QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Agile Sprint Retrospective Feedback Survey

Captures how a development team felt about the sprint that just ended — goal completion, planning accuracy, collaboration, and workload sustainability — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind blockers and missed goals instead of the sanitized version teams give in stand-up.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes for this sprint retrospective! Your honest input helps the team improve how we plan and work together. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with how this sprint went?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q03
객관식필수

Did the team complete the sprint goal?

  • Yes, fully
  • Mostly, with minor gaps
  • Partially
  • No, we missed it significantly
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this sprint?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Sprint planning estimates were realistic
  • Blockers were identified and resolved quickly
  • Communication within the team was clear
  • Work was distributed fairly across the team
  • Requirements were clear before we started
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Looking at this sprint, which factors helped progress the most, and which hurt it the most?

  • Clear requirements going in
  • Daily stand-ups
  • Pairing or code review support
  • Tooling / CI-CD reliability
  • Cross-team dependencies
  • Mid-sprint scope changes
  • Meeting load
  • Documentation quality
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Helped most최악:Hurt most
Q06
평점 척도필수

How sustainable was the pace of work this sprint?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not sustainable, we were stretched thin최대:Very sustainable
Q07
단문형

In one sentence, what was the single biggest blocker this sprint?

Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the real story behind this sprint's outcome. If the goal was missed or only partially met, find out at what point it became clear it was at risk and whether that was raised early or discovered late. Anchor on their stated biggest blocker and any low agreement/disagreement ratings from the sprint statements, and ask what would need to change next sprint to prevent the same issue. If they rated the sprint highly across the board, ask what specifically the team should keep doing.

Q09
의견 척도필수

How confident are you in the plan for next sprint?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q10
객관식

What is your role on this team?

  • Engineer / Developer
  • QA / Test
  • Product Manager
  • Designer
  • Scrum Master / Team Lead
  • Other
Q11
객관식

How long have you been on this team?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed directly into the team's retrospective discussion and next sprint's planning.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that probes the real story behind missed or partially completed goals, going beyond the surface-level answer given in stand-up
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scale for satisfaction, rating for pace sustainability, matrix for agreement statements, max diff for what helped vs. hurt progress) with open-ended short text on blockers
  • Segments respondents by role and tenure on the team, so retro feedback can be analyzed by context (e.g., new joiners vs. veterans)
  • Closes with an automated report generation step so the team retro data feeds directly into a usable summary rather than raw spreadsheet exports

SurveyMonkey

Sprint Retrospective Questions Template

A ready-to-field template with a preset list of sprint retrospective questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It's a static question set aimed at general survey builders rather than one designed specifically for agile teams' nuanced blocker/goal-completion dynamics. No mention of any conversational or adaptive follow-up capability.

잘하는 점

  • Mature, well-known survey platform with broad distribution options
  • Built-in analytics and reporting dashboard
  • Simple to deploy quickly for teams already using SurveyMonkey

아쉬운 점

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe missed goals or blockers further
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored

Jotform

Agile Retrospective Form Template

A drag-and-drop form template positioned within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, useful for quickly customizing field types and layout. It reads as a form-building starting point rather than a purpose-built research instrument with scoring or analysis logic. No indication of any AI-driven interviewing or automated quality scoring of responses.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Easy integration with other Jotform workflows and apps
  • Free tier available for basic form usage

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig past sanitized stand-up answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • Static form fields only, with no follow-up logic tied to specific answers like missed sprint goals

Typeform

Retrospective Survey Template

A conversational-style, one-question-at-a-time survey template that offers a more engaging respondent experience than a traditional form. However, the flow is still pre-scripted rather than dynamically generated, and the page doesn't indicate any capability to ask context-aware follow-up questions based on a given answer. It's a general retrospective template, not one tailored to sprint-specific concepts like planning accuracy or velocity.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
  • Simple template structure that's easy to brand and customize
  • Established platform with broad integrations

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to probe blockers in depth
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • No transparent published prompts or methodology behind question design

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기