one
  • No, not in place
  • Not sure
Q03
매트릭스필수

How prepared is your organization to maintain operations through each of the following disruptions?

6개 행 × 4개 열
  • IT system outage
  • Natural disaster (fire, flood, storm)
  • Supply chain disruption
  • Cyberattack or ransomware
  • Loss of key personnel
  • 외 1개
열: Not prepared · Somewhat prepared · Well prepared · Fully prepared
Q04
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that leadership could execute the continuity plan effectively during an actual disruption?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q05
객관식

When was your business continuity plan last tested (for example, through a tabletop exercise or live drill)?

  • Within the last 6 months
  • 6-12 months ago
  • 1-2 years ago
  • More than 2 years ago
  • Never tested
  • Not sure
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of the following business functions should be prioritized for continuity protection?

  • IT systems and data
  • Customer-facing operations
  • Supply chain and vendor relationships
  • Physical facilities and equipment
  • Payroll and HR operations
  • Internal and external communications
  • Financial operations
  • Sales and revenue generation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest priority최악:Lowest priority
Q07
평점 척도필수

How clear are employees on their individual roles and responsibilities during a disruption?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not clear at all최대:Completely clear
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the most recent actual disruption or near-miss the respondent's organization experienced (IT outage, weather event, cyber incident, key staff loss, etc.): what happened, which parts of the continuity plan were activated, what worked, and what broke down or was missing entirely. If they say they've never had a real disruption, probe what worries them most about how the current plan would hold up and why.

Q09
객관식

What is the biggest barrier to improving your business continuity plan right now?

  • Budget constraints
  • Lack of time
  • Limited leadership buy-in
  • Lack of internal expertise
  • Uncertainty about where to start
Q10
숫자

Approximately how many hours could your organization sustain critical operations without core systems (power, IT, communications) before significant financial or reputational harm occurs?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role or department?

  • Executive leadership
  • IT or security
  • Operations
  • Risk or compliance
  • Human resources
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How many employees does your organization have?

  • Under 50
  • 50-249
  • 250-999
  • 1,000-4,999
  • 5,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will feed into a readiness report highlighting where your continuity plan is solid and where it needs attention.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a static checklist with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs how the plan actually performed during a recent real disruption or near-miss, surfacing details a form can't capture
  • Combines structured measurement (matrix on operational readiness, MaxDiff on function prioritization, rating on employee role clarity) with open-ended probing in one flow
  • Includes quantitative benchmarking questions — confidence in leadership execution, hours of sustainable operation, last test date — alongside qualitative depth
  • Ends in an auto-generated report built from transparent, reviewable prompts, so risk/ops/IT leaders can see exactly how conclusions were derived

Jotform

Business Continuity Plan Checklist Template

This is a checklist-style form template rather than an interview or maturity assessment — it's built to confirm whether continuity tasks/items exist, not to probe how plans perform in practice. Useful for quick internal audits but not designed for benchmarking or narrative reconstruction of incidents. Good starting point for teams wanting a simple, fielding-ready static form.

잘하는 점

  • Simple, ready-to-use checklist format that's fast to deploy
  • Familiar Jotform builder with drag-and-drop customization and integrations
  • Free to start, low setup effort for basic compliance tracking

아쉬운 점

  • Static checklist with no adaptive follow-up — can't dig into why a plan failed or how a real disruption unfolded
  • No automated quality scoring of open responses or maturity benchmarking logic
  • No transparent methodology or generated readiness report tied to responses

SurveySparrow

Business Continuity Plan Template

A conversational-style survey template covering business continuity topics, fielding-ready within SurveySparrow's platform. It offers a more engaging respondent experience than a plain form but relies on fixed question paths rather than true adaptive probing. Works for structured feedback collection but not for reconstructing incident-specific detail.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational UI that improves completion rates versus static forms
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up questions — branching is pre-set, not generated from the respondent's actual answer
  • No per-response quality scoring or voice-based interview option
  • No mechanism to reconstruct a specific recent disruption in narrative detail

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기