Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Actor Audition Experience Feedback Survey
Captures how actors experienced your casting process — clarity of materials, professionalism in the room, and fairness of communication — for casting directors and production teams who want to protect their reputation with talent. The AI follow-up digs into the single best or worst moment of the audition to find out exactly what happened and why.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식
How did you find out about this audition?
- Talent agent or manager
- Casting website/breakdown service
- Direct submission
- Referral from another actor
- Other
Q03
객관식필수
Which best describes the format of this audition?
- In-person initial audition
- Self-tape submission
- Live virtual/video call
- In-person callback
- Other
Q04
의견 척도필수
How clear and complete were the audition materials (sides, character breakdown, self-tape instructions) provided beforehand?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q05
매트릭스필수
Rate the following aspects of your audition day.
5개 행 × 5개 열
- Started on/near the scheduled time
- Direction or adjustments given in the room
- Respect shown for your time
- Professionalism of casting staff
- Comfort of the waiting area/environment
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q06
평점 척도
How would you rate the clarity of any direction or adjustments given to you during the audition?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Confusing최대:Crystal clear
Q07
객관식필수
Before you left (or logged off), did you receive a clear sense of next steps?
- Yes, a clear timeline for callbacks/decision
- A vague mention with no timeline
- No mention of next steps at all
Q08
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend auditioning for this casting team or production to another actor?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct the single most positive or most frustrating moment of this audition experience for the respondent — what specifically happened, who was involved, and how it affected their performance or morale. If they rated 'respect for time' or 'clarity of next steps' low in the matrix or multiple-choice question, probe exactly what went wrong and what they wish had happened instead. If everything was rated highly, probe what specifically stood out as exceptional so it can be repeated for other actors.
Q10
장문형
If you could change one thing about how this audition was run, what would it be?
Q11
객관식
How many years have you been auditioning professionally?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
What is your union status?
- SAG-AFTRA/union member
- Not currently union
- Other union
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your responses are reviewed as a batch to improve scheduling, communication, and the in-room experience for every actor who auditions with us.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the single best or worst moment of the audition, uncovering exactly what happened and why rather than leaving it to a blank comment box.
- Combines structured ratings (opinion scales, a matrix on audition-day aspects, a rating on direction clarity) with open-ended reflection so casting teams get both benchmarkable scores and rich context.
- Segments respondents by years auditioning professionally and union status, letting production teams see if experience level or union standing shapes perceptions of fairness or professionalism.
- Closes with a clear next-steps check and a likelihood-to-recommend question, giving casting directors a direct read on reputational risk with talent.
Jotform
Acting Audition Form TemplateThis is a static intake/submission form for actors applying to or scheduling an audition, not a post-audition feedback survey. It's fielding-ready and customizable within Jotform's builder, but it's built to collect actor details rather than to gauge how the audition experience actually felt. Casting teams would need to build a separate feedback flow to capture talent sentiment.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use, customizable form builder with drag-and-drop fields
- Familiar Jotform ecosystem (file uploads, e-signatures, integrations) useful for collecting headshots/resumes
- Free to start, widely used by casting offices
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe a specific moment or complaint
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated experience reporting
- Not designed to measure post-audition fairness/professionalism sentiment — it's an intake form, not a feedback instrument
Typeform
Acting Audition FormTypeform's version is also oriented around collecting audition submissions or applications in a conversational, one-question-at-a-time format, rather than surveying talent about how an audition day went. It's a polished, fielding-ready form, but it doesn't address clarity, professionalism, or fairness of the casting process. Any follow-up on a specific answer would require manual logic branching, not true adaptive questioning.
잘하는 점
- Clean, conversational UI that likely improves completion rates for actor submissions
- Easy embedding and sharing, consistent with Typeform's brand
- Logic-jump branching for basic conditional paths
아쉬운 점
- No AI-driven follow-up interview — branching logic is manually authored, not adaptive to open-text answers
- No voice interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated experience report; results would need manual review
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.