Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Classroom Observation and Coaching Feedback Survey
A structured post-lesson observation form for instructional coaches, administrators, and peer observers to rate teaching practices, student engagement, and instructional strategy — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moments behind the ratings so feedback is concrete enough to coach from.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
단문형필수
What grade level and subject was observed (e.g., '7th grade math')?
Q03
매트릭스필수
Rate what you observed for each of the following teaching practices during this lesson.
5개 행 × 4개 열
- Classroom management and routines
- Lesson pacing
- Checking for student understanding
- Student engagement strategies
- Differentiation for diverse learners
열: Not observed · Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q04
의견 척도필수
Overall, how effectively did this lesson meet its stated learning objective?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Objective was not met최대:Objective was fully met
Q05
평점 척도필수
How would you rate student engagement during the lesson overall?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Mostly disengaged최대:Highly engaged
Q06
객관식필수
Which instructional format dominated the majority of the lesson?
- Whole-class lecture/direct instruction
- Small group or partner work
- Class discussion or Socratic seminar
- Independent seatwork
- Technology-based or self-paced activity
Q07
순위 매기기필수
Rank these areas from most to least in need of coaching focus for this teacher, based on what you observed.
- Questioning techniques
- Time management and pacing
- Differentiation
- Behavior/classroom management
- Use of formative assessment
- Student voice and participation
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct the moment that most drove the overall effectiveness rating: ask the observer to describe what specifically happened, what the teacher and students were doing, and why it stood out. Also probe for the single most engaging moment and the single least engaging moment of the lesson with concrete detail. If the observer flagged a low-scoring practice in the ratings, ask what coaching support or resource would most directly address it.
Q09
장문형필수
Describe one specific strength you observed, with a concrete example (what the teacher said or did, and how students responded).
Q10
장문형필수
Describe one growth area you observed and one specific, actionable next step the teacher could try.
Q11
객관식
What is your role relative to this classroom?
- Peer teacher
- Instructional coach
- School administrator
- Department head
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
How many years have you worked in education?
- Less than 2 years
- 2-5 years
- 6-10 years
- 11-20 years
- More than 20 years
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
Thank you for this observation! Your ratings and notes will be compiled into a feedback summary shared with the teacher to support their next coaching conversation.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a matrix rating of specific teaching practices plus an overall opinion-scale effectiveness rating and a student engagement rating, giving both granular and summary scores in one form
- Pairs a ranking question (coaching-focus priority areas) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual classroom moment behind the overall rating, turning a static score into a specific, coachable example
- Two structured long-text prompts require observers to name a concrete strength with an example and a growth area with an actionable next step, so feedback isn't vague
- Captures observer context (role, years in education) and lesson context (grade/subject, instructional format) so ratings can be filtered and compared across observers and classrooms
Jotform
Tier 1 Classroom Observation Form TemplateA fielding-ready static form for structured classroom observation, likely built around a specific tiered observation rubric. It covers standard rating fields but has no mechanism to probe further into why a rating was given. Best suited for compliance-style documentation rather than deep coaching conversations.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use template aligned to a named observation tier/rubric
- Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy customization of fields
- Supports standard form logic and file/photo attachments common to Jotform forms
아쉬운 점
- Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up to reconstruct the specific moment behind a score
- No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated coaching report
SurveySparrow
Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary LevelsA conversational-style survey template scoped specifically to elementary classrooms, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel less clinical. It's a ready-to-field template but appears narrowly targeted to elementary levels rather than general K-12 or subject-specific coaching. No indication it supports follow-up probing beyond preset questions.
잘하는 점
- Conversational UI can make observation forms feel quicker to fill out
- Template is explicitly tailored to elementary classroom contexts
- Likely supports SurveySparrow's standard reporting/dashboard views
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific rating
- No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
- No transparent, published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.