DevOps Reliability & Incident Response Assessment
Benchmarks uptime, incident response, on-call burden, error handling, and SLA priorities across engineering teams. Designed for SREs, DevOps engineers, and software developers managing production systems.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How often does your team deploy changes to production?
- Multiple times per day
- Daily
- Weekly
- Every 2 to 4 weeks
- Monthly or less
In the past 30 days, approximately how many user-impacting incidents did your team handle?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- More than 20
In the past 90 days, how often has your team experienced cascading failures or dependent-service outages?
How confident are you that error handling is robust across your team's critical user and system paths today?
Rank the following SLA/SLO dimensions by importance to your team, from most to least important.
- Availability (uptime %)
- Request latency targets
- Error rate / error budget
- Data freshness or latency targets
- Recovery time objective (RTO)
- Recovery point objective (RPO)
We'd like to explore your reliability and SLA experiences in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
If you could trade performance or features for greater stability, what would you change first, and why?
What is your primary role?
- Software engineer (IC)
- Tech lead / Engineering manager
- SRE / DevOps / Platform engineer
- Data / ML engineer
- QA / Testing
- Architect
- Product manager
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey! Your input will help prioritize the reliability outcomes that matter most to engineering teams. All results will be reported in aggregate only.
Are you currently part of an on-call rotation for production services?
- Yes
- No
In the past 30 days, approximately how many pages or high-priority alerts did you personally receive?
- 0
- 1–5
- 6–15
- 16–30
- 31–60
- More than 60
In the past 90 days, how often has your team experienced degraded response times or latency spikes noticeable to users?
Overall, how useful are your production alerts during incidents?
How well does your team currently meet its primary SLA/SLO targets?
How many years of professional software experience do you have?
- 0–1
- 2–4
- 5–9
- 10–14
- 15+
Rank the following on-call pain points from most to least painful.
- Noisy or low-signal alerts
- Runbook gaps or outdated steps
- Slow debugging due to limited traces/logs
- Flaky deployments or rollbacks
- Third-party instability
In the past 90 days, how often has your team experienced deployment rollbacks or failed releases?
Please describe the most important error-handling gap you noticed in the past 90 days. What was its impact, and how was it addressed (if at all)?
Approximately how large is your company?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
In the past 90 days, how often has your team experienced data inconsistencies or silent failures?
Which industry best describes your organization?
- SaaS / B2B software
- Consumer internet
- Financial services / Fintech
- Healthcare / Life sciences
- Gaming
- Media / Entertainment
- Retail / E-commerce
- Industrial / IoT
- Government / Public sector
- Other
Where are you primarily located?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East / Africa
What is the typical size of the team responsible for your primary service or system?
- 1–3
- 4–7
- 8–15
- 16+
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond single-incident logging to benchmark team-wide reliability patterns: deployment frequency, on-call rotation status, 30-day incident and page/alert counts, and ranked on-call pain points.
- Uses opinion-scale questions to quantify 90-day frequency of cascading failures, degraded response times, rollbacks, and data inconsistencies, plus confidence in error handling and usefulness of alerts.
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes reliability and SLA experiences in more depth, alongside open-text questions on error-handling gaps and stability trade-offs.
- Captures ranked SLA/SLO priorities and role/company demographics (role, experience, company size, industry, location, team size), with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report — available on our free tier or $50/mo Business plan.
SurveySparrow
Manage IT Incident Reporting with Software Incident Report FormA conversational-style form for logging individual software incidents as they occur, not a broader survey benchmarking team reliability practices or SLA priorities. It's a fielding-ready template, but scoped to single-incident capture rather than aggregate assessment across engineers.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time format that SurveySparrow is known for
- Quick to deploy for capturing individual incident details
- Likely integrates with SurveySparrow's broader survey/workflow tools
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe deeper into root causes or reliability practices
- No ranking or opinion-scale structure to benchmark on-call burden or SLA priorities across a team
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
Typeform
Software Incident Report Form TemplateA polished, static form for reporting a single software incident, useful for intake/logging but not designed to assess on-call burden, cascading failure frequency, or SLA/SLO priorities across a team. It's a ready-to-use template, but narrower in scope than a full reliability assessment.
잘하는 점
- Clean, mobile-friendly interface typical of Typeform
- Conditional logic support for routing incident details
- Easy to embed in internal tools or ticketing workflows
아쉬운 점
- No voice AI or adaptive AI interview component to explore incident context beyond fixed fields
- No mechanism for benchmarking recurring patterns (cascading failures, rollback frequency) over a time window
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated report synthesis
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.