QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Customer Service Representative Evaluation Survey

Measures how a specific customer service interaction went — channel used, resolution outcome, and how the representative came across on knowledge, courtesy, and communication — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what happened during the interaction when something went wrong. Built for support and CX teams scoring individual reps or interactions.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a moment to tell us about your recent customer service experience! This helps us coach and recognize our team. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It'll take about 7 minutes, and your honest feedback — good or bad — is exactly what we need.

Q02
객관식필수

How did you contact customer service for this interaction?

  • Phone
  • Live chat
  • Email
  • Social media
  • In person
  • Mobile app
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied were you with the representative who helped you?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
매트릭스필수

How would you rate the representative on each of the following?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Knowledge of your issue or product
  • Courtesy and friendliness
  • Clarity of communication
  • Speed in addressing your request
  • Ownership of the problem until it was handled
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
객관식필수

Was your issue resolved during this interaction?

  • Yes, fully resolved
  • Partially resolved
  • Not resolved
  • It wasn't an issue that needed resolving
Q06
의견 척도필수

Based on this interaction, how likely are you to recommend our company to a friend or colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct exactly what happened in this interaction: what the customer needed, how the representative responded, and the specific moment that drove the satisfaction score they gave. If the issue was partially resolved or not resolved, dig into what the representative said or did (or didn't do), whether they set expectations about next steps, and what a fully resolved outcome would have looked like. If satisfaction was high, pin down the one thing the representative did that made the biggest difference so it can be reinforced with the team.

Q08
객관식

How long did it take to get your issue addressed, from first contact to resolution (or the point you gave up)?

  • Under 5 minutes
  • 5-15 minutes
  • 15-30 minutes
  • More than 30 minutes
  • Still unresolved
Q09
장문형

Is there anything else about this interaction — good or bad — you'd like us to know?

Q10
객관식

Which age range best describes you?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
Q11
객관식

How would you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback is routed directly into representative coaching and recognition, and never affects your account or support access.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Captures the full interaction context — channel used, resolution outcome, and time-to-resolution — alongside satisfaction and likelihood-to-recommend scores
  • Includes a matrix question scoring the representative specifically on knowledge, courtesy, and communication, not just overall satisfaction
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened in the interaction when something went wrong, going beyond a static open-text box
  • Pairs quantitative rep scoring with open-ended feedback and demographic questions, giving CX teams both structured metrics and qualitative detail for coaching

QuestionPro

Customer Service Representative Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This page is framed largely as a questions guide with a sample questionnaire attached, rather than a single ready-to-field survey. It covers similar ground — rep evaluation dimensions and resolution — but leans more educational than QuestionPunk's structured template.

잘하는 점

  • Provides sample question wording and guidance for building a rep evaluation survey
  • Backed by an established, full-featured survey platform with broad question-type support

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a static questionnaire/guide rather than an adaptive interview experience
  • No mechanism for reconstructing what happened in a specific negative interaction beyond a text comment

Jotform

Customer Service Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, geared toward quick deployment and design flexibility. It's a static evaluation form rather than a conversational or adaptive survey experience.

잘하는 점

  • Easy visual customization via Jotform's form builder
  • Quick to deploy as a standalone web form or embed

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up when a response indicates a problem
  • No voice interview option or automated per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Customer Service Survey Template (With Questions)

A standard, methodologically-informed template from an established survey platform, with pre-written questions for gauging customer service quality. It's a fixed-format questionnaire without any conversational or adaptive component.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics/reporting tools
  • Pre-written questions designed with general survey best practices in mind

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into what specifically happened during a poor interaction
  • No voice interview mode or transparent, inspectable AI prompt logic

SurveySparrow

Customer Service Feedback Survey Template

SurveySparrow offers a conversational-style survey template, which reads more naturally than a typical form, but the flow is still a pre-set sequence of questions rather than a dynamic interview. It's a reasonable option for teams wanting a chat-like feel without true adaptive branching.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style question flow that feels more engaging than a plain form
  • Template geared toward marketing/CX teams collecting service feedback

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI probing — question sequence is still fixed, not dynamically generated per response
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses or transparent prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기