모든 템플릿

Outage Notification & ETA Accuracy Satisfaction Survey

Measures residential utility customer satisfaction with outage notifications, estimated restoration time accuracy, and communication channel preferences. Designed for utility providers seeking to identify communication gaps and prioritize improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for your interest in this survey. We are conducting research about experiences with power outage notifications and estimated restoration times over the past 12 months. Please answer based on your primary energy provider. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.

Q02
객관식

In the past 12 months, did you experience any power outages at your residence?

  • Yes, at least one
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
드롭다운

Approximately how many separate power outages did you experience in the past 12 months?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3–4
  • 5–7
  • 8–10
  • More than 10
Q04
객관식

Which of the following channels did you receive outage notifications from? Please select all that apply.

  • SMS/text message
  • Email
  • Mobile app push notification
  • Automated phone call/IVR
  • Utility website/status page
  • Social media
  • In-person door tag or letter
  • I did not receive any notifications
Q05
의견 척도

Thinking about the most recent outage notification you received, how would you rate its timeliness?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely untimely최대:Extremely timely
Q06
객관식

Compared with the estimated time of restoration (ETR) you received, the actual restoration was…

  • Much earlier than stated
  • Slightly earlier than stated
  • About what was stated
  • Slightly later than stated
  • Much later than stated
  • I did not receive an ETR
Q07
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with how your utility provider communicates during outages?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q08
드롭다운

For planned outages, how much advance notice would you prefer from your utility provider?

  • Same day (less than 4 hours)
  • Same day (4–12 hours)
  • Day before (12–24 hours)
  • 2–3 days before
  • 4–7 days before
  • More than a week before
  • I don't need advance notice
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience with outage notifications and estimated restoration times.

Q10
객관식

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to help improve outage communication practices.

Q12
객관식

Which single channel would you most prefer for receiving outage updates?

  • SMS/text message
  • Email
  • Mobile app push notification
  • Automated phone call/IVR
  • Utility website/status page
  • Social media
  • Other (please specify)
  • No preference
Q13
의견 척도

How would you rate the clarity of that notification?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q14
객관식

During your most recent outage, how frequently were the estimated restoration times updated?

  • No updates after the first estimate
  • Updated once during the outage
  • Updated every few hours
  • Updated hourly or more frequently
  • I did not receive an estimate
Q15
의견 척도

How confident are you that future estimated restoration times from your provider will be accurate?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q16
순위 매기기

Please rank the following by importance for improving outage communications, where 1 = most important.

  1. More accurate estimated restoration times
  2. More frequent updates during outages
  3. Clearer cause-of-outage and crew status information
  4. Earlier proactive notifications before outages
  5. Reliable delivery on my preferred channel
  6. Interactive outage map with live status
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q17
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도

How would you rate the usefulness of the information provided in that notification?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q19
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend your utility provider to a friend or neighbor based on their outage communication?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q20
드롭다운

Which country or region do you live in?

  • United States
  • Canada
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • Other (please specify)
Q21
객관식

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Rural
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Purpose-built for utility outage communication, covering notification receipt, channel preferences, ETR accuracy, and clarity/usefulness ratings rather than generic satisfaction questions
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that lets customers elaborate on their outage experience in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
  • Combines opinion-scale, ranking, and dropdown question types to capture both quantitative satisfaction scores and prioritized improvement areas (e.g., ranking communication improvements, advance notice preferences)
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean utility teams get structured, ready-to-use findings without manual analysis

Jotform

200+ Customer Satisfaction Evaluation Forms

This is a broad category page listing many generic customer satisfaction form templates rather than a single fielding-ready survey, and none are specific to utility outage communication. Useful as a form-building starting point but requires significant customization for outage/ETR-specific research.

잘하는 점

  • Large library of customizable form templates across many use cases
  • Drag-and-drop form builder likely included for quick edits

아쉬운 점

  • No utility-outage or ETR-specific questions; would need to be built from scratch
  • Static form fields only, no adaptive AI follow-up probing into open-ended feedback
  • No transparent, publishable methodology or prompt logic for how responses are interpreted

QuestionPro

Customer satisfaction survey questions | Customer satisfaction survey example

A generic customer satisfaction survey template with example questions, not tailored to outage notifications, ETR accuracy, or utility communication channels. It offers a solid general CSAT starting point but lacks domain-specific structure.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with reporting and analytics tools
  • Provides example questions to help users draft their own satisfaction survey

아쉬운 점

  • No outage-specific or ETR accuracy questions built in
  • Fixed-format questions only; no adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up
  • No disclosed per-response scoring methodology

SurveyMonkey

Customer Satisfaction Survey Template

A ready-to-use general CSAT template from a well-known survey platform, but it is generic and not designed for utility outage notification or restoration-time accuracy research. Teams would need to substantially rewrite questions for this use case.

잘하는 점

  • Quick deployment via a widely used, reputable survey platform
  • Standard CSAT question set and basic analytics dashboard

아쉬운 점

  • No coverage of outage notification channels, ETR accuracy, or advance-notice preferences
  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on individual responses
  • No transparent prompt/methodology documentation for how open responses are analyzed

SurveySparrow

FREE Customer Satisfaction Survey Template

A free, generic customer satisfaction template aimed at general business use, not utility-specific outage or ETR research. It provides a conversational survey format but omits the domain-specific structure this topic requires.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format may improve completion rates
  • Free template offering lowers barrier to entry

아쉬운 점

  • No outage notification, ETR accuracy, or channel-preference questions included
  • No adaptive AI or voice-based interview capability for deeper follow-up
  • No published scoring rubric or prompt transparency for response evaluation

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.