Mid-Year Performance Review Pulse Survey
Captures how employees see their progress at the midpoint of the year — goal status, manager support, obstacles, and priorities for the second half — so managers and HR can course-correct before year-end reviews lock in. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind each person's progress rating and top obstacle instead of just the label they picked.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which best describes your progress toward the goals you set at the start of this review period?
- Ahead of schedule
- On track
- Slightly behind
- Significantly behind
- My goals changed or are no longer relevant
How confident are you that you'll hit your year-end goals if things continue at the current pace?
Thinking about this review period so far, how much do you agree with each statement about the support you've received?
- My manager set clear expectations for my goals this period.
- I received timely, specific feedback on my work.
- I had the resources or tools I needed to do my job well.
- My contributions were recognized appropriately.
What has been the single biggest obstacle to your progress this period?
- Unclear or shifting priorities
- Competing demands on my time
- Lack of resources or tools
- Limited support from my manager
- Team or staffing changes
- Gaps in my own skills or experience
- No major obstacle this period
If you could get more of any of these for the second half of the year, which would help most and which would help least?
- More frequent one-on-one check-ins
- Clearer goal-setting for the second half
- Additional training or skill development
- More recognition for completed work
- Better cross-team collaboration
- More flexible deadlines
- Career development conversations
- Additional staffing or resources
Rank these in order of what matters most to you for the rest of the year (top = most important).
- Delivering my current projects on time
- Developing new skills
- Improving collaboration with my team
- Taking on a stretch assignment
- Improving my work-life balance
- Preparing for a promotion or new role
Reconstruct the concrete story behind the respondent's progress rating and the obstacle they selected: ask for a specific recent example, what they tried, and what actually got in the way. If they said they're 'on track' or picked 'no major obstacle,' probe what specifically is working so it can be replicated for others. If they flagged a manager-support gap, ask what one change from their manager in the next 90 days would make the biggest difference.
How valuable was your most recent conversation with your manager about your mid-year progress?
Is there anything else you'd like your manager or HR to know before your formal mid-year review conversation?
Which department are you part of? (Template note: replace these placeholder options with your organization's actual department list before launching.)
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- 5+ years
- Prefer not to say
Thanks for the honest input! Your answers will be aggregated with your team's and shared (anonymized where possible) with HR and your manager to help shape your mid-year review conversation and second-half priorities.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond the progress-rating multiple choice with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the real story behind each person's rating and their stated top obstacle, instead of leaving it as an unexplained label.
- Combines structured signal (opinion scale on year-end confidence, matrix agreement statements, max-diff and ranking on second-half priorities) with open qualitative depth, so HR gets both the 'what' and the 'why' in one pass.
- Captures manager-relationship health directly via a dedicated rating question on the value of the last mid-year conversation, plus a long-text field for anything respondents want HR to know before formal reviews lock in.
- Produces an automated report from the responses, with transparent prompts showing exactly how the AI follow-up probed each answer — no black-box scoring.
Jotform
Mid Year Performance Review Form TemplateA ready-to-field static form template for mid-year reviews, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's suited for structured ratings and comments rather than exploratory conversation, and customization means editing fixed fields, not adaptive questioning.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template with Jotform's familiar drag-and-drop editor
- Easy to customize form fields and branding
- Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form/e-signature ecosystem
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe behind a rating or obstacle selection
- No voice AI interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Sample Mid-Year Performance Review Template | For Employee EvaluationSurveySparrow offers a conversational-style survey template for mid-year evaluations, presenting one question at a time in a chat-like interface. The conversational format is a UI style, not an AI that adaptively interviews respondents based on their specific answers.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style question flow that can feel less form-like
- Pre-built template aimed specifically at employee evaluation
- Part of a broader survey platform with reporting dashboards
아쉬운 점
- Conversational UI is not the same as an adaptive AI follow-up interview reconstructing the story behind an answer
- No voice AI interview capability
- No stated automated quality scoring of individual responses
QuestionPro
Employee Performance Review SurveyA general employee performance review survey template on QuestionPro's enterprise survey platform, with standard question types and skip logic. It's a fielding-ready static template, useful for benchmarking, but relies on pre-written branching rather than any AI-driven follow-up.
잘하는 점
- Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with robust reporting/analytics
- Supports typical survey logic (skip/branch) for a broad performance review use case
- Likely offers multi-channel distribution options
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct the real story behind a progress rating or obstacle
- No voice AI interview option
- No transparent, prompt-level AI methodology since there's no AI interviewing layer
Typeform
Performance Review Form TemplateTypeform's template is a polished, one-question-at-a-time form for general performance reviews, not specifically tailored to a mid-year checkpoint. It's fielding-ready and visually engaging but remains a fixed-question form rather than a dynamic interview.
잘하는 점
- Clean, well-designed one-question-at-a-time interface known for higher completion rates
- Easy to brand and embed
- Simple to customize question wording and answer types
아쉬운 점
- Generic performance-review template, not mid-year-specific with goal/obstacle framing
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview
- No automated quality scoring or guided screen-share tasks
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.